Friday, February 29, 2008

Hope

'Hope' is politics, not real Iran, Iraq policy

February 29, 2008

The political salvos over Iraq between Barack Obama and John McCain the other day made for good political theater. More important, the exchange offered a revealing contrast between the politics of realism and the politics of hope.

It began with a question to Obama during the Democratic presidential debate Tuesday. Obama has pledged to pull U.S. troops out of Iraq and was asked if he reserved the right to go back into Iraq. He responded that "if al-Qaida is forming a base in Iraq, then we will have to act in a way that secures the American homeland and our interests abroad."

The next day McCain mocked Obama, ''I have some news. Al-Qaida is in Iraq." Obama fired back, ''I do know that al-Qaida is in Iraq and that's why I have said we should continue to strike al-Qaida targets. But I have some news for John McCain. There was no such thing as al-Qaida in Iraq until George Bush and John McCain decided to invade Iraq."

So what is Obama's Iraq strategy? It seems to be that he knows al-Qaida is in Iraq but he's going to pull out anyway. But if al-Qaida establishes a base in Iraq, he will go back in. Does that sound confused to you? Me, too.

His policy, in a nutshell, seems to be this: Pull troops out of Iraq and hope for the best. And anyway, the real issue is what cowboy Bush and McCain did five years ago.

Given the nation's weariness with the war, that message has proved to be appealing to Democratic primary voters. They want no truck with the grim realism of McCain's position that Iraq is part of the wider struggle against Islamist jihadism and will require a long-term U.S. commitment. Arguing over what happened in 2003 is a way to avoid facing today's realities, McCain reasonably argues.

Hope also figures in Obama's willingness, as president, to meet, without preconditions, America's adversaries like Iran's Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. French President Nicolas Sarkozy recently said he wouldn't "shake hands with people who refuse to recognize Israel." He didn't mention names but he meant the Iranian president.

Obama's position is cheered by his enthusiasts. They see his embrace of yes-we-can-talk diplomacy as a refreshing about-face from Bush's bellicosity. Hillary Clinton is the voice of realism this time. But her efforts to paint Obama's position as a naive one for a president in a dangerous world apparently aren't swaying many Democrats. Her cause wasn't helped when Bush chimed in Thursday, saying meeting with a tyrant like Ahmadinejad only buttresses an oppressive government, confuses U.S. allies and demoralizes reformers in Iran.

Given the complexities of the world, a president occasionally does have to meet with unsavory characters in pursuing vital foreign policy initiatives. Even when you think you've laid the proper groundwork, disaster can follow. President Bill Clinton labored mightily to coax Yasser Arafat to a negotiated end of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict only to see his work and peace hopes atomized by Arafat's allegiance to terrorism.

A President Obama would be taking a big gamble meeting with a rogue like Ahmadinejad without preconditions. Iran wants nuclear weapons, is a sponsor of terror responsible for mass murder as far away as Argentina, and has been at the heart of Islamist-inspired turmoil for nearly three decades. It stones women to death for adultery. It executes more children than any country in the world. Tehran lashes gays and kills them by public hanging. It jails, tortures and executes political dissidents.

When Columbia University, to its shame, gave him a platform last year, Ahmadinejad used it, in effect, to advocate an end to Israel, deny the Holocaust and claim no homosexuals are in Iran.

In a recent speech, Ahmadinejad said Iran has two missions. One was to complete the Islamic revolution in Iran. "Our nation's second important mission," he said, "is introducing the Islamic revolution to the entire mankind."

Hope may make for a good American political campaign, but it's not the basis for foreign policy.

Those Crazy Clintons!

Clinton may challenge Texas vote rules

By BETH FOUHY, Associated Press Writer 1 hour, 37 minutes ago

LAREDO, Texas - Hillary Rodham Clinton's campaign has raised the possibility of a challenge to Texas' primary and caucus rules just days before the contest, drawing a warning against legal action from the state's Democratic Party.

Top strategists for Democratic rival Barack Obama said Friday they supported the party's action, suggesting the Clinton campaign was trying to block the reporting of caucus results.

Aides to Clinton said earlier this week they were alarmed at the lack of clarity about many of the caucus rules and expressed their concerns on a conference call with Obama's staff and state party officials. Texas has a two-step voting process, with a primary and then caucuses shortly after the polls close.

Specifically, Clinton aides questioned a provision allowing caucus attendees to vote to move the location if they choose to do so, and whether people who had cast so-called "provisional ballots" in the primary would have their votes counted in the caucus.

They also expressed concern about the automated phone system precinct chairs would use to call in the results of each caucus, saying the party hadn't yet trained anyone to use the system properly.

Clinton political director Guy Cecil said he asked party officials to spell out the rules in memo form and to send them to both campaigns.

"We want to see the results in writing, and we reserve the right to challenge something if we don't believe it reflects something that was discussed on the call," he said, insisting that if there were clear problems with how the caucuses were being run, "you are allowed to say something about it."

Cecil on Friday denied that the campaign planned to sue the party, which will manage roughly 8,700 caucuses Tuesday evening.

"There were no veiled threats of lawsuits of any kind," Cecil said of the conference call.

Obama campaign manager David Plouffe said the Clinton campaign was trying to minimize the results of the caucuses. The former first lady and her team have made clear their unhappiness with caucuses, believing that they cater to the hard-core party activists who tend to support Obama. The Illinois senator has won 13 caucuses so far, while Clinton has won just two (BOO FREAKETY HOO!).

"This takes it to a new level, which is they don't want the people who are participating in those caucuses to have their results reported in a timely fashion. And I assume that's a very self-serving decision," Plouffe said.

Texas party officials said they believed Cecil was threatening legal action and wrote a letter to him and to Obama senior strategist Steve Hildebrand reflecting that concern.

"If it is true that litigation is imminent between one or both of your campaigns and the Texas Democratic Party, such action could prove to be a tragedy for a reinvigorated democratic process that is involving a record number of participants here in Texas and across the nation," party attorney Chad Dunn wrote. "Litigation regarding the TDP could cripple the momentum of a resurging Texas Democratic Party and ultimately the November 2008 election."

The letter also noted that many of Clinton's senior campaign advisers in Texas had helped to develop the rules governing the state's caucus system. A Texas party official also noted that former President Clinton won the state's caucuses in 1992 and 1996 following the same rules.

Texas has 193 delegates up for grabs Tuesday. Of those delegates, 126 will come from the primary, and 67 from the caucus.

Cocked and Loaded

No, this is not Mark on a Saturday night. And I'm disappointed I got no takers the other day....
 
:)
 

The current Chief Administrative Officer, Daniel Beard, who was appointed to the office by the Democrat majority, is a former staff member of Rep. George Miller (D-CA), a close colleague of Speaker Nancy Pelosi. More to the point, Rep. Pelosi’s own pet site, GlobalWarming.House.gov, somehow meets the “recognizable by association” criterion. Not about to take this lying down, Rep. Boehner has refused to take the site down until the CAO explains his selective targeting. In the CAO’s defense, however, perhaps hot air on global warming does naturally point to congressional Democrats.

Pants Down:

Attempting to put good news from Iraq on the front page while calling the Surrendercrats’ bluff in the process, Senate Republicans on Tuesday helped advance a Democrat bill to cut off funding for the war in Iraq and withdraw the troops within 120 days. By opening the bill to debate, Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) said it would allow Republicans to note the “extraordinary progress that’s been made in Iraq over the last six months, not only on the military side, but also with civilian reconciliation beginning to finally take hold in the country.”

The move to open debate on the Democrats’ proposed surrender appeared to have caught Democrat leaders snoozing. Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV), who last year said such things as “This surge is a bad idea” and “This war is lost,” was apparently hoping the Senate would start working on a mortgage bailout, expecting Republicans to remain firmly opposed to debating the withdrawal plan. Looks like the mortgage crisis will have to wait while Congress does its actual job of handling national security. While there is little chance the Democrats’ bill will actually pass, or even come to a vote, it will be enjoyable to watch the defeatists try to talk down the successes of our troops since the surge began one year ago.

"Holy Crap!" - Family Guy

On the good news front, viewership of the Academy Awards this year reached an all-time low of roughly 32 million people. Still, it’s rather disappointing to contemplate that 32 million humans wasted their evening with such trash. The mindless appeal of the Oscars themselves, however, was overshadowed by the glitteratis’ hero-worship of Barack Obama: “He walks into a room and you want to follow him somewhere, anywhere,” said a sycophant named George Clooney. “I’ll do whatever he says to do. I’ll collect paper cups off the ground to make his pathway clear,” gushed a ditz named Halle Berry. Liberals, of course, tend to follow along blindly while refusing to engage in critical analysis; what appeals to them is demagoguery and cheap entertainment. It is therefore no surprise that Obama’s campaign appeals to, and is supported by, the same people who are attracted to Hollywood. Obama’s campaign, after all, while long on lofty rhetoric, is notably short of substance... just like the Oscars.

 

 

Clinton vs. Obama Debate

Or, how to kill an hour with meaningless drivel. Or, What your dog heard.

On the Bush administration: Blah blah, the Bush administration has done so much damage... not real good at listening... poor planning of the current commander-in-chief... politics that is dominated by the powerful... give in to George Bush... blah blah blah blah.

On change: Blah blah, unified to bring about change... working coalition for change... bring this country together... America be as good as its promise... agenda for moving change forward... comprehensive reform... we’ve got to fix that... how change comes about... bring people together... mobilize and inspire... change is going to happen... I intend to change when I am president... debate that I’m happy to have... blah blah blah blah.

On society: Blah blah, racial divisions and religious divisions... they’ve been shut out... a sense of common purpose again and higher purpose... more competitive and more safe... on behalf of families having a tough time... delivering for the American people... debate that I’m happy to have... blah blah blah blah.

On Operation Iraqi Freedom: Blah blah, end to this war in Iraq... a tactical victory imposed upon a huge strategic blunder... most vocal opponents of the war... bogged down in a war... a big strategic blunder... terrible judgment... debate that I’m happy to have... blah blah blah blah.

On healthcare: Blah blah, I believe in universal healthcare... provide healthcare... universal healthcare... mother desperate to get healthcare for her child... anybody who wants healthcare... affordable for everybody... debate that I’m happy to have... blah blah blah blah.

On the economy: Blah blah, economy is in shambles... heartbreaking story after heartbreaking story... entire cities that have been devastated... families suffering... working harder for less... without a job, without healthcare, without a pension... homes about to be foreclosed upon... dipping into retirement accounts... restore a sense of fairness... everybody to prosper... put people back to work... good jobs and good wages... creating a green economy... creating green jobs... generate billions of dollars for solar and wind energy... prosper as we move forward... debate that I’m happy to have... blah blah blah blah.

On taxes: Blah blah, end the Bush tax cuts to the wealthy... stop giving tax breaks... change our tax code... provided tax breaks to people who really needed them as opposed to just the wealthy... blah blah blah blah.

On the Obama campaign: Blah blah, 90 percent of our donations from small donors... not yet the nominee... when I am the nominee... I am the nominee... blah blah blah blah.

On the Obama administration: Blah blah, as President of the United States... prepared to be Commander in Chief... leadership that I’ll show in the future... a top priority... my judgment has been sound... as Commander in Chief... do things differently... create transparency in our government... reduce the special interests... have great plans... a government that is more responsive... the leadership that I want to show when I’m president... as President of the United States... a system that works for everybody... go after the special interests... the judgment to lead... government that is listening... keep the American people safe... that will end when I am president... sounds good... I am happy to have a discussion... blah blah blah blah.

Wow. You really are being duped again.

Thursday, February 28, 2008

Clemens

WASHINGTON - The FBI has begun investigating whether Roger Clemens lied to Congress when he denied taking steroids, officials said Thursday in the case of another baseball star snared in a long-running inquiry into drug use by professional athletes.

Clemens, the All-Star pitcher and seven-time Cy Young Award winner, maintains he has never used steroids or other performance-enhancing drugs. His former personal trainer, Brian McNamee, claims otherwise, testifying that he injected Clemens with human growth hormones and steroids at least 16 to 21 times from 1998 to 2001.

FBI agents in Washington opened the case a little more than two weeks after both Clemens and McNamee appeared at the same House hearing on Feb. 13, each accusing the other of lying.

"The request to open an investigation on the congressional testimony of Roger Clemens has been turned over to the FBI and will receive appropriate investigative action by the Washington Field Office," said FBI spokeswoman Debra Weierman.

The inquiry came on the heels of a request Wednesday from the House Oversight Committee, could result in perjury or obstruction of justice charges against Clemens. Lawmakers did not ask for a similar investigation of McNamee.

Clemens was first identified as taking steroids in a December report by former Senate Democratic Leader George Mitchell, who looked at drug use in baseball. The Mitchell Report was the first public accounting of McNamee's allegations that he injected Clemens with HGH and steroids.

Two of Clemens' former New York Yankees teammates, Andy Pettitte and Chuck Knoblauch, have both acknowledged that McNamee was correct when he said they used performance enhancers.

In a letter seeking the inquiry, the House panel cited sworn statements by Pettitte to bolster suspicion of Clemens' statements during the committee hearing.

"We believe that his testimony in a sworn deposition on Feb. 5, 2008, and at a hearing on Feb. 13, 2008, that he never used anabolic steroids or human growth hormone, warrants further investigation," House Oversight Committee Chairman Henry Waxman of California and ranking Republican Tom Davis of Virginia wrote.

"That testimony is directly contradicted by the sworn testimony of Brian McNamee, who testified that he personally injected Mr. Clemens with anabolic steroids and human growth hormone," the lawmakers wrote.

"Mr. Clemens's testimony is also contradicted by the sworn deposition testimony and affidavit submitted to the committee by Andrew Pettitte, a former teammate of Mr. Clemens, whose testimony and affidavit reported that Mr. Clemens had admitted to him in 1999 or 2000 that he had taken human growth hormone."

Clemens is the latest professional athlete to come under federal scrutiny for statements made about alleged use of steroids or performance-enhancing drugs. Last month, the FBI opened an investigation into whether Houston Astros shortstop Miguel Tejada lied when he told federal authorities he never took steroids or HGH.

Additionally, former Olympic track gold medalist Marion Jones was sentenced in January to six months in prison for lying to federal investigators about taking the designer steroid "the clear." The drug has been linked to the Bay Area Laboratory Co-Operative, the lab at the center of the steroids scandal in professional sports.

Compensation

Emerson begins:
EVER SINCE I WAS A BOY, I have wished to write a discourse on Compensation: for it seemed to me when very young, that on this subject life was ahead of theology, and the people knew more than the preachers taught. The documents, too, from which the doctrine is to be drawn, charmed my fancy by their endless variety, and lay always before me, even in sleep; for they are the tools in our hands, the bread in our basket, the transactions of the street, the farm, and the dwelling-house, greetings, relations, debts and credits, the influence of character, the nature and endowment of all men. It seemed to me, also, that in it might be shown men a ray of divinity, the present action of the soul of this world, clean from all vestige of tradition, and so the heart of man might be bathed by an inundation of eternal love, conversing with that which he knows was always and always must be, because it really is now. It appeared, moreover, that if this doctrine could be stated in terms with any resemblance to those bright intuitions in which this truth is sometimes revealed to us, it would be a star in many dark hours and crooked passages in our journey that would not suffer us to lose our way.
 

I WAS LATELY CONFIRMED in these desires by hearing a sermon at church. The preacher, a man esteemed for his orthodoxy, unfolded in the ordinary manner the doctrine of the Last Judgment. He assumed, that judgment is not executed in this world; that the wicked are successful; that the good are miserable; and then urged from reason and from Scripture a compensation to be made to both parties in the next life. No offence appeared to be taken by the congregation at this doctrine. As far as I could observe, when the meeting broke up, they separated without remark on the sermon.

YET WHAT WAS THE IMPORT of this teaching? What did the preacher mean by saying that the good are miserable in the present life? Was it that houses and lands, offices, wine, horses, dress, luxury, are had by unprincipled men, whilst the saints are poor and despised; and that a compensation is to be made to these last hereafter, by giving them the like gratifications another day, — bank-stock and doubloons, venison and champagne? This must be the compensation intended; for what else? Is it that they are to have leave to pray and praise? to love and serve men? Why, that they can do now. The legitimate inference the disciple would draw was, — 'We are to have _such_ a good time as the sinners have now'; — or, to push it to its extreme import, — 'You sin now; we shall sin by and by; we would sin now, if we could; not being successful, we expect our revenge to-morrow.'

THE FALLACY LAY in the immense concession, that the bad are successful; that justice is not done now. The blindness of the preacher consisted in deferring to the base estimate of the market of what constitutes a manly success, instead of confronting and convicting the world from the truth; announcing the presence of the soul; the omnipotence of the will: and so establishing the standard of good and ill, of success and falsehood.

I FIND A SIMILAR BASE TONE in the popular religious works of the day, and the same doctrines assumed by the literary men when occasionally they treat the related topics. I think that our popular theology has gained in decorum, and not in principle, over the superstitions it has displaced. But men are better than this theology. Their daily life gives it the lie. Every ingenuous and aspiring soul leaves the doctrine behind him in his own experience; and all men feel sometimes the falsehood which they cannot demonstrate. For men are wiser than they know. That which they hear in schools and pulpits without after-thought, if said in conversation, would probably be questioned in silence. If a man dogmatize in a mixed company on Providence and the divine laws, he is answered by a silence which conveys well enough to an observer the dissatisfaction of the hearer, but his incapacity to make his own statement.

I SHALL ATTEMPT in this and the following chapter to record some facts that indicate the path of the law of Compensation; happy beyond my expectation, if I shall truly draw the smallest arc of this circle.

POLARITY, or action and reaction, we meet in every part of nature; in darkness and light; in heat and cold; in the ebb and flow of waters; in male and female; in the inspiration and expiration of plants and animals; in the equation of quantity and quality in the fluids of the animal body; in the systole and diastole of the heart; in the undulations of fluids, and of sound; in the centrifugal and centripetal gravity; in electricity, galvanism, and chemical affinity. Superinduce magnetism at one end of a needle; the opposite magnetism takes place at the other end. If the south attracts, the north repels. To empty here, you must condense there. An inevitable dualism bisects nature, so that each thing is a half, and suggests another thing to make it whole; as, spirit, matter; man, woman; odd, even; subjective, objective; in, out; upper, under; motion, rest; yea, nay.

WHILST THE WORLD IS THUS DUAL, so is every one of its parts. The entire system of things gets represented in every particle. There is somewhat that resembles the ebb and flow of the sea, day and night, man and woman, in a single needle of the pine, in a kernel of corn, in each individual of every animal tribe. The reaction, so grand in the elements, is repeated within these small boundaries. For example, in the animal kingdom the physiologist has observed that no creatures are favorites, but a certain compensation balances every gift and every defect. A surplusage given to one part is paid out of a reduction from another part of the same creature. If the head and neck are enlarged, the trunk and extremities are cut short.

THE THEORY OF THE MECHANIC FORCES is another example. What we gain in power is lost in time; and the converse. The periodic or compensating errors of the planets is another instance. The influences of climate and soil in political history are another. The cold climate invigorates. The barren soil does not breed fevers, crocodiles, tigers, or scorpions.

THE SAME DUALISM UNDERLIES the nature and condition of man. Every excess causes a defect; every defect an excess. Every sweet hath its sour; every evil its good. Every faculty which is a receiver of pleasure has an equal penalty put on its abuse. It is to answer for its moderation with its life. For every grain of wit there is a grain of folly. For every thing you have missed, you have gained something else; and for every thing you gain, you lose something. If riches increase, they are increased that use them. If the gatherer gathers too much, nature takes out of the man what she puts into his chest; swells the estate, but kills the owner. Nature hates monopolies and exceptions. The waves of the sea do not more speedily seek a level from their loftiest tossing, than the varieties of condition tend to equalize themselves. There is always some levelling circumstance that puts down the overbearing, the strong, the rich, the fortunate, substantially on the same ground with all others. Is a man too strong and fierce for society, and by temper and position a bad citizen, — a morose ruffian, with a dash of the pirate in him;—— nature sends him a troop of pretty sons and daughters, who are getting along in the dame's classes at the village school, and love and fear for them smooths his grim scowl to courtesy. Thus she contrives to intenerate the granite and felspar, takes the boar out and puts the lamb in, and keeps her balance true.

THE FARMER IMAGINES power and place are fine things. But the President has paid dear for his White House. It has commonly cost him all his peace, and the best of his manly attributes. To preserve for a short time so conspicuous an appearance before the world, he is content to eat dust before the real masters who stand erect behind the throne. Or, do men desire the more substantial and permanent grandeur of genius? Neither has this an immunity. He who by force of will or of thought is great, and overlooks thousands, has the charges of that eminence. With every influx of light comes new danger. Has he light? he must bear witness to the light, and always outrun that sympathy which gives him such keen satisfaction, by his fidelity to new revelations of the incessant soul. He must hate father and mother, wife and child. Has he all that the world loves and admires and covets? — he must cast behind him their admiration, and afflict them by faithfulness to his truth, and become a byword and a hissing.

THIS LAW WRITES the laws of cities and nations. It is in vain to build or plot or combine against it. Things refuse to be mismanaged long. _Res nolunt diu male administrari_. Though no checks to a new evil appear, the checks exist, and will appear. If the government is cruel, the governor's life is not safe. If you tax too high, the revenue will yield nothing. If you make the criminal code sanguinary, juries will not convict. If the law is too mild, private vengeance comes in. If the government is a terrific democracy, the pressure is resisted by an overcharge of energy in the citizen, and life glows with a fiercer flame. The true life and satisfactions of man seem to elude the utmost rigors or felicities of condition, and to establish themselves with great indifferency under all varieties of circumstances. Under all governments the influence of character remains the same, — in Turkey and in New England about alike. Under the primeval despots of Egypt, history honestly confesses that man must have been as free as culture could make him.

THESE APPEARANCES INDICATE the fact that the universe is represented in every one of its particles. Every thing in nature contains all the powers of nature. Every thing is made of one hidden stuff; as the naturalist sees one type under every metamorphosis, and regards a horse as a running man, a fish as a swimming man, a bird as a flying man, a tree as a rooted man. Each new form repeats not only the main character of the type, but part for part all the details, all the aims, furtherances, hindrances, energies, and whole system of every other. Every occupation, trade, art, transaction, is a compend of the world, and a correlative of every other. Each one is an entire emblem of human life; of its good and ill, its trials, its enemies, its course and its end. And each one must somehow accommodate the whole man, and recite all his destiny.

THE WORLD GLOBES ITSELF in a drop of dew. The microscope cannot find the animalcule which is less perfect for being little. Eyes, ears, taste, smell, motion, resistance, appetite, and organs of reproduction that take hold on eternity, — all find room to consist in the small creature. So do we put our life into every act. The true doctrine of omnipresence is, that God reappears with all his parts in every moss and cobweb. The value of the universe contrives to throw itself into every point. If the good is there, so is the evil; if the affinity, so the repulsion; if the force, so the limitation.

THUS IS THE UNIVERSE ALIVE. All things are moral. That soul, which within us is a sentiment, outside of us is a law. We feel its inspiration; out there in history we can see its fatal strength. "It is in the world, and the world was made by it." Justice is not postponed. A perfect equity adjusts its balance in all parts of life. {Oi chusoi Dios aei enpiptousi}, — The dice of God are always loaded. The world looks like a multiplication-table, or a mathematical equation, which, turn it how you will, balances itself. Take what figure you will, its exact value, nor more nor less, still returns to you. Every secret is told, every crime is punished, every virtue rewarded, every wrong redressed, in silence and certainty. What we call retribution is the universal necessity by which the whole appears wherever a part appears. If you see smoke, there must be fire. If you see a hand or a limb, you know that the trunk to which it belongs is there behind.

EVERY ACT REWARDS ITSELF, or, in other words, integrates itself, in a twofold manner; first, in the thing, or in real nature; and secondly, in the circumstance, or in apparent nature. Men call the circumstance the retribution. The causal retribution is in the thing, and is seen by the soul. The retribution in the circumstance is seen by the understanding; it is inseparable from the thing, but is often spread over a long time, and so does not become distinct until after many years. The specific stripes may follow late after the offence, but they follow because they accompany it. Crime and punishment grow out of one stem. Punishment is a fruit that unsuspected ripens within the flower of the pleasure which concealed it. Cause and effect, means and ends, seed and fruit, cannot be severed; for the effect already blooms in the cause, the end preexists in the means, the fruit in the seed.

WHILST THUS THE WORLD WILL BE WHOLE, and refuses to be disparted, we seek to act partially, to sunder, to appropriate; for example, — to gratify the senses, we sever the pleasure of the senses from the needs of the character. The ingenuity of man has always been dedicated to the solution of one problem, — how to detach the sensual sweet, the sensual strong, the sensual bright, &c., from the moral sweet, the moral deep, the moral fair; that is, again, to contrive to cut clean off this upper surface so thin as to leave it bottomless; to get a _one end_, without an _other end_. The soul says, Eat; the body would feast. The soul says, The man and woman shall be one flesh and one soul; the body would join the flesh only. The soul says, Have dominion over all things to the ends of virtue; the body would have the power over things to its own ends.

THE SOUL STRIVES AMAIN TO LIVE and work through all things. It would be the only fact. All things shall be added unto it power, pleasure, knowledge, beauty. The particular man aims to be somebody; to set up for himself; to truck and higgle for a private good; and, in particulars, to ride, that he may ride; to dress, that he may be dressed; to eat, that he may eat; and to govern, that he may be seen. Men seek to be great; they would have offices, wealth, power, and fame. They think that to be great is to possess one side of nature, — the sweet, without the other side, — the bitter.

THIS DIVIDING AND DETACHING is steadily counteracted. Up to this day, it must be owned, no projector has had the smallest success. The parted water reunites behind our hand. Pleasure is taken out of pleasant things, profit out of profitable things, power out of strong things, as soon as we seek to separate them from the whole. We can no more halve things and get the sensual good, by itself, than we can get an inside that shall have no outside, or a light without a shadow. "Drive out nature with a fork, she comes running back."

LIFE INVESTS ITSELF with inevitable conditions, which the unwise seek to dodge, which one and another brags that he does not know; that they do not touch him; — but the brag is on his lips, the conditions are in his soul. If he escapes them in one part, they attack him in another more vital part. If he has escaped them in form, and in the appearance, it is because he has resisted his life, and fled from himself, and the retribution is so much death. So signal is the failure of all attempts to make this separation of the good from the tax, that the experiment would not be tried, — since to try it is to be mad, — but for the circumstance, that when the disease began in the will, of rebellion and separation, the intellect is at once infected, so that the man ceases to see God whole in each object, but is able to see the sensual allurement of an object, and not see the sensual hurt; he sees the mermaid's head, but not the dragon's tail; and thinks he can cut off that which he would have, from that which he would not have. "How secret art thou who dwellest in the highest heavens in silence, O thou only great God, sprinkling with an unwearied Providence certain penal blindnesses upon such as have unbridled desires!"

THE HUMAN SOUL IS TRUE to these facts in the painting of fable, of history, of law, of proverbs, of conversation. It finds a tongue in literature unawares. Thus the Greeks called Jupiter, Supreme Mind; but having traditionally ascribed to him many base actions, they involuntarily made amends to reason, by tying up the hands of so bad a god. He is made as helpless as a king of England. Prometheus knows one secret which Jove must bargain for; Minerva, another. He cannot get his own thunders; Minerva keeps the key of them.

"Of all the gods, I only know the keys
That ope the solid doors within whose vaults
His thunders sleep."

A PLAIN CONFESSION of the in-working of the All, and of its moral aim. The Indian mythology ends in the same ethics; and it would seem impossible for any fable to be invented and get any currency which was not moral. Aurora forgot to ask youth for her lover, and though Tithonus is immortal, he is old. Achilles is not quite invulnerable; the sacred waters did not wash the heel by which Thetis held him. Siegfried, in the Nibelungen, is not quite immortal, for a leaf fell on his back whilst he was bathing in the dragon's blood, and that spot which it covered is mortal. And so it must be. There is a crack in every thing God has made. It would seem, there is always this vindictive circumstance stealing in at unawares, even into the wild poesy in which the human fancy attempted to make bold holiday, and to shake itself free of the old laws, — this back-stroke, this kick of the gun, certifying that the law is fatal; that in nature nothing can be given, all things are sold.

THIS IS THAT ANCIENT DOCTRINE of Nemesis, who keeps watch in the universe, and lets no offence go unchastised. The Furies, they said, are attendants on justice, and if the sun in heaven should transgress his path, they would punish him. The poets related that stone walls, and iron swords, and leathern thongs had an occult sympathy with the wrongs of their owners; that the belt which Ajax gave Hector dragged the Trojan hero over the field at the wheels of the car of Achilles, and the sword which Hector gave Ajax was that on whose point Ajax fell. They recorded, that when the Thasians erected a statue to Theagenes, a victor in the games, one of his rivals went to it by night, and endeavoured to throw it down by repeated blows, until at last he moved it from its pedestal, and was crushed to death beneath its fall.

THIS VOICE OF FABLE has in it somewhat divine. It came from thought above the will of the writer. That is the best part of each writer, which has nothing private in it; that which he does not know; that which flowed out of his constitution, and not from his too active invention; that which in the study of a single artist you might not easily find, but in the study of many, you would abstract as the spirit of them all. Phidias it is not, but the work of man in that early Hellenic world, that I would know. The name and circumstance of Phidias, however convenient for history, embarrass when we come to the highest criticism. We are to see that which man was tending to do in a given period, and was hindered, or, if you will, modified in doing, by the interfering volitions of Phidias, of Dante, of Shakspeare, the organ whereby man at the moment wrought.

STILL MORE STRIKING is the expression of this fact in the proverbs of all nations, which are always the literature of reason, or the statements of an absolute truth, without qualification. Proverbs, like the sacred books of each nation, are the sanctuary of the intuitions. That which the droning world, chained to appearances, will not allow the realist to say in his own words, it will suffer him to say in proverbs without contradiction. And this law of laws which the pulpit, the senate, and the college deny, is hourly preached in all markets and workshops by flights of proverbs, whose teaching is as true and as omnipresent as that of birds and flies.

ALL THINGS ARE DOUBLE, one against another. — Tit for tat; an eye for an eye; a tooth for a tooth; blood for blood; measure for measure; love for love. — Give and it shall be given you. — He that watereth shall be watered himself. — What will you have? quoth God; pay for it and take it. — Nothing venture, nothing have. — Thou shalt be paid exactly for what thou hast done, no more, no less. — Who doth not work shall not eat. — Harm watch, harm catch. — Curses always recoil on the head of him who imprecates them. — If you put a chain around the neck of a slave, the other end fastens itself around your own. — Bad counsel confounds the adviser. — The Devil is an ass.

IT IS THUS WRITTEN because it is thus in life. Our action is overmastered and characterized above our will by the law of nature. We aim at a petty end quite aside from the public good, but our act arranges itself by irresistible magnetism in a line with the poles of the world.

A MAN CANNOT SPEAK but he judges himself. With his will, or against his will, he draws his portrait to the eye of his companions by every word. Every opinion reacts on him who utters it. It is a thread-ball thrown at a mark, but the other end remains in the thrower's bag. Or, rather, it is a harpoon hurled at the whale, unwinding, as it flies, a coil of cord in the boat, and if the harpoon is not good, or not well thrown, it will go nigh to cut the steersman in twain, or to sink the boat.

YOU CANNOT DO WRONG without suffering wrong. "No man had ever a point of pride that was not injurious to him," said Burke. The exclusive in fashionable life does not see that he excludes himself from enjoyment, in the attempt to appropriate it. The exclusionist in religion does not see that he shuts the door of heaven on himself, in striving to shut out others. Treat men as pawns and ninepins, and you shall suffer as well as they. If you leave out their heart, you shall lose your own. The senses would make things of all persons; of women, of children, of the poor. The vulgar proverb, "I will get it from his purse or get it from his skin," is sound philosophy.

ALL INFRACTIONS OF LOVE AND EQUITY in our social relations are speedily punished. They are punished by fear. Whilst I stand in simple relations to my fellow-man, I have no displeasure in meeting him. We meet as water meets water, or as two currents of air mix, with perfect diffusion and interpenetration of nature. But as soon as there is any departure from simplicity, and attempt at halfness, or good for me that is not good for him, my neighbour feels the wrong; he shrinks from me as far as I have shrunk from him; his eyes no longer seek mine; there is war between us; there is hate in him and fear in me.

ALL THE OLD ABUSES in society, universal and particular, all unjust accumulations of property and power, are avenged in the same manner. Fear is an instructer of great sagacity, and the herald of all revolutions. One thing he teaches, that there is rottenness where he appears. He is a carrion crow, and though you see not well what he hovers for, there is death somewhere. Our property is timid, our laws are timid, our cultivated classes are timid. Fear for ages has boded and mowed and gibbered over government and property. That obscene bird is not there for nothing. He indicates great wrongs which must be revised.

OF THE LIKE NATURE is that expectation of change which instantly follows the suspension of our voluntary activity. The terror of cloudless noon, the emerald of Polycrates, the awe of prosperity, the instinct which leads every generous soul to impose on itself tasks of a noble asceticism and vicarious virtue, are the tremblings of the balance of justice through the heart and mind of man.

EXPERIENCED MEN OF THE WORLD know very well that it is best to pay scot and lot as they go along, and that a man often pays dear for a small frugality. The borrower runs in his own debt. Has a man gained any thing who has received a hundred favors and rendered none? Has he gained by borrowing, through indolence or cunning, his neighbour's wares, or horses, or money? There arises on the deed the instant acknowledgment of benefit on the one part, and of debt on the other; that is, of superiority and inferiority. The transaction remains in the memory of himself and his neighbour; and every new transaction alters, according to its nature, their relation to each other. He may soon come to see that he had better have broken his own bones than to have ridden in his neighbour's coach, and that "the highest price he can pay for a thing is to ask for it."

A WISE MAN will extend this lesson to all parts of life, and know that it is the part of prudence to face every claimant, and pay every just demand on your time, your talents, or your heart. Always pay; for, first or last, you must pay your entire debt. Persons and events may stand for a time between you and justice, but it is only a postponement. You must pay at last your own debt. If you are wise, you will dread a prosperity which only loads you with more. Benefit is the end of nature. But for every benefit which you receive, a tax is levied. He is great who confers the most benefits. He is base — and that is the one base thing in the universe — to receive favors and render none. In the order of nature we cannot render benefits to those from whom we receive them, or only seldom. But the benefit we receive must be rendered again, line for line, deed for deed, cent for cent, to somebody. Beware of too much good staying in your hand. It will fast corrupt and worm worms. Pay it away quickly in some sort.

LABOR IS WATCHED OVER by the same pitiless laws. Cheapest, say the prudent, is the dearest labor. What we buy in a broom, a mat, a wagon, a knife, is some application of good sense to a common want. It is best to pay in your land a skilful gardener, or to buy good sense applied to gardening; in your sailor, good sense applied to navigation; in the house, good sense applied to cooking, sewing, serving; in your agent, good sense applied to accounts and affairs. So do you multiply your presence, or spread yourself throughout your estate. But because of the dual constitution of things, in labor as in life there can be no cheating. The thief steals from himself. The swindler swindles himself. For the real price of labor is knowledge and virtue, whereof wealth and credit are signs. These signs, like paper money, may be counterfeited or stolen, but that which they represent, namely, knowledge and virtue, cannot be counterfeited or stolen. These ends of labor cannot be answered but by real exertions of the mind, and in obedience to pure motives. The cheat, the defaulter, the gambler, cannot extort the knowledge of material and moral nature which his honest care and pains yield to the operative. The law of nature is, Do the thing, and you shall have the power: but they who do not the thing have not the power.

HUMAN LABOR, through all its forms, from the sharpening of a stake to the construction of a city or an epic, is one immense illustration of the perfect compensation of the universe. The absolute balance of Give and Take, the doctrine that every thing has its price, — and if that price is not paid, not that thing but something else is obtained, and that it is impossible to get any thing without its price, — is not less sublime in the columns of a leger than in the budgets of states, in the laws of light and darkness, in all the action and reaction of nature. I cannot doubt that the high laws which each man sees implicated in those processes with which he is conversant, the stern ethics which sparkle on his chisel-edge, which are measured out by his plumb and foot-rule, which stand as manifest in the footing of the shop-bill as in the history of a state, — do recommend to him his trade, and though seldom named, exalt his business to his imagination.

THE LEAGUE BETWEEN VIRTUE AND NATURE engages all things to assume a hostile front to vice. The beautiful laws and substances of the world persecute and whip the traitor. He finds that things are arranged for truth and benefit, but there is no den in the wide world to hide a rogue. Commit a crime, and the earth is made of glass. Commit a crime, and it seems as if a coat of snow fell on the ground, such as reveals in the woods the track of every partridge and fox and squirrel and mole. You cannot recall the spoken word, you cannot wipe out the foot-track, you cannot draw up the ladder, so as to leave no inlet or clew. Some damning circumstance always transpires. The laws and substances of nature — water, snow, wind, gravitation — become penalties to the thief.

ON THE OTHER HAND, the law holds with equal sureness for all right action. Love, and you shall be loved. All love is mathematically just, as much as the two sides of an algebraic equation. The good man has absolute good, which like fire turns every thing to its own nature, so that you cannot do him any harm; but as the royal armies sent against Napoleon, when he approached, cast down their colors and from enemies became friends, so disasters of all kinds, as sickness, offence, poverty, prove benefactors: —

"Winds blow and waters roll
Strength to the brave, and power and deity,
Yet in themselves are nothing."

THE GOOD ARE BEFRIENDED even by weakness and defect. As no man had ever a point of pride that was not injurious to him, so no man had ever a defect that was not somewhere made useful to him. The stag in the fable admired his horns and blamed his feet, but when the hunter came, his feet saved him, and afterwards, caught in the thicket, his horns destroyed him. Every man in his lifetime needs to thank his faults. As no man thoroughly understands a truth until he has contended against it, so no man has a thorough acquaintance with the hindrances or talents of men, until he has suffered from the one, and seen the triumph of the other over his own want of the same. Has he a defect of temper that unfits him to live in society? Thereby he is driven to entertain himself alone, and acquire habits of self-help; and thus, like the wounded oyster, he mends his shell with pearl.

OUR STRENGTH GROWS OUT OF OUR WEAKNESS. The indignation which arms itself with secret forces does not awaken until we are pricked and stung and sorely assailed. A great man is always willing to be little. Whilst he sits on the cushion of advantages, he goes to sleep. When he is pushed, tormented, defeated, he has a chance to learn something; he has been put on his wits, on his manhood; he has gained facts; learns his ignorance; is cured of the insanity of conceit; has got moderation and real skill. The wise man throws himself on the side of his assailants. It is more his interest than it is theirs to find his weak point. The wound cicatrizes and falls off from him like a dead skin, and when they would triumph, lo! he has passed on invulnerable. Blame is safer than praise. I hate to be defended in a newspaper. As long as all that is said is said against me, I feel a certain assurance of success. But as soon as honeyed words of praise are spoken for me, I feel as one that lies unprotected before his enemies. In general, every evil to which we do not succumb is a benefactor. As the Sandwich Islander believes that the strength and valor of the enemy he kills passes into himself, so we gain the strength of the temptation we resist.

THE SAME GUARDS WHICH PROTECT US from disaster, defect, and enmity, defend us, if we will, from selfishness and fraud. Bolts and bars are not the best of our institutions, nor is shrewdness in trade a mark of wisdom. Men suffer all their life long, under the foolish superstition that they can be cheated. But it is as impossible for a man to be cheated by any one but himself, as for a thing to be and not to be at the same time. There is a third silent party to all our bargains. The nature and soul of things takes on itself the guaranty of the fulfilment of every contract, so that honest service cannot come to loss. If you serve an ungrateful master, serve him the more. Put God in your debt. Every stroke shall be repaid. The longer the payment is withholden, the better for you; for compound interest on compound interest is the rate and usage of this exchequer.

THE HISTORY OF PERSECUTION is a history of endeavours to cheat nature, to make water run up hill, to twist a rope of sand. It makes no difference whether the actors be many or one, a tyrant or a mob. A mob is a society of bodies voluntarily bereaving themselves of reason, and traversing its work. The mob is man voluntarily descending to the nature of the beast. Its fit hour of activity is night. Its actions are insane like its whole constitution. It persecutes a principle; it would whip a right; it would tar and feather justice, by inflicting fire and outrage upon the houses and persons of those who have these. It resembles the prank of boys, who run with fire-engines to put out the ruddy aurora streaming to the stars. The inviolate spirit turns their spite against the wrongdoers. The martyr cannot be dishonored. Every lash inflicted is a tongue of fame; every prison, a more illustrious abode; every burned book or house enlightens the world; every suppressed or expunged word reverberates through the earth from side to side. Hours of sanity and consideration are always arriving to communities, as to individuals, when the truth is seen, and the martyrs are justified.

THUS DO ALL THINGS PREACH the indifferency of circumstances. The man is all. Every thing has two sides, a good and an evil. Every advantage has its tax. I learn to be content. But the doctrine of compensation is not the doctrine of indifferency. The thoughtless say, on hearing these representations, — What boots it to do well? there is one event to good and evil; if I gain any good, I must pay for it; if I lose any good, I gain some other; all actions are indifferent.

THERE IS A DEEPER FACT IN THE SOUL than compensation, to wit, its own nature. The soul is not a compensation, but a life. The soul _is_. Under all this running sea of circumstance, whose waters ebb and flow with perfect balance, lies the aboriginal abyss of real Being. Essence, or God, is not a relation, or a part, but the whole. Being is the vast affirmative, excluding negation, self-balanced, and swallowing up all relations, parts, and times within itself. Nature, truth, virtue, are the influx from thence. Vice is the absence or departure of the same. Nothing, Falsehood, may indeed stand as the great Night or shade, on which, as a background, the living universe paints itself forth; but no fact is begotten by it; it cannot work; for it is not. It cannot work any good; it cannot work any harm. It is harm inasmuch as it is worse not to be than to be.

WE FEEL DEFRAUDED of the retribution due to evil acts, because the criminal adheres to his vice and contumacy, and does not come to a crisis or judgment anywhere in visible nature. There is no stunning confutation of his nonsense before men and angels. Has he therefore outwitted the law? Inasmuch as he carries the malignity and the lie with him, he so far deceases from nature. In some manner there will be a demonstration of the wrong to the understanding also; but should we not see it, this deadly deduction makes square the eternal account.

NEITHER CAN IT BE SAID, on the other hand, that the gain of rectitude must be bought by any loss. There is no penalty to virtue; no penalty to wisdom; they are proper additions of being. In a virtuous action, I properly _am_; in a virtuous act, I add to the world; I plant into deserts conquered from Chaos and Nothing, and see the darkness receding on the limits of the horizon. There can be no excess to love; none to knowledge; none to beauty, when these attributes are considered in the purest sense. The soul refuses limits, and always affirms an Optimism, never a Pessimism.

HIS LIFE IS A PROGRESS, and not a station. His instinct is trust. Our instinct uses "more" and "less" in application to man, of the _presence of the soul_, and not of its absence; the brave man is greater than the coward; the true, the benevolent, the wise, is more a man, and not less, than the fool and knave. There is no tax on the good of virtue; for that is the incoming of God himself, or absolute existence, without any comparative. Material good has its tax, and if it came without desert or sweat, has no root in me, and the next wind will blow it away. But all the good of nature is the soul's, and may be had, if paid for in nature's lawful coin, that is, by labor which the heart and the head allow. I no longer wish to meet a good I do not earn, for example, to find a pot of buried gold, knowing that it brings with it new burdens. I do not wish more external goods, — neither possessions, nor honors, nor powers, nor persons. The gain is apparent; the tax is certain. But there is no tax on the knowledge that the compensation exists, and that it is not desirable to dig up treasure. Herein I rejoice with a serene eternal peace. I contract the boundaries of possible mischief. I learn the wisdom of St. Bernard, — "Nothing can work me damage except myself; the harm that I sustain I carry about with me, and never am a real sufferer but by my own fault."

IN THE NATURE OF THE SOUL is the compensation for the inequalities of condition. The radical tragedy of nature seems to be the distinction of More and Less. How can Less not feel the pain; how not feel indignation or malevolence towards More? Look at those who have less faculty, and one feels sad, and knows not well what to make of it. He almost shuns their eye; he fears they will upbraid God. What should they do? It seems a great injustice. But see the facts nearly, and these mountainous inequalities vanish. Love reduces them, as the sun melts the iceberg in the sea. The heart and soul of all men being one, this bitterness of _His_ and _Mine_ ceases. His is mine. I am my brother, and my brother is me. If I feel overshadowed and outdone by great neighbours, I can yet love; I can still receive; and he that loveth maketh his own the grandeur he loves. Thereby I make the discovery that my brother is my guardian, acting for me with the friendliest designs, and the estate I so admired and envied is my own. It is the nature of the soul to appropriate all things. Jesus and Shakspeare are fragments of the soul, and by love I conquer and incorporate them in my own conscious domain. His virtue, — is not that mine? His wit, — if it cannot be made mine, it is not wit.

SUCH, ALSO, IS THE NATURAL HISTORY of calamity. The changes which break up at short intervals the prosperity of men are advertisements of a nature whose law is growth. Every soul is by this intrinsic necessity quitting its whole system of things, its friends, and home, and laws, and faith, as the shell-fish crawls out of its beautiful but stony case, because it no longer admits of its growth, and slowly forms a new house. In proportion to the vigor of the individual, these revolutions are frequent, until in some happier mind they are incessant, and all worldly relations hang very loosely about him, becoming, as it were, a transparent fluid membrane through which the living form is seen, and not, as in most men, an indurated heterogeneous fabric of many dates, and of no settled character in which the man is imprisoned. Then there can be enlargement, and the man of to-day scarcely recognizes the man of yesterday. And such should be the outward biography of man in time, a putting off of dead circumstances day by day, as he renews his raiment day by day. But to us, in our lapsed estate, resting, not advancing, resisting, not cooperating with the divine expansion, this growth comes by shocks.

WE CANNOT PART WITH OUR FRIENDS. We cannot let our angels go. We do not see that they only go out, that archangels may come in. [HIGHLIGHTED BECAUSE THIS IS ONE OF MY FAVORITE LINES IN ALL LITERATURE.] We are idolaters of the old. We do not believe in the riches of the soul, in its proper eternity and omnipresence. We do not believe there is any force in to-day to rival or recreate that beautiful yesterday. We linger in the ruins of the old tent, where once we had bread and shelter and organs, nor believe that the spirit can feed, cover, and nerve us again. We cannot again find aught so dear, so sweet, so graceful. But we sit and weep in vain. The voice of the Almighty saith, 'Up and onward for evermore!' We cannot stay amid the ruins. Neither will we rely on the new; and so we walk ever with reverted eyes, like those monsters who look backwards.

AND YET THE COMPENSATIONS of calamity are made apparent to the understanding also, after long intervals of time. A fever, a mutilation, a cruel disappointment, a loss of wealth, a loss of friends, seems at the moment unpaid loss, and unpayable. But the sure years reveal the deep remedial force that underlies all facts. The death of a dear friend, wife, brother, lover, which seemed nothing but privation, somewhat later assumes the aspect of a guide or genius; for it commonly operates revolutions in our way of life, terminates an epoch of infancy or of youth which was waiting to be closed, breaks up a wonted occupation, or a household, or style of living, and allows the formation of new ones more friendly to the growth of character. It permits or constrains the formation of new acquaintances, and the reception of new influences that prove of the first importance to the next years; and the man or woman who would have remained a sunny garden-flower, with no room for its roots and too much sunshine for its head, by the falling of the walls and the neglect of the gardener, is made the banian of the forest, yielding shade and fruit to wide neighbourhoods of men.

Back to the important issues.

By Jim CaplePage 2

Long live the spring training notes



BOSTON -- The Red Sox announced a new ticket plan in which fans have the option of paying with a subprime rate mortgage, their first- or second-born child (depending on seat location) or a body organ, preferably a kidney because that would leave the fan with another one for 2009. ... After consulting with several doctors, RHP Curt Schilling has decided to treat his injured shoulder by wearing a bloody sweatshirt. ... Boston GM Theo Epstein signed Terry Francona to the longest contract extension any manager has received in team history: three innings, or until he does something that upsets the fans, whichever comes first. ... The Boston Globe has begun work on a commemorative book for the 2008 season titled "162-0." ... The Red Sox announced they will raise ticket prices again by the time you finish reading this sentence. ...

G.W.B.

Bush also defended his stance of not talking directly with leaders of adversaries such as Iran and Cuba without setting preconditions. In doing so, he offered some of his strongest criticism yet of Raul Castro, who assumed Cuba's presidency on Sunday after his ailing brother Fidel, who ruled for decades, stepped aside.

"Sitting down at the table, having your picture taken with a tyrant such as Raul Castro, for example, lends the status of the office and the status of our country to him," Bush said. (Note: Obama is willing to meet these dictators and tyrants without preconditions. What message does that send?)

He said that Raul Castro is "nothing more than an extension of what his brother did, which is ruin an island."

 
 
 

Speaker Pelosi works for outlaw corporations to give even more U.S. jobs to foreign workers

Incredible as it may seem amidst talk of recessions, job cuts and stagnant wages, we are finding reports and signs everywhere that House Speaker Pelosi is negotiating to give millions of U.S. jobs to foreign workers.

It appears that the irresponsible, outlaw minority of the corporate world that insists on illegal foreign labor has a special "in" with the Democratic Speaker (no surprise there. Democrats are all about sp.

Pelosi's backroom deals appear to be motivated by fear that a group of freshmen Democrats may get most Republicans to help them force a vote on the enforcement-only SAVE Act (Secure America with Verification Enforcement). That bill -- with 145 bi-partisan signers in the House and Senate -- primarily would drive millions of illegal aliens out of their jobs - a good thing.

But Pelosi is trying to ensure that if the enforcement-only bill comes to a vote it will include huge increases in H-2B and H-1B visas for foreign workers of all kinds, and that it will include millions of legal work permits for all the illegal aliens currently holding a job - a bad thing.

I want every American to be aware of Speaker Pelosi's callous attitude toward the 23 million, less-educated working-age Americans who do not currently have a job.

This group of Americans without any college education (indirectly caused by government involvement in the education system) and without a job increased by 2 million between 2000 and 2005 at the same time Congress was importing 1.5 million foreign workers of the same education level, according to research by the Center for Immigration Studies.

Nobody in Congress has a worse grade (F-minus) than Nancy Pelosi when it comes to protecting American jobs, American wages and American working conditions from the downward pressures of massive immigration.

As the head Democrat, she stands in stark contrast to most of the newly elected Democrats who are pledged to protecting American workers and fighting illegal immigration. Unfortunately, Pelosi, the most radical Member of Congress on the immigration issue, is using her power as Speaker of the House to try to wreak even more damage on the most vulnerable of American workers and legal immigrant workers in this country. I urge all concerned Americans to contact their Members of Congress and express opposition to Rep. Pelosi's outrageous push for more foreign work visas.

We support the Troops, but Not the War

McCain’s Extra-Territorial Birth Raises Questions About Ability to Become President.


Of course, this headline brought to you by,
NYTimes.



The all-but certain nomination of John McCain to be the Republican candidate for president has again raised a question nagging the Arizona senator: does his birth outside the United States prevent him from holding the nation’s highest office?

McCain, part of a storied naval family and a Vietnam War hero in his own right, was born in 1936 on a military installation in the Panama Canal Zone. The issue of his birthplace raises the question of whether it qualifies as a foreign birth and therefore violates the constitutional requirement that a commander in chief be a “natural-born citizen.”

South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham told the New York Times that it would be unthinkable for McCain - or anyone born on a military installation - not to be allowed to run for president.

“[McCain’s father] was posted there on orders from the United States government,” Graham told the Times. “If that becomes a problem, we need to tell every military family that your kid can’t be president if the take an overseas assignment.

Message

THE RICHEST PERSONS ARE THOSE WHO GIVE MOST IN SERVICE TO OTHERS.

The truly happy and successful individual is the man or woman who is healthy, financially secure, challenged in his or her career, and is making a difference in the lives of others. It isn’t always easy to render service to others. The world is a cynical and dangerous place where others are likely to mistrust your motives. They can be convinced only by consistent, sustained, outstanding service that is enthusiastically and cheerfully offered. In time, even the most cynical individual will come to accept your willingness to go the extra mile if you are sincere in your offers of assistance and in the service you provide.

 

 

Funny Foto


Are you ready for some Baseball??????

Sox start today at 1:05 pm in a split-squad game against BC, and play Northeastern at 6:05 pm. Their real first game against another MLB team is tomorrow at 7:05 pm vs. the Twinkies.

Sox also signed Bartolo Colon to a minor league contract. They may be able to ride that old horse for 6-10 games...ex- Cy Young winners are hard to come by...

It's HERE!

Time to resubscribe to XMRadio!

Time to get a new TV for Dave's back porch!

And, it is rumored that 'The Bitch' is packing it in on Friday!

What a Week! I'm so excited I may need to see a doctor...4 hours...

Oh My God! Celeste! Rent Me Out! RENT ME OUT!!!!!

:)

Across the Universe

(February 4, 2008) The Beatles’ hit song Across the Universe will become the first song ever to be beamed directly into space, NASA announced.
The track will be transmitted through the Deep Space Network – a network of antennas – today at 7 PM EST. Today is the 40th anniversary of the song being recorded.
According to a statement from NASA, the transmission will be aimed at the North Star, Polaris, which is 431 light years away from Earth. The song will travel across the universe at a speed of 186,000 miles per second.
In a message to NASA, the former Beatle Sir Paul McCartney said “Send my love to the aliens. All the best, Paul,” according to the BBC.
Fans can watch the event online via the Web site www.acrosstheuniverseday.com.

Clinton to Raise Taxes, Increase Government; Says you are 'bad parents'

By MIKE GLOVER, Associated Press Writer

Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton is offering a plan to improve childhood nutrition and setting a goal to reduce by half the 12 million youngsters living in poverty over the next dozen years.

A package of proposals, to be unveiled Thursday, includes a "comprehensive" early education initiative that starts with nurse's visits for pregnant women, lets children begin the Head Start program earlier and calls for universal pre-kindergarten programs.

The New York senator also says she would deal with childhood hunger by putting in place a food safety net, and give children "greater access to healthy, fresh food."

She was to spell out her proposals in a speech at the child care development center on Ohio University's southern campus.

Clinton aides said the new programs would carry and annual pricetag of $5 billion to $6 billion. A significant portion of her plan comes by expanding existing programs. She would cover the cost by toughening enforcement to collect taxes currently owed but not paid.

Clinton said she would direct her agriculture secretary to develop a plan to end childhood hunger. The nutrition effort would come largely through signing up more people for the food stamp program and expanding its benefits.

School breakfast programs would be universal in low-income neighborhoods under her proposal. She also would double the size of a summer nutrition program aimed at feeding low-income children when they aren't in school.

Clinton also says she would launch an effort to get junk food out of schools. She would require schools that get federal funding through the school lunch or breakfast programs to offer only food that meets or surpasses USDA standards.

Background documents outlining her proposal were provided to The Associated Press and include some proposals that Clinton has offered in the past such as calling for an increase in the minimum wage to aid the working poor (which, historically, causes an increase in unemployment for the poor - another example of 'redistribution'), as well as expanding the earned income tax credit, a move that helps the same group.

In addition, Clinton was calling for stronger programs aimed at cutting teen pregnancy as well as toughening child support enforcement programs to "support responsible fatherhood."

Clinton argues that roughly 12.9 million children live in poverty, with about 5 million living in extreme poverty. That means their families have incomes of less than half the federal poverty level.

The effort would bolster minority children, Clinton says, with roughly one-third of black children living in poverty and 28 percent of Hispanic youngsters living in poor households. That compares with the roughly 10 percent of white children in poverty, she says. Despite that, 35 percent of all children living in poverty are white, making them the largest group of youngsters in poverty.

"While we celebrate America as a place where an individual's circumstances at birth should not determine his or her life chances, the fact is that economic mobility is now in decline in America," Clinton's background documents say. "Children born in poverty are likely to live in poverty their whole lives." (Actually, children born in poverty are likely to remain in poverty if not given the impetus to achieve by getting off government programs as they age.)

The effort to provide nursing care for pregnant women builds on a program she shaped as first lady of Arkansas, a program she said has been a dramatic success.

Wednesday, February 27, 2008

The Nastradamus Code: WW III

Chapter Four: The Time of Troubles
Crazed leader launches nuclear bombs on Mediterranean and Europe
(Century II, Quatrains 3 and 4)

During a period of continuing unrest, the leader of a Middle Eastern country will be able to obtain a nuclear weapon. He will go to the greatest lengths over the smallest things and will not hesitate to use the weapon because of his obsessions with deadly warfare. The people he is warring against retaliate with a nuclear weapon. The country has a coast on the Mediterranean.


One of the bombs will land in the Mediterranean instead of the land, poisoning all the fish. The passages of trade in the region will be disrupted so that the people on the other coast will be desperate for food and will eat the fish anyway. It will happen near the east coast of the Mediterranean in a region of dark-colored cliffs.

(Century III, Quatrain 83)

The nuclear weapon being dropped by one of the Middle Eastern countries will spark off yet another war on top of that war. European nations will try to interfere to diminish the threat to oil supplies. When the European countries try to interfere, the crazed leader will use the rest of his arsenal on Europe, most striking the Italian Peninsula.

The European Mediterranean coast, particularly that of Italy and France, will be almost uninhabitable, and Italy will get the brunt. This leader is not the Antichrist but helps to set the stage for the Antichrist to rise to power with little or no opposition.

Volcanoes, earthquakes, floods, droughts
(Century IV, Quatrain 67)

A very bright, previously unknown comet will appear and coincide with the time of great geological troubles, with earthquakes and volcanoes erupting and disrupting weather systems. This will cause widespread famines, droughts, and social upheavals in unexpected places. Nations that are considered prosperous and powerful, particularly western nations, will be weakened. They will be torn with civil strife and rioting as people migrate to areas that have water and can support crop-growing. The social upheaval and weakening of political structures will help the Antichrist come to power.

The United States in particular will be subject to serious natural disasters, particularly earthquakes and flooding, and flatten the nation from end to end, causing enormous conflict, despair, and misery. The US will be bankrupted attempting to deal with its disasters. Three other great nations will send aid to help the citizens survive.

(Century VIII, Quatrain 29)

Earth changes will take place that will help the Antichrist's drive for world conquest. In central Europe, southern Europe, and in the Middle East, around the eastern end of the Mediterranean, there will be severe floods. As a result of the disruption to local governments by the natural disasters, the Antichrist will move his troops in under the guise of helping the people restore civil order, but really use this as a device to take over countries, and to use the populations like slaves.

Serious economic problems will persist along with great social unrest, contributing to the ease with which the Antichrist can seize power. The frightened and hopeful populace will be vulnerable to his rhetoric. The Antichrist will use the disasters as opportunities to overthrow governments and sneak spies into a country. Martial law will be declared in many areas to stop rioting and looting. The Middle East, the source of his power, will not be as devastated as the rest of the world. He offers assistance to other countries trying to recover but he will eventually stab them in the back.

Antichrist's rise to power in Middle East

(Century II, Quatrains 23 and 81)

The Antichrist will take over Iran by using a human decoy to trick the Iranian Ayatollah in power. This will involve the "yes men" and puppets of the Ayatollah's court. The Antichrist will first drive away internal supporters of the Ayatollah by starting a civil war. Then he will put forth a man as a leader, a man for Iranians loyal to the Ayatollah to concentrate their hate on. The man will be assassinated while Iran is being taken over, and his opponents will think they have foiled the overthrow of power by assassinating him. But they will find out later he was merely a decoy and that they played into the plans of the Antichrist.

The Antichrist will initially obtain power in his own sphere, Asia, and the Middle East. As he grows out of this arena, and into Europe, the next step will be into the Mediterranean, his area of strength. Because of his Middle Eastern heritage he will have already united North Africans, who are sympathetic to his cultural background, with his Asian and Middle Eastern conglomerate.

Fiasco from communication breakdown between two superpowers

(Century II, Quatrains 35 and 48)

Through a mistake, a breakdown in communications between two powerful countries will occur. The situation is a lot more complex than will appear on the surface. The leader involved will feel great regret about what happened and will want to continue his career and help correct the situation, to help make up for the adverse affects.

But he will be hung, symbolically, by others wishing to take his position in the organization. He will be hung as far as politics and his career are concerned. It will almost be like committing suicide because in the end he will be a broken man. The entire event will be viewed as a fiasco from both sides. It will have very harmful and even cataclysmic consequences.

Third world country leader creates strife
(Century III, Quatrain 60)

A "young dark man" will arise as a leader in a Third World country; his main goal is to unite the other Third World countries to do battle with the superpowers. The area of conflict will be in Eastern Europe and the Middle East, particularly around the Adriatic and the Caspian seas and Israel. No definite winner will emerge but the strife will help set the stage for the Antichrist. Many prophecies in the Bible refer to events in this region.

Antichrist profits from radar research in Europe
(Century I, Quatrain 6)

Research on a more sophisticated type of radar and sensing devices will give greater information to the operator, i.e. an airplane pilot. But the first experiments with the technology will fail in a disastrous accident, when the vibrations emitted by the device cause the chassis of the plane to become weakened and dangerous. The scientists involved with the research will have to temporarily abandon the research because of diplomatic breakdowns, the threat of war, etc.

This will take place before the Antichrist comes to full power. It will happen in Europe at the time the Antichrist is strengthening his base of power in the Middle East. The devices are currently under development but have not been tested yet. But this is another historical event that will permit the Antichrist to take over Europe.

War game simulation by Britain in Europe leads to disaster
(Century II, Quatrain 2)

In a war-game maneuver involving Great Britain and European troops a malfunctioning computer will cause the "real-world" situation to play out instead of the simulation. As a result of the error actual defenses will be activated and real bombs will be dropped on the areas of the game and cause a tragic international incident.

American Electoral College voting stalemate
(Century VII, Quatrain 41)

The presidents of the United States, a supposedly free country, have been abusing their power to an increasingly greater extent. During a time of social unrest even more so than the period of Vietnam and Watergate, the Electoral College will be evenly split over the election of the new president. The process will stalemate, with many people clamoring for whichever candidate they voted for, causing enormous tension in the country. Internationally it will be a sensitive situation.

Because of the split, and the extremely volatile and explosive social unrest, putting either candidate in office instead of the other could start a civil war or a revolution. After a long time of impassioned speeches invoking patriotism and the founding fathers, a compromise solution of holding another election will be taken, and a candidate will be installed without disaster.

The Center of the Universe...

There are some people – I’m not naming names (Diane?) – who think the universe revolves around them. In fact, for most of humankind, everybody thought that. It’s only been in the last few hundred years that scientists finally puzzled out that the Earth isn’t the centre of the universe at all. That begs the question: where is the centre?

Click here for an interesting Podcast.

Photos of Total Lunar Eclipse

Follow the link to see a great gallery of photos of the recent lunar eclipse.

I sure miss football...



DURHAM — From the little town of Bedford, N.H., to the pages of Sports Illustrated's Swimsuit Issue, New England Patriots cheerleader Meghan White has got it going on.

White, a University of New Hampshire communications major and English journalism minor, was one of 12 NFL cheerleaders to appear in the 2008 Sport Illustrated's annual swimsuit edition.

It was the magazine's first swimsuit edition to feature NFL cheerleaders.

The 2004 Manchester West High School graduate, who was born and raised in Bedford, said she had to keep her appearance in Sports Illustrated under wraps for several months before it hit newsstands earlier this month.

"I found out last May when flying home from our 2008 (Patriots) calendar shooting," White said in a phone interview. "I was shocked ... It was hard to keep it under wraps for so long."

White, who has been on the Patriots cheerleading squad for two seasons now, said the one-day shoot took place in Manhattan.

"It was a great experience," White said, adding she still has to flip to the cover of the magazine when she sees the picture to make sure it's Sports Illustrated she's looking at. "There's a lot of work that goes into it, and you just have to put your trust in your editors that they pick the right picture."

The 11 other cheerleaders were from teams throughout the league, including the Miami Dolphins, San Diego Chargers and the Oakland Raiders.

White, an avid dancer, trained for 10 years at the Bedford Dance Center and was a member of the UNH Dance Company her freshman and sophomore years.

But she had never done any cheering before auditioning for the Patriots squad in 2006.

"I just wanted to try something knew and expand upon what I love most, which is performing," said White.

She went into the auditions with no expectations but came out as a member of the squad. The audition process includes part dancing and part personal interview, said White, and focuses on overall physical fitness.

Besides attending practices twice a week and games when she can, all while juggling the schedule of a full-time student, White travels across the world with the squad. Those trips promote the Patriots and American football. During her travels, she's been to China and to visit American troops in Iraq, Turkey, Germany and England during Operation Seasons Greetings, an event held last Thanksgiving.

"When I went to visit the troops overseas, that was probably the most humbling thing I've ever had to do," she said.

White, a news junkie and sports fan, said she's pursuing a career in broadcast journalism, though she doesn't know if she wants to be "on camera or off."

"Growing up in a household where athletics played where a big part, I always liked sports broadcasting," she said.

Super Bowl XLII was tough in the White household; Meghan's father, Joe, is a New York Giants fan.

"I did have a better seat than my dad," said White, who was at the game. She said it was a pretty competitive atmosphere before and after the game between the two.

"I let him have his glory," said White about the loss. "And hopefully we can get his team next year."

Joe jokes that there was a "DMZ (demilitarized zone) in the house" for a while.

His daughter has had quite an experience with the Patriots, he said, doing things she might not have been able to do otherwise, like traveling around the world.

"She's really gotten to travel quite a distance, where she wouldn't normally if she wasn't a (Patriots) cheerleader," he said.

And the Sports Illustrated shoot was just the tip of the iceberg.

"We were totally shocked," Joe said, referring to the reaction he and his wife, Anne, had when they found out Meghan would be in the magazine.

White said she'll be auditioning for her third and final year with the Patriots cheerleading squad this spring. In the meantime, she's sending out resumes in pursuit of a career in broadcasting.

The 2008 Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue is on newsstands now.

Political Humor

HILLARY'S FIRST NIGHT AS PRESIDENT.
In January 2009 Hillary Clinton gets elected President,
and is spending her first night in the White House.
She has waited so long.......... The ghost of George Washington appears,
and Hillary says, "How can I best serve my country?"
Washington says, "Never tell a lie."
"Ouch!" Says Hillary, "I don't know about that."
The next night, the ghost of Thomas Jefferson appears...
Hillary says, "How can I best serve my country?"
Jefferson says, "Listen to the people."
"Ohhh! I really don't want to do that."
On the third night, the ghost of Abe Lincoln appears..
Hillary says, "How can I best serve my country?"
Lincoln says, "Go to the theater."

On A Lighter Note...Again!

Students in an advanced Biology class were taking their mid-term exam.
The last question was, "Name seven advantages of Mother's Milk," worth
70 points or none at all.
One student , in particular, was hard put to think of seven advantages.
He wrote:
1.) It is perfect formula for the child.
2.) It provides immunity against several diseases.
3.) It is always the right temperature.
4.) It is inexpensive.
5.) It bonds the child to mother, and vice versa.
6.) It is always available as needed.
And then, the student was stuck. Finally, in desperation, just before
the bell indicating the end of the test rang, he wrote...
7.) It comes in cute containers.
He got an A

Ass Clowns Anyone?

Clinton, Obama. Clinton, Obama. Clinton, Obama. Clinton, Obama.

McCain looks better everyday.

Highlights include:
Clinton massacred the name of the new Russian Deputy Prime Minister, stumbling at one point as she tried to pronounce the name of Dmitry Medvedev, Russia's first deputy prime minister, who is expected to win an election to succeed President Vladimir Putin on Sunday. "Whatever," she said after several attempts to demonstrate she knew his name.

Good politics, Hillaryous! I can see that bitch with her hand in front of her face - "Whatever."

Not Fair! Not Fair! The Media is Not Fair!
Clinton said, "In the last several debates I seem to get the first question all the time. I don't mind. I'll be happy to field it. I just find it curious if anybody saw "Saturday Night Live," maybe we should ask Barack if he's comfortable and needs another pillow."
In its episode last Saturday, the comedy show ran a feature portraying the news media as going easy on Obama, and a questioner asking at one point if he was comfortable and needed another pillow.

Not Fair! The Media is too nice to you, Mr. B. Hussein Obama....WHAAAAAAAAAA! here comes the WHAMMMMMMBULANCE!!!!!

Surprised she didn't pop out a tear or two....

Tuesday, February 26, 2008

Yes, We Can't

Yes, We Can't
From Ralph Waldo Emerson to Deval Patrick, the politics of hope have been a bust.
25 February 2008

Aging baby boomers see in Barack Obama's down-the-line liberal voting record the promise of a left-wing revival. The college students and twentysomethings of the Millennial Generation see in him a way of pushing the quarrelsome, narcissistic baby boomers off the stage. Someone is bound to be disappointed by this extraordinary performance artist. But what both the boomers and the Millennials share is a desire to be part of what Ralph Waldo Emerson, writing in the 1840s, called "the politics of hope." Emerson wrote during a time of numerous experiments in utopian living. Obama—whose candidacy rests upon a standard utopian dichotomy between the earthly evils of poverty, injustice, war, and partisanship, and the promise of the world to come if we allow him to rescue us—appeals to the same Elysian strain in American and Western political life, largely in remission since 1980, when the 1960s truly ended.

America's founding fathers were a famously hard-headed lot; they understood that government had to be structured to remedy the "defects of better motives." Since self-serving interest groups—or factions, as Federalist 10 calls them—were an unavoidable element of liberty, interest could only be checked by competing interest. But while this insight is the main stem of our political tradition, there is another, albeit punctuated, branch—a utopianism that derives from the millenarianism of the sects that emerged from the Protestant Reformation and eventually populated America. "Utopian . . . ideas," notes Daniel Flynn in his new history of the American Left, are as "American as Plymouth Rock." This is why, as Sixties activist Bo Burlingham put it, "the Left bobs up and down in American history, a battered and leaky craft which often disappears beneath the tide, but somehow never sinks."

In the wake of bloody utopian experiments in 1930s Europe, a slew of erudite authors launched compelling attacks on them. Jacob Talmon, Karl Popper, Raymond Aaron, Czeslaw Milosz, and Hannah Arendt laid waste to the historical, philosophical, sociological, and literary assumptions that supported communism and fascism. But their arguments didn't endure, despite their power. By the mid-1960s, utopianism had again taken hold, and its lure was such that even Arendt, once a vocal opponent, found herself drawn to the religion of politics. Propelled by her disdain for America in general and the Vietnam War in particular, as well as the promise, as she saw it, of worker-control experiments in Europe, she effectively reversed much of her earlier writings.

She wasn't alone. In 1949, Arthur Schlesinger had published The Vital Center, the canonical statement of disillusioned, empirical, and anti-utopian post–World War II liberalism. Schlesinger praised "the empirical temper" and a realistic sense of man's limitations that recognized that "freedom means conflict." Tracing the shared assumptions behind Brook Farm—the famous American utopian experiment of the 1840s—and the Soviet Union, he distanced liberalism from an optimism born of eighteenth-century rationalism and a nineteenth-century romanticism about progress, which left "too many unprepared for the mid-twentieth century." Democracy, he wrote, "brooks no worship" of great leaders because "it knows that no man is that good." And Schlesinger rebuked the leftists who, admiring the USSR, couldn't believe that "ugly facts underlie fair words." It was an intellectual tour de force.

But a little more than a decade later, Schlesinger—romanced by John F. Kennedy—walked away from these arguments. His admiration for the liberalism of a "moderate pessimism about man" was replaced by hero-worship and a sense of the dashing, aristocratic, articulate Kennedy as someone who could transcend standard political categories. Kennedy's untimely death canonized the hard-nosed Massachusetts pol—with a mixed record at best as our first celebrity president—as JFK, a Lincoln-like martyr to civil rights, the King of Camelot who, if he had lived, would have made all right with the world. This Kennedy passed into Democratic Party legend and still inspires some today: remember Bill Clinton's 1992 campaign ads, featuring a picture of the young Clinton visiting the White House with a group of young student leaders and shaking hands with Kennedy. Kennedy, the ads implied, was passing the torch.

Obama, the celebrity-like candidate drawing on his generational appeal and noble bearing, fits better into Kennedy's robes than Clinton did. Unlike Kennedy, who didn't think of himself in messianic terms, Obama seems short on irony. Still, for lovelorn boomers and for youngsters who've known only the failures of the Bush years, Obama promises a Camelot-like reenchantment with politics. "I've been following politics since I was about five," says TV host Chris Mathews. "I've never seen anything like this. This is bigger than Kennedy. [Obama] comes along, and he seems to have the answers, he's the New Testament." In this view, just as Kennedy's victory in 1960 brought the country out of its Eisenhower-era stupor and put the Catholic question to bed for good, so an Obama victory will reenergize our politics and bring an end to poverty and racial division.

Hillary Clinton has searched in vain for a way to combat Obama's appeal. In the recent Austin debate, she criticized Obama for borrowing generously from the speeches of his good friend and coeval Deval Patrick, the first African-American governor of Massachusetts. "Lifting whole passages from someone else's speeches," she challenged in the debate's one charged moment, "is not change you can believe in, it's change you can Xerox." Clinton's arrow here was not aimed so much at plagiarism—all candidates borrow heavily from each other and from past campaigns—as at Obama's claim to authenticity. But with the press, on both left and right, all but openly rooting for Obama, little came of her attack; more important, the press missed the true importance of the Patrick comparison.

Bay State journalist Rick Holmes describes Obama and Patrick, fellow Harvard Law School graduates, as "peas in a pod." Patrick is the Obama campaign's national cochair. Obama's presidential campaign has modeled itself on Patrick's gubernatorial campaign. Patrick's 2006 campaign slogan was "Together we can," while Obama's is "Yes we can." The brilliant Chicago political operative David Axelrod has managed both men's campaigns. Both candidates have made persistent appeals to "the politics of hope."

So Clinton's criticism seems an opportune moment to ask how Patrick's inspirational rhetoric has translated into governing a state where Democrats control both houses of the legislature—the likely scenario for Obama, too, should he take office. Patrick's governorship is the closest thing we have to a preview of the "politics of hope"—and that governorship has been a failure to date. As Joan Vennochi observes in the Boston Globe, "Democrats who control the Legislature ignored virtually every major budget and policy initiative presented by a fellow Democrat." Patrick's record in office, Vennochi concludes, "shows that it can be hard to get beyond being the face of change, to actually changing politics." His stock has sunk so markedly that Hillary Clinton carried the state handily against Obama in the Democratic primary despite, or perhaps because of, Patrick's support for his political doppelgänger.

In one area, however, Patrick has achieved some of his goals. In thrall to the state's teachers' unions, he has partly rolled back the most successful educational reforms in the country. Most states gamed the federal testing requirements that were part of President Bush's No Child Left Behind Act. But Massachusetts, thanks to Republican governors William Weld and Mitt Romney, created the Office of Educational Quality and Accountability to ensure that the state's testing methods conformed closely to the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)—federal tests that are the gold standard for measuring educational outcomes. In 2007, Massachusetts became the first state to achieve top marks in all four categories of student achievement. One of Patrick's first efforts as governor was to eliminate the Office of Educational Quality and Accountability.

Patrick hasn't delivered reform, much less the transformation that both he and Obama promise. This should come as no surprise. Obama's utopian vision of transcending the interests that make up the fabric of our democracy is unlikely to fare any better than the "politics of hope" did in Emerson's time. The key question at hand is whether Obama's Edenic bubble bursts before or after the election.

Fred Siegel is a contributing editor of City Journal and a professor of history at the Cooper Union for Science and Art.

The Open and Shut Case Against Hillary Clinton

A key component of Hillary Clinton's campaign message is that she would be tougher on foreign policy than Barack Obama. She has spent a lifetime constructing this hawkish image (see Mike's excellent piece from last year on the formation of Hillary's views on the exercise of American power), in full knowledge that she would have to neutralize fears of her being a radical peacenik if she ever wished to make a serious run for president. Remember last August (how can you forget?) when she chided Barack Obama as "irresponsible and naive" for saying he would meet with America's enemies?

If there is only one article that you read today -- or this week -- make it Debra Burlingame's op-ed in the Wall Street Journal. It concerns the pardon that President Clinton handed out to 16 members of FALN, a Puerto Rican terrorist group that was resonsible for a string of armed robberies as well as 146 bombings that killed 9 people and injured hundreds in its quixotic fight for independence from the United States. Some 25 years before another, far more devastating terrorist attack on Lower Manhattan, FALN planted a bomb in the Fraunces Tavern restaurant which detonated during lunch-hour, killing 4 and injuring 60, it's most infamous and deadly attack.

This was truly the sleaziest of Clinton's pardons (which is saying something). But it lacked the glitz and intrigue of the Marc Rich pardon, and perhaps for that reason, it is among the less notorious. But the FALN pardon was indisputably the worst. Rich, after all, was just another example of money corrupting politics. The FALN pardon was far worse; it represented nothing less than the surrender of American honor and prestige to terrorists for political gain. Its effect -- in the midst of the African embassy bombings, the attack on the USS Cole, Khobar Towers et. al. -- was to confirm Osama bin Laden's declaration two years later that the United States was a "weak horse." The U.S. Sentencing Commission, the FBI, the Bureau of Prisons and the U.S. Attorney all opposed the pardon. Even the terrorists themselves -- who, after all, did not recognize the legal jurisdiction of the United States (the reason why they waged war against it) -- did not request the pardon.  

How does Hillary fit into all of this? Well, she is the reason -- the only reason -- that the pardon was ever granted. She had a senate race to win, after all, in a state with over 1 million Spanish-speaking voters. Characteristic of White House thinking at the time was an email sent by an adviser concluding that the pardons would be "fairly easy to accomplish and will have a positive impact among strategic communities in the U.S. (read, voters)." One can already imagine the attack ads that the McCain campaign and the RNC are devising right now, if they haven't produced them already. God forbid Hillary wins the nomination, they will be a welcome addition to the public discussion about who Hillary Clinton is and what ultimately drives her, lest anyone genuinely believe she's in this because "It's about our country. It's about our kids' future. It's about all of us together." I should admit at this point that I've been largely ambivalent about the Democratic primary, and have never understood the Hillary-hatred that drives the right. But, after reading Burlingame's piece, how can anyone trust the Clintons in power? To use one of Hillary's rhetorical flourishes when she questioned the honesty of General David Petraeus last year, that this woman would claim to be tougher than Barack Obama in dealing with America's Islamist enemies when she and her husband sold out the country and its honor to a bunch of two-bit, Hispanic terrorists "requires the willing suspension of disblief."

--James Kirchick

The Clinton Pardons

The Clintons' Terror Pardons

By DEBRA BURLINGAME
February 12, 2008; Page A17

It was nearly 10 p.m. on New Year's Eve, 1982. Two officers on New York Police Department's elite bomb squad rushed to headquarters at One Police Plaza, where minutes earlier an explosion had destroyed the entrance to the building. Lying amid the carnage was Police Officer Rocco Pascarella, his lower leg blasted off.

"He was ripped up like someone took a box cutter and shredded his face," remembered Detective Anthony Senft, one of the bomb-squad officers who answered the call 25 years ago. "We really didn't even know that he was a uniformed man until we found his weapon, that's how badly he was injured."

[The Clintons' Terror Pardons]

About 20 minutes later, Mr. Senft and his partner, Richard Pastorella, were blown 15 feet in the air as they knelt in protective gear to defuse another bomb. Detective Senft was blinded in one eye, his facial bones shattered, his hip severely fractured. Mr. Pastorella was blinded in both eyes and lost all the fingers of his right hand. A total of four bombs exploded in a single hour on that night, including at FBI headquarters in Manhattan and the federal courthouse in Brooklyn.

The perpetrators were members of Armed Forces of National Liberation, FALN (the Spanish acronym), a clandestine terrorist group devoted to bringing about independence for Puerto Rico through violent means. Its members waged war on America with bombings, arson, kidnappings, prison escapes, threats and intimidation. The most gruesome attack was the 1975 Fraunces Tavern bombing in Lower Manhattan. Timed to go off during the lunch-hour rush, the explosion decapitated one of the four people killed and injured another 60.

[The Clintons' Terror Pardon]

FALN bragged about the bloodbath, calling the victims "reactionary corporate executives" and threatening: "You have unleashed a storm from which you comfortable Yankees can't escape." By 1996, the FBI had linked FALN to 146 bombings and a string of armed robberies -- a reign of terror that resulted in nine deaths and hundreds of injured victims.

On Aug. 7, 1999, the one-year anniversary of the U.S. African embassy bombings that killed 257 people and injured 5,000, President Bill Clinton reaffirmed his commitment to the victims of terrorism, vowing that he "will not rest until justice is done." Four days later, while Congress was on summer recess, the White House quietly issued a press release announcing that the president was granting clemency to 16 imprisoned members of FALN. What began as a simple paragraph on the AP wire exploded into a major controversy.

Mr. Clinton justified the clemencies by asserting that the sentences were disproportionate to the crimes. None of the petitioners, he stated, had been directly involved in crimes that caused bodily harm to anyone. "For me," the president concluded, "the question, therefore, was whether their continuing incarceration served any meaningful purpose."

His comments, including the astonishing claim that the FALN prisoners were being unfairly punished because of "guilt by association," were widely condemned as a concession to terrorists. Further, they were seen as an outrageous slap in the face of the victims and a bitter betrayal of the cops and federal law enforcement officers who had put their lives on the line to protect the public and who had invested years of their careers to put these people behind bars. The U.S. Sentencing Commission affirmed a pre-existing Justice Department assessment that the sentences, ranging from 30 to 90 years, were "in line with sentences imposed in other cases for similar terrorist activity."

The prisoners were convicted on a variety of charges that included conspiracy, sedition, violation of the Hobbes Act (extortion by force, violence or fear), armed robbery and illegal possession of weapons and explosives -- including large quantities of C-4 plastic explosive, dynamite and huge caches of ammunition. Mr. Clinton's action was opposed by the FBI, the Bureau of Prisons, the U.S. attorney offices that prosecuted the cases and the victims whose lives had been shattered. In contravention of standard procedures, none of these agencies, victims or families of victims were consulted or notified prior to the president's announcement.

"I know the chilling evidence that convicted the petitioners," wrote Deborah Devaney, one of the federal prosecutors who spent years on the cases. "The conspirators made every effort to murder and maim. . . . A few dedicated federal agents are the only people who stood in their way."

Observed Judge George Layton, who sentenced four FALN defendants for their conspiracy to use military-grade explosives to break an FALN leader from Ft. Leavenworth Penitentiary and detonate bombs at other public buildings, "[T]his case . . . represents one of the finest examples of preventive law enforcement that has ever come to this court's attention in the 20-odd years it has been a judge and in the 20 years before that as a practicing lawyer in criminal cases."

The FBI cracked the cases with the discovery of an FALN safe house and bomb factory. Video surveillance showed two of those on the clemency list firing weapons and building bombs intended for an imminent attack at a U.S. military installation. FBI agents obtained a warrant and entered the premises, surreptitiously disarming the bombs whose components bore the unmistakable FALN signature. They found 24 pounds of dynamite, 24 blasting caps, weapons, disguises, false IDs and thousands of rounds of ammunition.

A total of six safe houses were ultimately uncovered. Seven hundred hours of surveillance video were recorded, resulting in a mountain of evidence connecting the 16 prisoners to multiple FALN operations past and present.

Federal law enforcement agencies considered these individuals so dangerous, extraordinary security precautions were taken at their numerous trials. Courthouse elevators were restricted and no one, including the court officers, was permitted to carry a firearm in the courtroom.

Given all this, why would Bill Clinton, who had ignored the 3,226 clemency petitions that had piled up on his desk over the years, suddenly reach into the stack and pluck out these 16 meritless cases? (The New York Times ran a column with the headline, "Bill's Little Gift.")

Hillary Rodham Clinton was in the midst of her state-wide "listening tour" in anticipation of her run for the U.S. Senate in New York, a state which included 1.3 million Hispanics. Three members of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus -- Luis V. Gutierrez (D., Ill.), Jose E. Serrano, (D., N.Y.) and Nydia M. Velazquez, (D., N.Y.) -- along with local Hispanic politicians and leftist human-rights advocates, had been agitating for years on behalf of the FALN cases directly to the White House and first lady.

Initial reports stated that Mrs. Clinton supported the clemencies, but when public reaction went negative she changed course, issuing a short statement three weeks after the clemencies were announced. The prisoners' delay in refusing to renounce violence "speaks volumes," she said.

The Clintons were caught in an awkward predicament of their own making. The president had ignored federal guidelines for commutation of sentences, including the most fundamental: The prisoners hadn't actually asked for clemency.

To push the deal through, signed statements renouncing violence and expressing remorse were required by the Justice Department. The FALN prisoners, surely relishing the embarrassment and discomfiture they were causing the president and his wife, had previously declined to accept these conditions. Committed and unrepentant militants who did not accept the authority of the United States, they refused to apologize for activities they were proud of in order to obtain a clemency they never requested.

So desperate was the White House to get the deal finalized and out of the news, an unprecedented 16-way conference call was set up for the "petitioners" who were locked up in 11 different federal facilities so that they could strategize a response to the president's offer. Two eventually refused to renounce their cause, preferring to serve out their lengthy sentences rather than follow the White House script.

Mr. Clinton's fecklessness in the handling of these cases was demonstrated by the fact that none of the prisoners were required, as a standard condition of release, to cooperate in ongoing investigations of countless unsolved FALN bombing cases and other crimes. Mrs. Clinton's so-called disagreement with her husband on the matter made no mention of that fact. The risk of demanding such a requirement, of course, was that the prisoners might have proudly implicated themselves, causing the entire enterprise to implode, with maximum damage to the president and potentially sinking Hillary Clinton's Senate chances.

Meanwhile, Puerto Rican politicians in New York who'd been crowing to their constituents about the impending release of these "freedom fighters" were enraged and insulted at Hillary Clinton's withdrawal of support. "It was a horrible blunder," said State Sen. Olga A. Mendez. "She needs to learn the rules."

The first lady called her failure to consult the Puerto Rican political establishment before assessing the entire issue a mistake "that will never happen again" -- even as the cops who had been maimed and disfigured by FALN operations continued to be ignored. Tom and Joe Connor, two brothers who were little boys when their 33-year-old father, Frank, was killed in the Fraunces Tavern attack, were dumbstruck to learn that White House staffers referred to the FALN militants as "political prisoners" and were planning a meeting with their children to humanize their plight.

Members of Congress viewed the clemencies as a dangerous abuse of presidential power that could not go unchallenged. Resolutions condemning the president's action were passed with a vote of 95-2 in the Senate, 311-41 in the House. It was the most they could do; the president's pardon power, conferred by the Constitution, is absolute. The House launched an investigation, subpoenaing records from the White House and Justice in an effort to determine whether proper procedure had been followed. President Clinton promptly invoked executive privilege, putting Justice Department lawyers in the impossible position of admitting that they had sent the White House a recommendation on the issue, but barred from disclosing what it was.

Twenty-four hours before a scheduled Senate committee hearing, the DOJ withheld the FBI's written statement about the history of the FALN and an assessment of its current terrorist capability. "They pulled the plug on us," said an unnamed FBI official in a news report, referring to the Justice Department decision to prevent FBI testimony.

The investigation revealed that the White House was driving the effort to release the prisoners, rather than the other way around. White House aides created talking points and strategies for a public campaign on the prisoners' behalf included asking prominent individuals for letters supporting clemency.

Jeffrey Farrow, a key adviser on the White House Interagency Working Group for Puerto Rico recommended meetings with the president and the three leading members of Congressional Hispanic Caucus who were pushing the effort, stating in a March 6, 1999 email, "This is Gutierrez's [sic] top priority as well as of high constituent importance to Serrano and Velazquez." The next day, White House Deputy Chief of Staff Maria Echaveste sent an email to White House Counsel Charles Ruff, who was handling the clemency issue, supporting Mr. Farrow's view, saying, "Chuck -- Jeff's right about this -- very hot issue." Another adviser in the Working Group, Mayra Martinez-Fernandez, noted that releasing the prisoners would be "fairly easy to accomplish and will have a positive impact among strategic communities in the U.S. (read, voters)."

And there you have it. Votes.

While the pardon scandals that marked Bill and Hillary Clinton's final days in office are remembered as transactions involving cronies, criminals and campaign contributors, the FALN clemencies of 1999 should be remembered in the context of the increasing threat of domestic and transnational terrorism that was ramping up during the Clinton years of alleged peace and prosperity. To wit, the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, the 1995 Tokyo subway Sarin attack, the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, the 1995 "Bojinka" conspiracy to hijack airplanes and crash them into buildings, the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing, the 1996 Summer Olympics bombing, Osama bin Laden's 1996 and 1998 "Declarations of War" on America, the 1998 East African embassy bombings, the 2000 USS Sullivans bombing attempt, the 2000 USS Cole bombing, and the 2000 Millennium bombing plot.

It was within that context that the FBI gave its position on the FALN clemencies -- which the White House succeeded in keeping out of news coverage but ultimately failed to suppress -- stating that "the release of these individuals will psychologically and operationally enhance the ongoing violent and criminal activities of terrorist groups, not only in Puerto Rico, but throughout the world." The White House spun the clemencies as a sign of the president's universal commitment to "peace and reconciliation" just one year after Osama bin Laden told his followers that the United States is a "paper tiger" that can be attacked with impunity.

It would be a mistake to dismiss as "old news" the story of how and why these terrorists were released in light of the fact that it took place during the precise period when Bill Clinton now claims he was avidly engaged, even "obsessed," with efforts to protect the public from clandestine terrorist attacks. If Bill and Hillary Clinton were willing to pander to the demands of local Hispanic politicians and leftist human-rights activists defending bomb-makers convicted of seditious conspiracy, how might they stand up to pressure from other interest groups working in less obvious ways against U.S. interests in a post-9/11 world?

Radical Islamists are a sophisticated and determined enemy who understand that violence alone will not achieve their goals. Islamist front groups, representing themselves as rights organizations, are attempting to get a foothold here as they have already in parts of Western Europe by deftly exploiting ethnic and racial politics, agitating under the banner of civil liberties even as they are clamoring for the imposition of special Shariah law privileges in the public domain. They believe that the road to America's ultimate defeat is through the back door of policy and law and they are aggressively using money, influence and retail politics to achieve their goal.

On the campaign trail, the Clintons like to say that Bill is merely supportive and enthusiastic, "just like all the other candidates' spouses." Nothing could be further from the truth. Returning Bill and Hillary Clinton to the White House would present the country with the unprecedented situation of a former and current president simultaneously occupying the White House, the practical implications of which have yet to be fully explored.

The FALN clemencies provide a disturbing example of how the abuse or misuse of presidential prerogative, under the guise of policy, can be put in service of the personal and private activities of the president's spouse -- and beyond the reach of meaningful congressional oversight.

Ms. Burlingame, a former attorney and a director of the World Trade Center Memorial Foundation, is the sister of Charles F. "Chic" Burlingame III, the pilot of American Airlines flight 77, which was crashed into the Pentagon on Sept. 11, 2001.

It's a Hillabuster!

Senatorial Candidate Hillary Clinton pledged to create 200,000 new jobs in upstate New York. Once in office, she not only neglected this nearly impossible goal -- but voted against tax cuts that would have helped upstate New York
 
I wonder what other lies she is telling...
 
Busted!

Scientists stymied over 'Sperm Revolt'; Aggressive spermicide to blame!

Harvard University - Scientists at this prestigious university are stymied over the recent and widespread sperm 'revolt' that has plagued millions of adult men. "It is a first!" Says Dr. Manuel Priapus, director of Erectionology, as he tried to explain the sudden absence of available sperm samples.

He added, "Yes, they are indeed hiding! It's like they've suddenly become afraid and refuse to leave the safe confines they are use to!"

Others blame the recent addition of powerful 'seek and destroy' spermacides that have recently been marketed under the brand name 'No Fetus Can Beat Us' spermacide.

One scientific group claim it's the advent of a much broader revolt, where not only sperm will seek recognition of being persecuted, but also all men in general!

"We feel this is a direct connection to the feminism movement and their aggressive tactics toward men and reproduction," quipped Lars Reingold, Pontifax of Le Temple de Priape. "We are considering a recommendation that this be handled by the UN Forum for Human Suffering, and appropriate charges be instituted at once

Monday, February 25, 2008

The Lie

The ecstasy of Barack

By Kathleen Parker

WASHINGTON — Much has been made of the religious tenor of Barack Obama's presidential campaign.

Reports of women weeping and swooning — even of an audience applauding when The One cleared his proboscis (blew his nose for you mortals) — have become frequent events in the heavenly realm of Obi-Wan Obama.

His rhetoric, meanwhile, drips with hints of resurrection, redemption and second comings. “We are the ones we've been waiting for," he said on Super Tuesday night. And his people were glad.

Actually, they were hysterical, the word that best describes what surrounds this young savior and that may be more apt than we imagine. The word is derived from the Greek hystera, or womb. The ancient Greeks considered hysteria a psychoneurosis peculiar to women caused by disturbances of the uterus.

Well, you don't see any men fainting in Obi's presence.

Barack Obama has many appealing qualities, not least his own reluctance to be swaddled in purple. Nothing quite says, “I'm only human” like whipping out a hankie and blowing one's nose in front of 17,000 admirers. The audience's applause was reportedly awkward, as if the crowd was both approving of anything their savior did, but a little disappointed at this rather ungodly behavior.

So what is the source of this infatuation with Obama? How to explain the hysteria? The religious fervor? The devotion? The weeping and fainting and utter euphoria surrounding a candidate who had the audacity to run for leader of the free world on a platform of mere hope?

If anthropologists made predictions the way meteorologists do, they might have anticipated Obama's astronomical rise to supernova status in 2008 of the Common Era. Consider the cultural coordinates, and Obama's intersection with history becomes almost inevitable.

To play weatherman for a moment, he is a perfect storm of the culture of narcissism, the cult of celebrity, and a secular society in which fathers (both the holy and the secular) have been increasingly marginalized from the lives of a generation of young Americans.

All of these trends have been gaining momentum the past few decades. Social critic Christopher Lasch named the culture of narcissism a generation ago and cited addiction to celebrity as one of the disease's symptoms — all tied to the decline of the family.

That culture has merely become more exaggerated as spiritual alienation and fatherlessness have collided with technology (YouTube, Facebook, MySpace, etc.) that enables the self-absorption of the narcissistic personality.

Grown-ups with decades under their double chins may have a variety of reasons for supporting Obama, but the youth who pack convention halls and stadiums as if for a rock concert constitute a tipping point of another order.

One of Obama's TV ads, set to rock ‘n’ roll, has a Woodstock feel to it. Text alternating with crowd scenes reads: “We Can Change The World” and “We Can Save The Planet."

Those are some kind of campaign promises. The kind no mortal could possibly keep, but never mind. Obi-Wan Obama is about hope — and hope, he'll tell you, knows no limits.

It is thus no surprise that the young are enamored of Obama. He's a rock star. A telegenic, ultra-bright redeemer fluent in the planetary language of a cosmic generation. The force is with him.

But underpinning that popularity is something that transcends mere policy or politics. It is hunger, and that hunger is clearly spiritual. Human beings seem to have a yearning for the transcendent — hence thousands of years of religion — but we have lately shied away from traditional approaches and old gods.

Thus, in post-Judeo-Christian America, the sports club is the new church. Global warming is the new religion. Vegetarianism is the new sacrament. Hooking up, the new prayer. Talk therapy, the new witnessing. Tattooing and piercing, the new sacred symbols and rituals.

And apparently, Barack Obama is the new messiah.

Here's how a 20-year-old woman in Seattle described that Obama feeling: “When he was talking about hope, it actually almost made me cry. Like it really made sense, like, for the first, like, whoa ... "

This New Age glossolalia may be more sonorous than the guttural emanations from the revival tent, but the emotion is the same. It's all religion by any other name.

Whatever the Church of Obama promises, we should not mistake this movement for a renaissance of reason. It is more like, well, like whoa.

Nader

PROVIDENCE, R.I. - Consumer advocate Ralph Nader announced yesterday he's running for president, a move that isn't likely to put him in the White House but that could shave votes from the Democratic nominee in November's election.

Nader, who ran as the Green Party candidate for president in 2000, announced his White House intentions on NBC's "Meet the Press" yesterday.

Hillary Rodham Clinton said Nader's bid would be bad for whichever Democrat ultimately faces likely Republican nominee Sen. John McCain in November.

She called Nader's candidacy "a passing fancy" but conceded the only party likely to be hurt by it was the Democrats, adding, "I can't think of any Republicans that would vote for him."

Nader, 73, said he is running because mainstream candidates are too closely tied to corporate America. "The issue is do they have the moral courage, do they have the fortitude to stand up against the corporate powers and get things done for the American people?" Nader said. "We need to shift the power from the few to the many."

Sen. Barack Obama dismissed Nader's latest candidacy at a news conference in Ohio, calling him a perennial presidential campaigner. "He thought that there was no difference between Al Gore and George Bush, and eight years later I think people realize that Ralph did not know what he was talking about," Obama said.

Nader has appeared on ballots as a third-party presidential candidate in 1996, 2000 and 2004 - each time taking only a fraction of the vote. In 1996 and 2004 he won around 1 percent of the popular vote. In 2000, he garnered 2.7 percent - which some blame for Gore's loss.

"His being on the Green Party prevented Al Gore from being the greenest president we could have had and I think that's really unfortunate," Clinton told reporters on her campaign plane yesterday.

Robert Zimmerman, Gore's New York State managing chair in 2000, put it more forcefully: "Ralph Nader's legacy is the criminal negligence and corruption of the Bush administration."

During the NBC appearance, Nader downplayed concerns this would occur again. "If Democrats can't landslide the Republicans this year, they ought to just wrap up, close down, emerge in a different form."

Nader first made a name for himself writing "Unsafe at Any Speed," a 1965 book that spurred the passage of tougher safety standards for passenger vehicles, and he fought to curtail misleading advertising and place warning labels on cigarettes.

"It is quite presumptuous of him to believe he's qualified to be president of the United States because he annoyed a bunch of companies a few years ago," said Matt Bennett of Third Way, a left-leaning Washington think tank.

Bennett said Nader's run doesn't present the same kind of threat to mainstream candidates as the one mulled by New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg because Nader lacks executive experience. "Nader is running on his reputation as a gadfly," Bennett said.

Still, some observers said a third candidate could potentially gum up the electoral works.

"In a couple of close states in November his presence could conceivably tilt results in one way or another," said Andrew Polsky, a political-science professor at Hunter College in New York. "He tends to draw slightly more liberal voters. And in a close election that could make a significant difference."

Clinton stopped in Rhode Island yesterday for a fundraiser and two campaign events where she pushed her plan to reform health care and kept up pressure on Obama, whose hopeful rhetoric she parodied for a crowd at a college here.

"Now I can stand up here and say: 'Let's just get everybody together. Let's get unified.' The sky will open, the light will come down, celestial choirs will be singing, and everyone will know we should do the right thing and the world will be perfect," she joked. "Maybe I've just lived a little long, but I have no illusions about how hard this is going to be."

Rhode Island's primary on March 4 can only net Clinton 21 delegates. On the same day, races in delegate-rich Texas and Ohio could prove decisive for her candidacy as she struggles to regain footing after losing 11 straight primaries and caucuses to Obama.

In the delegate race, Clinton trails with 1,024 to Obama's 1,178, with roughly a third of the total still to be awarded, according to The Associated Press.

Excerpts

Hillary Clinton told The New York Times recently, ‘I want to get back to the appropriate balance of power between government and the market... You try to find common ground, insofar as possible. But if you really believe you have to manage the economy, you have to stake a lot of your presidency on it.’ Notice that she equates government power and market power. That is absurd. ‘Power’ in a free market means success at creating goods and services that your fellow human beings voluntarily choose to buy. Government power is force: the ability to fine and imprison people. Politicians who talk about managing the economy ignore the fact that, strictly speaking, there is no economy. There are only people producing, buying and selling goods and services. Keep that in mind, and one realizes that government action more often than not interferes with the productive activities that benefit everyone... The economy is far too complex for any president—no matter how smart—to manage. How can politicians and bureaucrats possibly know what hundreds of millions of individuals know, want and aspire to? How can government employees fathom what trade-offs to make in a world of scarce resources? They can’t. That’s why free people are more prosperous than unfree people. Presidential candidates should promise to keep their hands off the economy.” —John Stossel
 

“But as he moves into the lead for the Democratic nomination, however much we may delight in seeing the air deflate from the Clinton dirigible, we must ask: What would a President [Barack] Obama look like? Much of his rhetoric is lighter than air—almost content free. It’s the past versus the future, hope over fear, one nation not two, yes we can, turn the page, and so forth. But when you get past the music and really focus on the lyrics, Obama emerges as an utterly conventional, down-the-line liberal Democrat. He claims to be all about the future, but his policy ideas are about as modern as disco and the leisure suit.” —Mona Charen

“The goal of the ‘liberals’ —as it emerges from the record of the past decades—was to smuggle this country into welfare statism by means of single, concrete, specific measures, enlarging the power of the government a step at a time, never permitting these steps to be summed up into principles, never permitting their direction to be identified or the basic issue to be named. Thus, statism was to come, not by vote or by violence, but by slow rot—by a long process of evasion and epistemological corruption, leading to a fait accompli.” —Ayn Rand

“Leadership is a great burden. We grow weary of it at times... But if we are not to shoulder the burdens of leadership in the free world, then who will?... We grew from that small, weak republic which had as its assets spirit, optimism, faith in God and an unshakeable belief that free men and women could govern themselves wisely. We became the leader of the free world, an example for all those who cherish freedom. If we are to continue to be that example—if we are to preserve our own freedom—we must understand those who would dominate us and deal with them with determination. We must shoulder our burden with our eyes fixed on the future, but recognizing the realities of today, not counting on mere hope or wishes. We must be willing to carry out our responsibility as the custodian of individual freedom. Then we will achieve our destiny to be as a shining city on a hill for all mankind to see.” —Ronald Reagan

“[I]t seems to me that Barack Obama is the triumph of flesh, color, and despair over word—that’s to say, he offers an appealing embodiment of identity politics plus a ludicrously despairing vision of contemporary America... On the other hand, if you’re running for president not as an unexceptional first-term senator with a thin resume but as the new Messiah, the new Kennedy, the new Gandhi, the new Martin Luther King, you can’t blame folks for leaping ahead to the next stage in the mythic narrative. Around the world, a second instant sub-genre has sprung up in which commentators speculate how long it will be before some deranged Christian-fundamentalist neo-Nazi gun-nut deprives America of its fleeting wisp of glory.” —Mark Steyn

 
 

Saturday, February 23, 2008

Global Warming? New Data Shows Ice Is Back

Are the world's ice caps melting because of climate change, or are the reports just a lot of scare mongering by the advocates of the global warming theory?

Scare mongering appears to be the case, according to reports from the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) that reveal that almost all the allegedly “lost” ice has come back. A NOAA report shows that ice levels which had shrunk from 5 million square miles in January 2007 to just 1.5 million square miles in October, are almost back to their original levels.

Moreover, a Feb. 18 report in the London Daily Express showed that there is nearly a third more ice in Antarctica than usual, challenging the global warming crusaders and buttressing arguments of skeptics who deny that the world is undergoing global warming.

The Daily express recalls the photograph of polar bears clinging on to a melting iceberg which has been widely hailed as proof of the need to fight climate change and has been used by former Vice President Al Gore during his "Inconvenient Truth" lectures about mankind’s alleged impact on the global climate.

Gore fails to mention that the photograph was taken in the month of August when melting is normal. Or that the polar bear population has soared in recent years.

As winter roars in across the Northern Hemisphere, Mother Nature seems to have joined the ranks of the skeptics.

As the Express notes, scientists are saying the northern Hemisphere has endured its coldest winter in decades, adding that snow cover across the area is at its greatest since 1966. The newspaper cites the one exception — Western Europe, which had, until the weekend when temperatures plunged to as low as -10 C in some places, been basking in unseasonably warm weather.

Around the world, vast areas have been buried under some of the heaviest snowfalls in decades. Central and southern China, the United States, and Canada were hit hard by snowstorms. In China, snowfall was so heavy that over 100,000 houses collapsed under the weight of snow.

Jerusalem, Damascus, Amman, and northern Saudi Arabia report the heaviest falls in years and below-zero temperatures. In Afghanistan, snow and freezing weather killed 120 people. Even Baghdad had a snowstorm, the first in the memory of most residents.

AFP news reports icy temperatures have just swept through south China, stranding 180,000 people and leading to widespread power cuts just as the area was recovering from the worst weather in 50 years, the government said Monday. The latest cold snap has taken a severe toll in usually temperate Yunnan province, which has been struck by heavy snowfalls since Thursday, a government official from the provincial disaster relief office told AFP.

Twelve people have died there, state Xinhua news agency reported, and four remained missing as of Saturday.

An ongoing record-long spell of cold weather in Vietnam's northern region, which started on Jan. 14, has killed nearly 60,000 cattle, mainly bull and buffalo calves, local press reported Monday. By Feb. 17, the spell had killed a total of 59,962 cattle in the region, including 7,349 in the Ha Giang province, 6,400 in Lao Cai, and 5,571 in Bac Can province, said Hoang Kim Giao, director of the Animal Husbandry Department under the Vietnamese Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, according to the Pioneer newspaper.

In Britain the temperatures plunged to -10 C in central England, according to the Express, which reports that experts say that February could end up as one of the coldest in Britain in the past 10 years with the freezing night-time conditions expected to stay around a frigid -8 C until at least the middle of the week. And the BBC reports that a bus company's efforts to cut global warming emissions have led to services being disrupted by cold weather.

Meanwhile Athens News reports that a raging snow storm that blanketed most of Greece over the weekend and continued into the early morning hours on Monday, plunging the country into sub-zero temperatures. The agency reported that public transport buses were at a standstill on Monday in the wider Athens area, while ships remained in ports, public services remained closed, and schools and courthouses in the more severely-stricken prefectures were also closed.

Scores of villages, mainly on the island of Crete, and in the prefectures of Evia, Argolida, Arcadia, Lakonia, Viotia, and the Cyclades islands were snowed in.

More than 100 villages were snowed-in on the island of Crete and temperatures in Athens dropped to -6 C before dawn, while the coldest temperatures were recorded in Kozani, Grevena, Kastoria and Florina, where they plunged to -12 C.

If global warming gets any worse we'll all freeze to death.

Friday, February 22, 2008

The Moon in Eclipse


The above photo is pretty much what Celeste, Bob and myself saw the other night through my telescope from the front yard. Absolutely breathtaking sight! We finished off the evening with a quick observation of Saturn and one or two of it's satellites.
Thanks for joining us Bobby!

NYT Ignorance

Is it just me, or has the New York Times become one of the most gossipy papers in the nation, with a discrete lack of fact-checking and source verification?
 
A Rip-Off by Health Insurers?
Published: February 18, 2008

Have health insurers been systematically cheating patients and doctors of fair reimbursement for medical services? That is the disturbing possibility raised by an investigation of the industry’s arcane procedures for calculating “reasonable and customary” rates.

The investigation, by the New York State attorney general, Andrew Cuomo, and his staff, suggests that these procedures — used by major insurance companies to determine what they will pay when patients visit a doctor who is not in the company’s network — may be rigged to shortchange the beneficiaries.

When patients visit an out-of-network doctor, insurers typically agree to pay 80 percent of the reasonable and customary rate charged by doctors in the same geographic area. The patient is stuck with the rest, and as any patient knows, that rate always seems to fall short of what their own doctor is charging. If the attorney general’s investigators are right, we can understand why.

The numbers are mainly compiled by an obscure [Ed:?] company known as Ingenix, which — as it turns out — is owned by UnitedHealth Group, one of the nation’s largest health insurers. Ingenix collects billing information from UnitedHealth and other health care payers to compile a database that is then used by the insurers to determine out-of-network reimbursement rates.

This system is an invitation for abuse. UnitedHealth owns the company whose database will affect its costs and profitability, so both have a strong financial interest in keeping reimbursement rates low. Even Ingenix seems unwilling to stand behind its numbers. In licensing its database to insurers, it stresses that the data is “for informational purposes only” and does not imply anything about “reasonable and customary” charges. Yet that is precisely what the health insurers use the data for, as Ingenix knows, according to investigators.

Mr. Cuomo and the American Medical Association, which has a long-standing suit filed against Ingenix and various UnitedHealth companies, claim that the data is manipulated. They claim that health insurers and Ingenix disproportionately eliminate high charges, thus skewing the numbers for customary charges downward.

Mr. Cuomo also says that Ingenix pools the charges for services performed by low-paid nurses and physician assistants with those performed by high-paid doctors. And he says the company fails to account for the patient’s condition and type of facility where the service was provided — factors that can drive up costs. He also contends that Ingenix uses outdated information, which would guarantee that reimbursement rates will always lag behind medical inflation.

The A.M.A.’s more detailed legal complaint also charges that the database dilutes prices in high-cost locations by combining them with low-cost areas, and includes prices that reflect in-network discounts.

The attorney general’s investigators did their own survey and concluded that $200 is the fair market rate in New York City and Nassau County for a 15-minute consultation with a doctor for an illness of low to moderate severity. Ingenix, the investigators said, calculated the rate as $77, of which United would pay $62, leaving the patient to pay $138. UnitedHealth disputes those numbers, so the attorney general will need to offer a fuller explanation of how they were derived.

Mr. Cuomo has announced his intention to sue UnitedHealth, Ingenix and three other subsidiaries, and has subpoenaed data from 16 other health insurers. Whatever that investigation unearths, it is already clear that the system for calculating “reasonable and customary” charges ought to be reformed by making it truly independent and objective. No consumer can reasonably trust numbers generated by a company whose loyalties and financial interests lie with the health insurers.

 

And here is the response from the President of INgenix, the company I work for.
 
Health Insurance Data?

To the Editor:

Re “A Rip-Off by Health Insurers?” (editorial, Feb. 18):

Ingenix compiles actual physician-billed charge data — more than 1.3 billion continuously updated records collected from 100 major contributors in 50 states — and licenses summaries of that information to health plans so they can use it to make better decisions. We believe that all markets, health care in particular, need more, not less, information so that quality and cost can be better understood and improved.

We do not know the source of the $77 figure your editorial cites from the New York attorney general as Ingenix’s calculation of the “fair market rate in New York City and Nassau County for a 15-minute consultation with a doctor for an illness of low to moderate severity.”

Instead, a health plan reimbursing this consultation using our Prevailing Healthcare Charges System data at the 80th percentile would price this service at $160.

We stand behind the quality of this and other P.H.C.S. data. P.H.C.S. data serve as a valid, unbiased and useful basis for health plans to use in making their reimbursement decisions. Without this accurate market information, health plans cannot know with any confidence if the amount charged for a service is higher than, lower than or approximately consistent with what is generally charged for that service in that area.

There is absolutely no systematic bias that eliminates high charges in the data. We do not manipulate data so that our health plan clients can justify lower payment rates.

We believe that our data and methodologies are the best available to the industry. Moreover, we believe that the alternatives to the benchmark market data we offer are not in the best interest of the health care system. Health plans that offer out-of-network benefits would need to make reimbursement decisions based on government-set pricing similar to Medicare or in the absence of any statistical data at all.

We look forward to an open and balanced dialogue about the very real need to provide more accessible information to all stakeholders in the health care industry.

Andy Slavitt
Chief Executive, Ingenix
Eden Prairie, Minn., Feb. 19, 2008

Classic Democrat Spin

All you democrats out there should be real proud of your two communist candidates. I ask you: Which side are they really on? Are they for or against us U.S.? ONe has to ask that question from Mr. B. Hussein Obama....
 
OBAMA: But it also means using our military wisely. And on what I believe was the single most important foreign policy decision of this generation, whether or not to go to war in Iraq, I believe I showed the judgment of a commander in chief. And I think that Senator Clinton was wrong in her judgments on that.
 
(APPLAUSE)
 
Now, that has consequences -- that has significant consequences, because it has diverted attention from Afghanistan where al Qaeda, that killed 3,000 Americans, are stronger now than at any time since 2001 [Ed: Yes - another result of the democratic congress keeping the military in check with political partisanship].
 
You know, I've heard from an Army captain [Ed: Who?] who was the head of a rifle platoon -- supposed to have 39 men in a rifle platoon. Ended up being sent to Afghanistan with 24 because 15 of those soldiers had been sent to Iraq.
 
[This HAS to be challenged, but the darlings in MSM will not. If Romney said it, they'd be all over him]
 
OBAMA: And as a consequence, they didn't have enough ammunition [Ed: What evidence do you have?], they didn't have enough humvees. They were actually capturing Taliban weapons, because it was easier to get Taliban weapons than it was for them to get properly equipped by our current commander in chief.
 
[Fact: Soldiers have to account for all ammo. Using a captured weapon to defend oneself is a direct result of a democratic congress putting the squeeze on the military politically.]
 
Facts are stubborn things. Obama should - along with ALL democrats - be embarrassed.

Thursday, February 21, 2008

Haditha Marines

Haditha Marines Still
Need Your Help
Urgent Letter From Christopher Ruddy
Publisher, Newsmax.com


Dear Reader:


Two Marines need your help . . . again.

Last year, I wrote to you about the plight of three American heroes, Lance Cpl. Stephen Tatum, Lance Cpl. Justin Sharratt, and Staff Sgt. Frank Wuterich.

The three were under investigation for allegations that they committed atrocities in Haditha, Iraq, in November 2005.

When I first wrote to you about these courageous men, they were under Article 32 investigation — the military equivalent of a grand jury hearing.

The hysteria against these Marines was set off by a Time magazine reporter whose only sources were known insurgent propagandists, civilian supporters of al-Qaida, or civilians intimidated by al-Qaida thugs.

On the basis of the Time story alone, and despite the fact that Time was forced to retract parts of the initial story four times, the media across the world reported that the Kilo Company Marines had gone on a rampage.

The Time report claimed Marines had massacred 24 innocent civilians on Nov. 19, 2005, in retaliation for the death of one of their fellow Marines. The Marine was killed by a roadside bomb.

In response to the media charges and those echoed by Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa., and a badly bungled investigation by the Naval Criminal Investigation Service (NCIS), the three heroes were falsely charged with multiple counts of murder.

When we alerted you to this grave injustice, Newsmax readers rose to the occasion. You donated more than $250,000 for the legal defense funds of these Marines.

And your help made a big difference.

At the end of the Article 32 hearings, the presiding military officer recommended strongly that all charges be dropped against the three Marines.

Sharratt was fully exonerated.

But suddenly the Pentagon ignored the findings of the military tribunal relating to Tatum and Wuterich and recommended that these Marines should face courts-martial.

Both are scheduled to go to court in March, with long jail sentences looming.

As you can imagine, the legal defense costs for these Marines have placed an enormous burden on them and their families, and have well exceeded even the $250,000 our readers have donated to their cause.

We have been informed that these Marines are in desperate need of financial resources to continue their legal struggle.

You can help these Marines — Go Here Now.

In a letter to Newsmax, John and Stephanie Tatum, the parents of Lance Cpl. Tatum, expressed their extreme frustration: The government “put on its best case including hearsay written statements from Iraqi civilians and others. The investigating officer Lt. Col. Paul Ware (a tough combat veteran and a felony level military judge) who reviewed all of the evidence against Stephen at the article 32 hearing recommended that all charges be DROPPED! He stated that the key government witnesses’ testimony was not credible.”

In the report on the Wuterich case, Ware wrote: "The evidence is contradictory, the forensic analysis is limited and almost all the witnesses have an obvious bias or prejudice."

Gen. James Mattis, the Marines’ commanding general, agreed and dismissed all seven original allegations, including murder charges.

But the Pentagon is continuing to press charges, including manslaughter. As a result, both families face costly trials and the very real possibility their sons will be railroaded on the flimsiest of evidence.

"It is very disheartening and frustrating," Mrs. Tatum writes. "Stephen has not dishonored his country or the Marine uniform that he wears with great pride, dedication, and respect . . . We don’t have enough money in our retirement account and equity in our home to come close to covering all these new trial expenses."

Truthfully, these Marine families should not have to pay for political show trials.

But the lengths to which the Pentagon is going to prosecute these Marines is shocking.

You can help these Marines — Go Here Now.

Military prosecutors even sought to keep Wuterich’s attorneys from calling a key exonerating witness, Maj. Jeffrey Dinsmore.

One of the reasons the Article 32 hearings had cleared the Marines was the very compelling testimony of Dinsmore, an intelligence officer who had carefully monitored the engagement in Haditha.

Dinsmore kept a narrative complete with photos from an unmanned aerial vehicle, transcripts of radio transmissions from the scene of action, and reports from some of the participants all the way up the command ladder.

Dinsmore's reports proved conclusively that the actions of the Marines were proper and justified in clearing out areas with terrorists.

Nevertheless, a Pentagon prosecutor filed a motion to prevent Dinsmore from testifying. Fortunately, a military judge denied this motion, but the Pentagon's attempt shows how awful the treatment of these Marines has been.

Back to Haditha

We at Newsmax have reported the truth about this case for nearly two years with comprehensive coverage from our correspondent Phil Brennan. We believe a grave injustice has been committed against these hero Marines.

Here is some background on these courageous young men, Lance Cpl. Stephen Tatum and Staff Sgt. Frank Wuterich.

In his first tour of duty in Iraq, Tatum fought fearlessly in the second battle of Fallujah, a small city in al Anbar province north of Baghdad in what is known as the Sunni Triangle.

This battle, in November 2004, was one of the fiercest and bloodiest engagements in the long and proud history of the Marine Corps, and it earned Tatum the admiration and respect of his fellow Marines in the 3rd battalion, 1st Marine Regiment — the storied "Thundering Third."

Tatum was at the infamous "Hell House" fight at Fallujah immortalized in Nat Helms’ book "My Men Are My Heroes: The Brad Kasal Story." In this vicious battle, wounded Marines fended off a fierce guerilla attack for almost 24 hours.

In the days before and after that bloody incident, Tatum fought in the terrifying street-by-street, house-by-house fight to cleanse Fallujah of the al-Qaida thugs terrorizing the city.

In his second tour of duty, this time in insurgent-controlled Haditha, Tatum's unit faced an enemy lurking in the shadows among the civilian population, on the lookout for a chance to ambush Marines or kill them with hidden IEDs (roadside bombs) or sniper fire.

On Nov. 19, 2005, an IED exploded under a Humvee, killing driver Lance Cpl. Miguel Terrazas and wounding two other members of Kilo Company, 3rd Battalion 1st Marines, Lance Cpls. James Crossan and Salvador Guzman.

The surviving Marines then came under fire from two houses near the site of the explosion.

Almost immediately, a white sedan came on the scene and Sgt. Frank Wuterich, mindful of an intelligence briefing that had warned of an impending ambush involving a white car, killed the occupants as they came out of the vehicle and refused to stop when ordered to do so.

A rapid response team arrived on the scene 15 minutes after the IED explosion and the officer in command ordered Wuterich and his men to clear the two houses.

In the course of what became a fierce door-to-door, full-day battle, 24 Iraqis were killed. At least eight insurgent terrorists were believed to be among them. But some civilians were clearly killed in the crossfire.

Despite the loss of civilian life, the military was satisfied that the Marines had acted properly because of Dinsmore's meticulous work in chronicling the engagement with video and radio reports.

Dinsmore's reports proved conclusively that the actions of the Marines were proper and justified.

Months later, in March of the next year, wild allegations began to surface that these Marines knowingly massacred innocent Iraqi civilians. Time magazine followed with its report.

Since then, these Marine heroes and their parents have been living a life of total hell.

You can help these Marines — Go Here Now.

Of course, the legal defense costs for these Marines have placed an enormous burden on them and their families.

One defense lawyer estimated that by the time the courts-martial are over, the Marines — defenders of freedom, who have limited incomes and resources — will have incurred legal expenses amounting to $500,000 each.

That's why we are asking our readers to help these brave young Marines with their legal defense costs. You can do so by Going Here Now.

We will be forever indebted to the heroic young men and women who serve to protect us in Iraq. They do not deserve to be tortured with criminal allegations and overwhelming financial burdens.

Heroic Americans

Let me tell you about these young men whose extraordinary heroism and exceptional service to their country have been rewarded with totally unjustified charges of murder.

Lance Cpl. Tatum hails from Oklahoma City, Okla. He graduated from the Putnam City public schools, playing sports in grade school followed by football in high school.

His parents say Stephen has always had a positive attitude, and was well liked by his teachers and friends.

Stephen, they told Newsmax, is a religious young man who enjoys going to church with family and friends. He always wanted to be a Marine and has served his country with great pride, honor, and dedication.

Staff Sgt. Wuterich was an honor student in Meriden, Conn., an active sportsman who played the trumpet in the school band, and performed with the drama club.

While still in his senior year of high school, Frank enlisted in the United States Marine Corps.

For the past eight years, he has been an outstanding leader with many decorations and commendations.

Ironically, before being charged with murder, he had been recommended for the Bronze Star for the very actions at Haditha that resulted in the charges.

Frank is married to Marisol, a nursing student. They have three children.

They Need Your Help

These courageous Marines need your help and they need it now. They've earned it and deserve it.

You can show your support for these great Americans by Going Here Now.

We are so strongly behind these Marines that Newsmax has made $15,000 in donations to help their legal defense funds.

To make a donation, send your gift to the Haditha Heroes Fund at Newsmax or Go Here Now, and we will divide your donations between these two funds equally.

Newsmax will send all donations — every penny — to the aid of the Marines. Newsmax will even pay all the credit card processing costs that will incur.

Help us show America's appreciation for these fine young Marines and their selfless service to our country — Go Here Now.

Thank you.

Sincerely,


Christopher Ruddy
Publisher, Newsmax.com

On A Lighter Note

Subject: Moses

How Moses allegedly got the 10 commandments

God went to the Arabs and said,
"I have Commandments for you that will make your lives better."

The Arabs asked, "What are Commandments?"

The Lord answered, "They are rules for living."

"Can you give us an example?"

"Thou shall not kill."
"Not kill? We're not interested."

Next, he went to the Blacks and said, "I have Commandments."
The Blacks wanted an example, and the Lord said,

"Honor thy Father and Mother."
"Father, we don't know who our fathers are. We're not interested."

Then He went to the Mexicans and said, "I have Commandments."
The Mexicans also wanted an example, and the Lord said

"Thou shall not steal."
"Not steal? We're not interested."

Then He went to the French and said, "I have Commandments."
The French too wanted an example and the Lord said,

"Thou shall not commit adultery."
"Not commit adultery? We're not interested."

Finally, He went to the Jews and said, "I have Commandments."
"Commandments?" They said, "How much are they?"

"They're free."

"We'll take 10."

There, that should piss off just about everybody

Character Ass-ass-ination Attempt

Well, you knew the Clinton Machine would begin rolling as soon as she felt the hot breath of DEFEAT against her neck....
 
The Leftist/Commy rag known as the New York Times (or, as I like to call it, the American Social Worker's Toilet Paper), published a report today that McCain was in a so-called 'relationship' with a female lobbyist back in 2000.
 
Naturally, consistent with the NYT's famous coverage, no real names are cited:
 
The newspaper quoted anonymous aides as saying they had urged McCain and Iseman to stay away from each other prior to his failed presidential campaign in 2000.
 
Oooh! Now that's big news.
 
It must feel really lousy if you are a democrat or a McCain supporter (uh, the same?) to know that your vote means nothing in the end and that the Mainstream Media has declared themselves competent to decide which candidates are going to run in November. Take note of the differing attitudes of MSM towards Hillary and Obama. Obama, according to the NYT, was 'dead in the water' a month ago. Hillary, now, is a 'train that just keeps on rolling'. Now that Obama has taken TEN straight primaries, the shitty NYT is using phrases like 'Hillary is on a meteoric comeback..'...
 
Wow, Democrats really got fooled on this one. Glad my guy is out. Let the Democrats do what they do best - lose wars, increase taxes, bloviate government, and then blame the republicans.
 
Mitt 2012!
 
 

'Supporting the Troops'

By Thomas Sowell
February 19, 2008

The Berkeley city council has made national news by telling Marine Corps recruiters that they are unwelcome in that bastion of the academic left.

It is a shame that Berkeley is not on some island in the South Pacific, because then they could be given their independence and left to defend themselves.

As it is, members of our armed forces who put their lives on the line to defend America are also defending people like too many in Berkeley for whom the very word America, and the American flag, bring only sneers.

Unfortunately, Berkeley is not unique. A professor at Harvard who put an American flag on his car after 9-11 provoked looks of astonishment from his colleagues. They wondered what was wrong with him.

All across the country, there are professors who push for keeping military recruiters off campus and for banning ROTC. Apparently if they don't like the military, then other people -- such as students -- should not be allowed to make up their own minds whether they want to join or not.

Liberals in general, and academics in particular, like to boast of their open-mindedness and acceptance of non-conformity. But they mean not conforming to the norms of society at large.

They have little or no tolerance to those who do not conform to the norms of academic political correctness. Nowhere else in America is free speech so restricted as on academic campuses with speech codes.

In Berkeley, as elsewhere, the left has learned to cloak their anti-military intolerance with the magic words, "We support the troops." The liberal media use the same line when they undermine the military.

In this, as in other things, the flagship of the media is the New York Times. Unsubstantiated charges against American troops in Iraq are front page news but incredible acts of heroism in battle are seldom reported there, if at all.

Although things go wrong in every war, things that went wrong in Iraq -- whether large or small -- have been front page news in the New York Times. But when the military surge was followed by things going right, the Iraq war was suddenly no longer front page news.

Back during the Vietnam war, the media criticized the American military for their emphasis on enemy casualties or "body count." Today the media have been fixated on American body count.

What has been accomplished by the troops who lost their lives in battle has been of no interest to those who claim to be "supporting the troops."

That thousands of Iraqis who fled the country during the height of the violence and turmoil are now returning is no big deal to the media.

Those in the military who made this possible by putting their own lives on the line are not heroes to the media. Indeed, one of the consistent patterns in the liberal media has been to depict the troops not as heroes but as victims.

The financial problems of some reservists who were called away from their civilian jobs were front page news in the New York Times. So were sorrowful goodbyes from family and friends.

All these things made the troops victims. So does body count.

Just last month, the New York Times found yet another way to portray the troops as victims. They ran a very long article, beginning on the front page of the January 13th issue, about killings in the United States by combat veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan.

"In many of those cases," it said, "combat trauma and the stress of deployment" were among the factors which "appear to have set the stage for a tragedy that was part destruction, part self-destruction."

As with so many other things said by liberals, the big question that was not asked was: Compared to what?

As the New York Post reported a couple of days later, the murder rate among returning military combat veterans is one-fifth that of civilians in the same age brackets.

So much for "supporting the troops" by depicting them as victims.

Wisdom

"Society in every state is a blessing, but government, even in
its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an
intolerable one; for when we suffer or are exposed to the same
miseries by a government, which we might expect in a country
without government, our calamity is heightened by reflecting that
we furnish the means by which we suffer."

-- Thomas Paine (Common Sense, 1776)

Wednesday, February 20, 2008

On the Lighter side...

"If you think you are beaten, you are,
If you think you dare not, you don't.
If you like to win, but you think you can't,
It is almost certain you won't."
"If you think you'll lose, you're lost,
For out of the world we find,
Success begins with a fellow's will--
It's all in the state of mind."
"If you think you are outclassed, you are,
You've got to think high to rise,
You've got to be sure of yourself before
You can ever win a prize."

"Life's battles don't always go
To the stronger or faster man,
But soon or late the man who wins
Is the man WHO THINKS HE CAN!"

PBS prospective on Haditha

Once again, PBS, public broadcasting system, aka channel 2 and 44 Boston produced Frontline. ULTRA LIBERAL FASICTS doing anything to get the public to believe their propaganda. Herr Gobels would be very proud of them in their NAZI's zeal to repeat every lie to get the lemmings to believe it's true...
And the scary part is that people believe it to be gospel, even though pbs is a secular entity...

Mind you a Marine Staff Sergeant's life is on the line here. pbs is trying to convict the Marines in the court of public opinion...


'Frontline' Haditha Story Short on Facts

Wednesday, February 20, 2008 9:20 AM

By: Phil Brennan

Tuesday night’s “Frontline” story on PBS, “Rules of Engagement,” omitted key facts that help exonerate the Marines accused of killing innocent Iraqi civilians in Haditha on Nov. 19, 2005.

”Frontline” accepted without question the legitimacy of the so-called Hammurabi Human Rights Association and allowed its alleged head man Abdul-Rahman al-Mashhadani to tell the story of the aftermath of Nov. 19, even though the organization consists solely of himself and one Thaer Thabit al-Hadithi — the original source of the video excerpts “Frontline” showed.

Both men are known insurgent propagandists whose communications were closely monitored by Marine intelligence officers. It was from those intercepts that the Marines were able to predict the Nov. 19 insurgent ambush in Haditha.

Moreover, “Frontline” neglected to inform viewers that the same Abdul-Rahman al-Mashhadani had just been released from almost six months captivity for insurgent activities. And al-Hadithi was considered a useful intelligence tool by Marines listening to him talk on his cell phone, as “My Men Are Heroes” author Nat Helms has also reported on the Defend Our Marines Web site.

# “Frontline” portrayed Haditha as peaceful and free of insurgents prior to the arrival of the Marines, while Newsmax and other media had reported the city to be firmly under insurgent control.

On June 6, 2006, Maj. Jeffrey Dinsmore, an intelligence officer who carefully monitored the engagement in Haditha, provided an entirely different picture of the Haditha the Marines found when they arrived there. Dinsmore reported to Newsmax, “We were the first force into Haditha since [an article about insurgency in Haditha was published], and we were very aware of the insurgent control. A little tidbit of info: Did you know that when we went into the city, the insurgents had freshly paved over dirt roads leading into the town under the auspices of civic work projects and public improvement? They were beautiful asphalt-surfaced roads, with painted lines and everything.

“The only problem was that they had laid more than 100 mega-IEDs under that asphalt, and in order to avoid having to change batteries in the initiating devices, they wired them into city power via the power lines adjacent to the road. This is also the road where the engagement in question took place.”

# “Frontline” repeatedly showed the erroneous report issued by the Marine public information officer alleging that the 15 civilian dead were killed by the IED blast set off by the insurgents, which killed one Marine and injured two others.

On June 12, 2006, Dinsmore — then still a captain — stated what really happened.

“Here is what the commander [Lt. Col. Jeffrey Chessani] told his boss, and what the battalion officially filed as a report that evening [after fighting all day]: ‘A total of 24 KIA were assessed . . . 15 civilians were assessed to be killed by the IED blast and ensuing fire . . . eight KIA were assessed to be enemy. The follow-on small arms fire between insurgents and coalition forces contributed to the civilian deaths.’

“I paraphrased slightly, but the last sentence is almost verbatim. One of NCIS' [Naval Criminal Investigation Service's] confrontational positions is that the last sentence, although it was fairly clear, was too brief and did not accurately reflect the magnitude of the civilian deaths. That is the basis of their accusation that the battalion was deceptive in its reporting.

“Also, the battalion had a specific methodology for determining the insurgents from the civilians. This was very clear from the outset, but one of the accusations is that we came up with the number out of thin air.

“How did this translate into the press release that all civilians were killed by the IED blast? Answer: The Division public affairs officer. He was totally removed from the situation, and either left out the last sentence on purpose, or just overlooked it.

“We at the battalion were dumbfounded that he left out that crucial piece of information when we read the final press release, but it was too late at that point. We were not surprised at all that the press release raised questions. We chalked it up to the clueless folks at division HQ, not deception.”

There were other serious flaws in “Rules of Engagement,” and Newsmax will examine them later, but the above should show how “Frontline” distorted the real picture by omitting crucial facts.

Michelle Obama's America -- And Mine

By Michelle Malkin
February 20, 2008

Like Michelle Obama, I am a "woman of color." Like Michelle Obama, I am a working mother of two young children. Like Michelle Obama, I am a member of the 13th generation of Americans born since the founding of our great nation.

Unlike Michelle Obama, I can't keep track of the number of times I've been proud -- really proud -- of my country since I was born and privileged to live in it.

At a speech in Milwaukee this week on behalf of her husband's Democratic presidential campaign, Mrs. Obama remarked, "For the first time in my adult lifetime, I am really proud of my country, and not just because Barack has done well, but because I think people are hungry for change."

Mrs. Obama's statement was met with warm applause from other Barack supporters who have apparently also been devoid of pride in their country for their adult lifetimes. Or maybe it was just a Pavlovian response to the word "change." What a sad, empty, narcissistic, ungrateful, unthinking lot.

I'm just seven years younger than Mrs. Obama. We've grown up and lived in the same era. And yet, her self-absorbed attitude is completely foreign to me. What planet is she living on? Since when was now the only time the American people have ever been "hungry for change"? Michelle, ma belle, Barack is not the center of the universe. Newsflash: The Obamas did not invent "change" any more than Hillary invented "leadership" or John McCain invented "straight talk."

We were both adults when the Berlin Wall fell, Michelle. That was earth-shattering change.

We've lived through two decades' worth of peaceful, if contentious election cycles under the rule of law, which have brought about "change" and upheaval, both good and bad.

We were adults through several launches of the space shuttle, in case you were snoozing. And as adults, we've witnessed and benefited from dizzyingly rapid advances in technology, communications, science and medicine pioneered by American entrepreneurs who yearned to change the world and succeeded. You want "change"? Go ask the patients whose lives have been improved and extended by American pharmaceutical companies that have flourished under the best economic system in the world.

If American ingenuity, a robust constitutional republic and the fall of communism don't do it for you, hon, then how about American heroism and sacrifice?

How about every Memorial Day? Every Veterans Day? Every Independence Day? Every Medal of Honor ceremony? Has she never attended a welcome home ceremony for the troops?

For me, there's the thrill of the Blue Angels roaring over cloudless skies. And the somber awe felt amid the hallowed waters that surround the sunken U.S.S. Arizona at the Pearl Harbor memorial.

Every naturalization ceremony I've attended, where hundreds of new Americans raised their hands to swear an oath of allegiance to this land of liberty, has been a moment of pride for me. So have the awesome displays of American compassion at home and around the world. When millions of Americans rallied to help victims of the 2004 tsunami in Southeast Asia -- including members of the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln Carrier Strike Group that sped from Hong Kong to assist survivors -- my heart filled with pride. It did again when the citizens of Houston opened their arms to Hurricane Katrina victims and folks across the country rushed to their churches, and Salvation Army and Red Cross offices to volunteer.

How about American resilience? Does that not make you proud? Only a heart of stone could be unmoved by the strength, valor and determination displayed in New York, Washington, D.C., and Shanksville, Pa., on September 11, 2001.

I believe it was Michael Kinsley who quipped that a gaffe is when a politician tells the truth. In this case, it's what happens when an elite Democratic politician's wife says what a significant portion of the party's base really believes to be the truth: America is more a source of shame than pride.

Michelle Obama has achieved enormous professional success, political influence and personal acclaim in America. Ivy League-educated, she's been lauded by Essence magazine as one of the 25 World's Most Inspiring Women; by Vanity Fair as one of the 10 World's Best-Dressed Women; and named one of "The Harvard 100" most influential alumni. She has had an amazingly blessed life. But you wouldn't know it from her campaign rhetoric and her griping about her and her husband's student loans.

For years, we've heard liberals get offended at any challenge to their patriotism. And so they are again aggrieved and rising to explain away Mrs. Obama's remarks.

Like Lady Macbeth, Lady Michelle and her defenders protest too much

Uh...

Then pipe down already: “Speeches don’t put food on the table. Speeches don’t fill up your tank, or fill your prescription, or do anything about that stack of bills that keeps you up at night. Some people may think words are change. You and I know better. Words are cheap.” —Hillary Clinton **One can only hope she’ll take her own advice and stop talking. And how is that stack of bills going to get smaller if you are going to remove the Bush Tax Cuts and increase government largess?
 
Yeah, right: “I’ve gone hunting. I know you may not believe it, but it’s true. My father taught us to shoot.” —Hillary Clinton, who has also always been a Yankees fan. Or is that a Mets Fan?
 
“All of that soaring rhetoric is supported by policies that are so old they creak. Obama may be shiny, bright, and new, but his ideas are suffering from senility.” —Mona Charen
“[Hillary’s] whole life right now is a reverse Sally Field. She’s looking out at an audience of colleagues and saying, ‘You don’t like me, you really don’t like me!”’ —Peggy Noonan
 
“The problems facing America—unsustainable entitlements, broken borders, nuclearizing enemies—require tough solutions, not gaseous Sesame Street platitudes.” —Mark Steyn
 
“Hillary Clinton stated there will be no personal scandal caused by her husband if she’s elected president. There goes the last of her support. First she lost the black vote, then she lost the youth vote, and now she has lost the comedians.” —Argus Hamilton
“Over the weekend in Ohio, former President Bill Clinton had an angry confrontation with a heckler who claimed at one point Bill Clinton made physical contact. Clinton denied any physical contact, but then again, he always does.” —Conan O’Brien
 
 

Scary AND True

I'm guessing you did not know this:
 
In 1948, Henry Wallace left the Democratic Party to form the Communist-dominated, Soviet-backed "Progressive Party". In 1999, the Clinton Administration dedicated a room at the Agriculture Department to Wallace. George McGovern openly praised Wallace. McGovern recalled fondly that he himself had voted for Wallace and had run for president in 1972 "on a similar platform" -- with the help of a young Yale Law student graduate named Bill Clinton.
 
The fact is, the Clintons - Bill AND Hillary - are Good Communists, but terrible Americans.
 
Given the 10-in-a-row by Obama, it is beginning to look like it's down to Obama vs. McCain.

Astronomy: Total Lunar Eclipse Tonight

Skies permitting, you will be able to observe a total eclipse tonight.

Penumbral Eclipse begins at 7:37 pm.
Partial Eclipse begins at 8:43 pm.
Total Eclipse begins at 10:01 pm.

Excellent Graphic here for those of you who skipped astronomy in high school or were out smoking blunts (Christa? Dave?).

Weather: Clear Sky Clock

Explanation of what an exclipse is here.
.

Tuesday, February 19, 2008

Creative Advertising - The Mobile Edition




Creative Advertising IV - VII

So what exactly are they advertising?
Same question
Okay.... got this one
Awww :)


If you...

"If you would plant for days, plant flowers.
If you would plant for years, plant trees.
If you would plant for eternity, plant ideas!"
 

Happy birthday

happy birthday Bob

hope you have a great day , Try to take it easy old man


love the Hahns

Who Said It?

"They saw that our society was marking time, that it was running the risk of falling hopelessly behind the technologically advanced part of the world. Total domination of centrally-managed state property, the pervasive authoritarian-bureaucratic system, ideology's grip on politics, monopoly in social thought and sciences, militarized industries that siphoned off our best, including the best intellectual resources, the unbearable burden of military expenditures that suffocated civilian industries and undermined the social achievements of the period since the Revolution which were real and of which we used to be proud - such was the actual situation in the country."
 
Is It:
 
1) Part of Hillary's 'Dream of America'
2) A portion communist Gorbachev's Nobel Peace Prize speech
 
"We are all in this together." - Clinton/Marx/Gorbachev

Those Crazy Clintons!

Hillary and her Deputy Chief of Staff Evelyn Lieberman allowed Bill to keep a number of mistresses on the White House staff. Klein repeats the characteristically sketchy claim of a "high-level White House staffer" who tells him that "the assumption among the women in the White House was that Bill took [one staffer] on political trips and that she stayed with him in his hotel room."
 
Liz Moynihan said Hillary is "duplicitous. ... She would say or do anything that would forward her ambitions. She can look you straight in the eye and lie, and sort of not know she's lying. Lying isn't a sufficient word; it's distortion—distorting the truth to fit the case."
 
Klein asserts that when a group of women came to ask Senator Hillary to support the Child Care Bill, she nixed the idea: "It's not going to fly," Hillary supposedly told them. "I'm not going to spend my political capital on something that's doomed before it starts." The leader of the group tells Klein, "I think Hillary's ambition simply got the better of her, and that she will do anything to get to the White House."
 
Hillary kept her own 2008 prospects in mind throughout the Kerry/Edwards campaign. "Think of that famous line of hers from the New Hampshire primary of 1992," an anonymous Democratic politico tells Klein. "She said she'd campaign 'until the last dog dies.' Well, the dogs were still alive and barking when she stopped campaigning for John Kerry."
 
A college classmate of Hillary's tells Klein: "The notion of a woman being a lesbian was fascinating to Hillary. ... But she was much more interested in lesbianism as a political statement than a sexual practice. ... Hillary talked about it a lot, read lesbian literature, and embraced it as a revolutionary concept."
 
Hillary claimed in her memoir Living History that she first learned the truth about Bill and Monica the day that he admitted the affair to the grand jury. Klein asserts that she must have known earlier because she had commissioned Robert Shrum to write a speech for Bill that admitted the truth. (Klein says she then scrapped the speech.)
 
Klein reports that Monica and Bill were able to begin their affair during the 1995 federal government shutdown because a short-staffed Hillary couldn't keep an eye on him. "During this time," a White House source tells Klein, "Bill Clinton was wandering around the White House unchecked. ... Normally, when Hillary's people were there, the President wasn't allowed to wander."

Monday, February 18, 2008

Flatulence!

A BRITISH woman who said she suffered cruel jibes from work colleagues because of her chronic flatulence has lost a discrimination claim.

The unnamed woman said she was taunted by colleagues at Leeds Metropolitan University because she suffered from severe irritable bowel syndrome and claimed disability and racial discrimination against the university, as well as constructive dismissal.

A Leeds employment tribunal was told one workmate said: "She opens the window because she sits there and stinks the place out - we shouldn't have to put up with it."

She told the hearing colleagues would make sniffing noises and "bowel jokes" when she was within earshot.

The three-strong tribunal panel dismissed all three of her claims, the British Press Association reported.

 

In other news, a Norwood man is accused of 'clearing the porch' during a windy evening whilst watching a baseball game.

Friends interviewed said, "It left this rank, dry taste in my mouth. It was like walking into a cloud of Ass."

Facts

RE: THE LEFT

“In 1963, John F. Kennedy was murdered in Texas by a fervent admirer of Cuban dictator Fidel Castro. In 2008, a large Cuban flag emblazoned with the image of Che Guevara, Castro’s brutal henchman, is prominently displayed in a Barack Obama campaign volunteer office in Houston. Obama has been widely compared to JFK, most notably by the late president’s brother and daughter. President Kennedy, a stalwart anticommunist, despised Castro and his gang of totalitarian thugs. But when word broke last week that Obama’s supporters in Houston work under a banner glorifying Che, the campaign’s reaction was to brush it off as an issue involving volunteers, not the official campaign. After two days of controversy, the campaign issued a statement calling the flag ‘inappropriate’ and saying its display ‘does not reflect Senator Obama’s views.’ Would JFK have reacted so mildly?... That this sadistic thug’s face also adorns the office of a U.S. presidential candidate’s supporters is appalling and disgraceful. That the candidate couldn’t bring himself to say so is even worse.”Jeff Jacoby

FOR THE RECORD

“Senator Barack Obama rejects the ‘politics of the past’ while borrowing from its phoniest chapters. His promised caravan toward a new Camelot, with Teddy Kennedy bringing up the rear, may generate feelings in Chris Matthews’ leg and cause women to swoon, but over time it is likely to pall and bore. Obama’s speeches are like cotton candy, sweet but substanceless and dangerous to one’s health if turned into a steady diet. Is he saying nothing? Unfortunately not. Glimpsed through the haze of his sophistical rhetoric is something, and it is tiresomely false, namely, the dogmatic assertion that ‘hope’ and liberalism are synonymous. His reliance on sentiment and rhetoric rather than reasoning to advance that assertion will not inspire a new politics of bipartisan unity but revive old and bitter resentments. Liberalism, after all, has no monopoly on hope, and the chapters of history to which Obama makes implicit reference—the New Frontier and Great Society—concluded in despair. While the Democrats won’t stop squealing over him for some time, the larger culture has already begun to mock Obama as a platitudinous lightweight.” —George Neumayr

POLITICAL FUTURES

“Up to now, the force of Sen. Obama’s physical presentation has so dazzled audiences that it has been hard to focus on precisely what he is saying. ‘Yes, we can! Yes, we can!’ Can what? Listen closely to that... speech. Unhinge yourself from the mesmerizing voice. What one hears is a message that is largely negative, illustrated with anecdotes of unremitting bleakness. Heavy with class warfare, it is a speech that could have been delivered by a Democrat in 1968, or even 1928... It is a depressing message to ride all the way to the White House... In late December, Gallup released a poll in which 84% of respondents said they were satisfied with their own lives. At some point in the next 10 months, people will have to square Sen. Obama’s Grapes of Wrath message with the reality of their lives. Unease about the economy is real, but Sen. Obama is selling more than that. He is selling deep grievance over the structure of American society. That’s the same message as John Edwards, or Dennis Kucinich for that matter.” —Daniel Henninger

OPINION IN BRIEF

“Journalists cannot serve two masters. To the extent that they take on the task of suppressing information or biting their tongue for the sake of some political agenda, they are betraying the trust of the public and corrupting their own profession. It is bad enough that politicians betray their followers as a matter of expediency. It is real chutzpah when they demand that journalists betray the public trust as a matter of principle, for the benefit of politicians. Some journalists—too many, in fact—do jump on the bandwagon of particular candidates or particular political agendas, and end up filtering and spinning the news as a result. Those who are on the ‘global warming’ bandwagon, for example, endlessly repeat that the polar ice cap in the arctic is shrinking—while filtering out the fact that the polar ice cap in the Antarctic is growing... Whether one is for or against the ‘global warming’ crusade or for or against Democrats or Republicans in the White House, the truth is the truth—and filtering out facts is betraying the public that has turned to the media for information. It is legitimate to argue for or against those who believe that global warming justifies one policy or another. That is an honest expression of opinion. But filtering the facts is not. Some in the media seem to think that a noble cause justifies withholding facts on the other side.” —Thomas Sowell

 

 

The Clinton Plan

MILWAUKEE (AP) -- Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton's campaign released a 13-page blueprint for fixing the economy Monday, detailing the former first lady's plans to achieve universal health care, address the home foreclosure crisis and develop jobs for the middle class.

The pamphlet, which will be distributed to voters at campaign events and posted online, outlines many of the ideas she talks about on the campaign trail each day. But by pulling them together, the document resembles a populist manifesto -- with Clinton championing the needs of working-class voters over corporate and business interests. [Holy Crap. Pure Communism...]

''Over the past seven years, big corporations and special interests have been given a free pass to profit, often at the expense of the American worker [Marx said exactly the same thing]. As President, Hillary will make it a priority to scale back special benefits and subsidies to these corporations and put those resources to work for our economy again,'' the pamphlet declares [The pamplet fails to declare, however, what will happen when those corporations flee overseas leaving a wave of unemployment behind].

Among other things, the document stresses Clinton's plan to freeze home foreclosures and subprime adjustable rate mortgages -- a plan some economists believe would raise interest rates on other consumers [a plan that is bad all around. Hillary is basically saying "if you were too stupid to overextend yourselves to buy a house at predatory rates, the government will 'save' you. Good one].

It also describes Clinton's plan for creating new jobs through investments in infrastructure projects like roads, bridges and levees and ''green-collar'' jobs that would help reduce dependence on foreign oil [Gonna need those green-collar jobs. All the White-Collar jobs will be in India...].

The New York senator also details her ideas for improving trade agreements, making college more affordable [by government largess] and expanding family and medical leave programs [by government largess...Is there no end?].

''Hillary's plan to rein in the special interests will take back at least $55 billion per year from drug companies [no it won't], oil companies [nope...] and firms that ship jobs overseas [and no again] and invest those resources to improve the lives of working families,'' the pamphlet said.

Communist/Socialist Hillary.

"We're all in this together." - Marx

McCain is looking better each day...unfortunately. Well, at least McCain will not run from our enemies and allow them to attack us again on U.S. soil like Hillary and Obama will...That would be TWICE for the Clintons...

Reconnoiter

For those of you spacially-challenged, here are the nitty-gritty logistics of driving out there and attempting a few baseball games.

First, the July Home Schedule for Chicago White Sox, Detroit Tigers, and Cleveland Indians:

Teams Start End
CWS Tues 1-2 vs CLE Tuesday, July 01, 2008 Wednesday, July 02, 2008
CWS Thurs 3-6 vs OAK Thursday, July 03, 2008 Sunday, July 06, 2008
DET Tues 8-9 vs CLE Tuesday, July 08, 2008 Wednesday, July 09, 2008
CLE Thurs 10-13 vs TB Thursday, July 10, 2008 Sunday, July 13, 2008
DET Thurs 10-13 vs MIN Thursday, July 10, 2008 Sunday, July 13, 2008
CWS Fri 18-20 vs KC Friday, July 18, 2008 Sunday, July 20, 2008
CWS Mon 21-23 vs TEX Monday, July 21, 2008 Wednesday, July 23, 2008
CLE Fri 25-27 vs MIN Friday, July 25, 2008 Sunday, July 27, 2008
DET Fri 25-27 vs CWS Friday, July 25, 2008 Sunday, July 27, 2008
CLE Mon 28-31 vs DET Monday, July 28, 2008 Thursday, July 31, 2008

Travel Distances between the three cities and Boston:
Chicago ==> 4.5 hrs ==> Detroit ==> 2.5 hrs ==> Cleveland ==> 10 hrs ==> Boston

This means, going from WEST to EAST, chicago is 4.5 hrs WEST of Detroit. Detroit is 2.5 hrs WEST of Cleveland, and cleveland is 10 hrs WEST of Boston.

I'd stay away from Detroit at night.

Sunday, February 17, 2008

Metaphysics through humor

Metaphysics tackles the Big Questions head on:
What is Being? What is the nature of reality? Do we have
free will?How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?
Dimitri: Something's been bothering me lately, Tasso.
Tasso: What's that?
Dmitri: What is the meaning of it all?
Tasso: All what?
Dmitri: You know, life, death, love...the whole stuffed grape leaf.
Tasso: What makes you think any of it has any meaning?
Dmitri:Because it has to. Otherwise life would just be....
Tasso: What?
Dmitri: I need an Ouzo.

Saturn

here is a pretty amazing photo of Saturn back-lit by the Sun, taken in 2006 by the Cassini Sattelite:

Gnilleps - or, "Are You Smarter than a 5th Grader?"

To complete this Gnilleps you must your team much spell each word, one letter at a time, backwards going from teammate to teammate.

What is your order?

Girls: we will go Diane, Celeste and Christa.

Ok, diane, you go first. I'll say the word then start the timer.

The word is "cat"...

Di: "T"
Cella: "A"
Crit: "uh, uh, ...."K"!

[BZZZZZZZ] Wrong.

The Next word is "Juices"

Di: "S"
Cella: "E"
Crit: Uh, uh, ... "C"!
Di: "I"
Cella: "U"
Crit: Uh, uh,..."G"?

[BZZZZZZZZ] Wrong again.

Final word: "jalapenos"
Di: "S"
Cella: "O"
Crit: "N"
Di: "E"
Cella: "P"
Crit: "A"
Di: "L"
Cella: "A"
Crit: Uh, uh... "H"!

[BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ] Wrong again.

Looks like it's going to be a long night for the X-Chromosomes....

Saturday, February 16, 2008

Clinton Facts

Bill Clinton dispatched the american military 44 times overseas during his eight years. The U.S. Military had been deployed outside of America only 8 times in the previous 45 years.

Bill Clinton helped spread Islamic Radicalism into Europe in his anti-Serb campaigns in the Balkans, siding with Muslims against the Serbs, helping import mujahedin (radical Islamist Jihadists) from the Middle East. Richard Holbrooke, Clinton's Chief Peace Negotiator, called it "a pact with the devil."

The Clinton administration propoganda machine quoted 100,000 to 400,000 'massacred Albanian Muslims" in support of his unconstitutional war. Spanish surgeon Emilio Perez Pujol, dispatched to uncover Serbian attrocities, reported that "we did not find one - not one - mass grave." He added, "The final figure of dead in Kosovo will be 2,500 at most. This includes lots of strange deaths that can't be blamed on anyone in particular."

During the Clinton Years, at the Pentagon, special permission was required for the promotion of all white men without disabilities.

The U.S. Forest Service, having not hired enough female firefighters, posted a job announcement that read "Only unqualified applicants may apply." A later announcement read "Only applicants who do not meet [job requirement] standards will be considered." Amazingly, the positions sat vacant due to a lack of unqualified applicants.

Mogadishu: President G.H.W.B. intended the U.S. Military to deliver humanitarian aid and withdraw. Bill Clinton expanded that mission to include nation-building and the pursuit of warlords. Major General Thomas Montgomery, commander of U.S. Forces in Somalia, requested additional tanks, armored fighting vehicles, and gunships. He was denied these resources by the Clinton Administration. A month later Clinton sent 14 gunships with Delta Force Rangers to seize members of the Somali National Alliance at the Olympic hotel in Mogadishu. 18 Americans died; eighty were wounded.

Hillary denied that she knew her brother lobbied President Clinton for pardons. This was later proved false and an outright lie.



Source: The Politically Incorrect Guide to American History

Moon Movie

Here's something pretty cool. It's a time-lapse movie of the appearance of the Moon over one lunation. A lunation is a lunar month, during which time the Moon completely circles the Earth in its orbit.

Lunation Movie

Friday, February 15, 2008

Are you replaceable?

Are you replaceable?
 
There has been much conversation about illegal immigration in the United States and what effects it has on government programs such as Medicare and Welfare, to name just a few. However, have you ever considered what the chances really are of your job being taken by an illegal immigrant made legal by the amnesty bill up for vote?
 
This bill wants to give a 'temporary 5-year visa' to all illegal immigrants (Note: just 2 years ago the government finally abolished the 'temporary phone tax' that was put into law - the 3% temporary tax that Congress levied on long distance calls in 1898 in order to raise money to pay for combat operations during the Spanish American war. That defies the definition of "temporary").
 
But how 'safe' would your job be? How likely would it be that a newly doctrined 'American' could take your job?
 
Do the math: It is likely that your job is vulnerable if you can complete training for your job inside of 1 month. And, it is even more likely the government will encourage that training with free money/training for these newly americanized people.
 
So if you took a class for a few weeks to 'learn your trade', be very aware that the Amnesty Bill will likely expose your job to a person willing to do it for less money than you are being paid now. And, because the fine politicians of Massachusetts have declared Boston 'friendly to illegal immigrants', expect an influx of 'americans' to head north soon.
 
Ah, the smell of opportunity!
 
If it smells like bunk, it probably is.

Creative advertising III


Yuk!

Creative advertising II

I'm sorry Mark....I tried,
but I just couldn't find a copy of
Pap in his jockeys :)

Please Read - It's that important

I believe that if you love this country, you'll understand this speech and realize how right this man is. Don't be fooled (like the republicans were) by fake republicans and 'free, bigger government'. Nothing is free. Everyone that reads this blog is probably going to have substantial tax increases once either of the three democrats get in - Obama, Hillary, or McCain.

I also believe that there are some people who think it is time for change, and leave the discussion to end there. Change can be change for the good, or change for the bad. It is my belief that no presidential candidate at this point in time offers 'good' change. They all offer bigger government, which de Facto makes increasing taxes a requirement. I'd like to think that all of you are smarter than that and are not deceived/fooled by the current democratic 'platform' platitudes of bigger government, tax cuts, and universal healthcare. Bigger government and universal healthcare are incompatible with tax cuts - that is a provable fact, something liberals have a problem with - facts. Universal Healthcare is not the answer for this country, as Hillary and Obama would have you believe. It has failed in every society it has been thrust upon, miserably.

The following is a transcript of Mitt Romney's speech at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington, D.C., during which he announced he is suspending his presidential campaign, as provided by CQ Transcriptions via The Associated Press.

FEBRUARY 7, 2008

SPEAKER: FORMER GOV. MITT ROMNEY, R-MASS.

ROMNEY: Thank you, guys. Thank you.

AUDIENCE: Mitt! Mitt! Mitt! Mitt!

ROMNEY: What an honor. What an honor to be here. Thank you.

(APPLAUSE)

Thank you so much. What a welcome. That is so fabulous. And it's such an honor to be introduced by Laura Ingraham.

You know, we have all the fun. The people in our party, they're gorgeous, they're brilliant. It's wonderful to have Laura Ingraham on our side. You know that? She is wonderful.

(APPLAUSE)

Thanks to her and all the talk radio for what they do to keep the conservative movement strong and alive and vibrant. And I appreciate her generous introduction.

And I love being introduced as the "conservatives' conservative." And that's exactly how I feel.

Thank you.

(APPLAUSE)

I was also proud to be joined by my wife. You know my wife, Anne. She was here with me. And our five boys have been out campaigning. They're fabulous. It's been a family affair.

(APPLAUSE)

I want to begin today by thanking you. It was a real honor to be here last year. It's great to be here with you again. And I look forward to joining you many, many more times in the future.

(APPLAUSE)

Now, last year -- last year CPAC gave me the send-off I needed. At the time, I was in single digits in the polls, and I was facing household names in the Republican contest. As of today, more than 4 million people have given me their vote for president. That's good, yes.

(APPLAUSE)

That's, of course, less than Senator McCain's 4.7 million, but quite a statement, nonetheless.

Eleven states have given me their nod, compared to his 13. Thank you to those 11.

(APPLAUSE)

Of course, because size does matter, he's doing quite a bit better with the number of delegates he's got.

(LAUGHTER)

Now, to all of you, thank you, here, for caring enough about America to show up, to speak up, to stand up for conservative principles.

(APPLAUSE)

As I said to you last year, conservative principles are needed now more than ever. We face a new generation of challenges: challenges which threaten our prosperity, our security and our future.

I'm convinced that unless America changes course, we could become the France of the 21st century.

(BOOING)

ROMNEY: Still a great nation, but not the leader of the world, not the superpower. And to me that's unthinkable.

Look, it was a while ago Shimon Peres came to Boston for a visit. He was asked what he thought about the war in Iraq.

"First," he said, "I have to put something in context." He said, "America is unique in the history of the world. In the history of the world," he said, "whenever there's been conflict, the nation that wins takes land from the nation that loses. One nation in history, and this during the last century, laid down hundreds of thousands of lives and took no land: no land from Germany, no land from Korea, no land from Japan. America," he said, "is unique in the sacrifice it has made for liberty, for itself and for freedom-loving people around the world."

And Colin Powell added, "The only land we took after the last great conflict was enough land to bury our dead."

The best ally peace has ever known and will ever know is a strong America.

(APPLAUSE)

And that's why it is that we have to rise to the occasion, as we've always done before, to confront the challenge that are ahead of us.

Perhaps the most fundamental of the challenges that we face is the attack on America's culture.

Over the years my business took me to a lot of different countries, and I've been struck by the enormous differences in the wealth and the well-being of people from different nations. I've read a number of scholarly explanations for the disparities, and I've found the most convincing was written by a fellow named David Landes.

ROMNEY: He's a professor emeritus at Harvard University. I presume he's a liberal. I guess that's redundant.

(LAUGHTER)

And his work traces the coming and going of great civilizations throughout history. And after hundreds of pages of analysis, he concludes with this, and I quote: "If we learn anything from the history of economic development it is that culture makes all the difference." Culture makes all the difference.

What is it about America's culture that's led us to become the most powerful nation in the history of the world?

Well, we believe in hard work and education. We love opportunity. Almost all of us are immigrants or descendants of immigrants who came here for opportunity. Opportunity's in our DNA.

Americans love God, and those who don't have faith typically believe in something greater than themself, a purpose-driven life, if you will.

And we sacrifice as Americans everything we have, even our lives, for our families, for our freedoms and for our country.

These values and beliefs of free American people are the source of the nation's strength, and they always will be.

(APPLAUSE)

The threat to our culture comes from within.

In the 1960s, there were welfare programs that created a culture of poverty in our country. Now, some people think we won that battle when we reformed welfare. But the liberals haven't given up.

At every turn, they tried to substitute government largess for individual responsibility. They fight to strip work requirements from welfare, to put more people on Medicaid, and remove more and more people from having to pay any income tax whatsoever.

Dependency is death to initiative, risk-taking and opportunity. Dependency is culture killing. It's a drug. We've got to fight it like the poison it is.

(APPLAUSE)

ROMNEY: The attack on faith and religion is no less relentless. And tolerance for pornography, even celebration of it, and sexual promiscuity, combined with the twisted incentives of government welfare, have led to today's grim realities: 68 percent of African- American kids born out of wedlock, 45 percent of Hispanic kids, 25 percent of white kids.

How much harder it is for these kids to succeed in school and in life. A nation built on the principles of the founding fathers cannot long stand when its children are raised without fathers in the home.

(APPLAUSE)

The development of a child is enhanced by having a mother and a father. Such a family is the ideal for the future of the child and for the strength of the nation.

I wonder how it is that unelected judges, like some in my state of Massachusetts, are so unaware of this reality, so oblivious to the millennia of recorded history.

It's time for the people of America to fortify marriage through a constitutional amendment, so that liberal judges cannot continue to attack it.

(APPLAUSE)

Europe -- Europe is facing a demographic disaster.

ROMNEY: That's the inevitable product of weakened faith in the Creator, failed families, disrespect for the sanctity of human life, and eroded morality.

Some reason that culture is merely an accessory to America's vitality. We know that it's the source of our strength. And we will not be dissuaded by the snickers and knowing glances when we stand up for family values and morality and culture. We will...

(APPLAUSE)

Conservatives here and conservatives across the country will always be honored to stand on principle and to stand for principles.

The attack on our culture is not the only a challenge that we face. We face economic competition unlike anything we have known before.

China, and Asia are emerging from centuries of poverty. Their people are plentiful, innovative and ambitious.

If we don't change course, Asia or China will pass us by as the economic superpower, just as we passed England and France during the last century.

The prosperity and security of our children and grandchildren depend on us.

Our prosperity and security also depend on finally acting to become energy-secure. Oil-producing states like Russia and Venezuela, Saudi Arabia and Iran are siphoning over $400 billion out of our economy. That's almost what we spent annually for our national defense.

It is past time for us to invest in energy technology: nuclear power, clean coal, liquid coal, renewable resources, energy efficiency.

(APPLAUSE)

Simply put, America must never be held hostage by the likes of Putin, Chavez and Ahmadinejad.

(LOUD APPLAUSE)

ROMNEY: Our economy is also burdened by the inexorable ramping up of government spending.

And let's be careful: Let's not just focus on the pork alone, even though it is indeed irritating and shameful. Look also at the entitlements. They make up 60 percent of federal spending today. And by the end of the next president's second term they will total 70 percent.

Any conservative plan for the future has to include entitlement reform that solves the problem, not just acknowledges it.

(APPLAUSE)

You know, I've found that most politicians don't seem to understand the connection between our ability to compete and our national wealth and the wealth of our families. They act as if money just happens, that it just happens to be there.

But every dollar represents a good or service that's been produced in the private sector. If you depress the private sector you depress the well-being of all Americans.

That's exactly what happens with high taxes, over-regulation, tort windfalls, mandates, and overfed, overspending government.

Did you happen to see, by the way, that today government workers make more money than people who work in the private sector? Can you imagine what happens to an economy where the best opportunities are for bureaucrats?

It is high time to lower taxes, including corporate taxes, to take a weed whacker...

(APPLAUSE)

Get out -- get out that weed whacker and take it to regulations and reform entitlements and, by the way, stand up to the increasingly voracious appetite of the unions in our government.

(APPLAUSE)

And finally, let's consider the greatest challenge facing America, and for that matter facing the entire civilized world: the threat of radical, violent jihad.

(APPLAUSE)

As you know, in one wing of the world of Islam there's a conviction that all governments should be destroyed and replaced by a religious caliphate. These jihadists will battle any form of democracy because to them democracy is blasphemous, because it says that citizens, not God, shape the law.

ROMNEY: They find the idea of human equality to be equally offensive. They hate everything we believe about freedom just as we hate everything they believe about radical jihad.

To battle this threat, we've sent the most courageous and brave soldiers in the world.

(APPLAUSE)

But their numbers have been depleted by the Clinton years, when troops were reduced by 500,000, when almost 80 ships were retired from our Navy, and when our human intelligence was slashed by 25 percent.

We were told we were getting a peace dividend. We got the dividend; we didn't get the peace.

(APPLAUSE)

In the face of evil and radical jihad, and given the inevitable military ambitions of China, we must act to rebuild our military might, raise military spending to 4 percent of our GDP, purchase the most modern armament, reshape our fighting forces for the asymmetric demands we now face, and give the veterans the care they deserve.

(APPLAUSE)

Soon the face of liberalism in America will have a new name. Whether it's Barack or Hillary, the result would be the same if they were to be able to...

(BOOING)

... if they were to be able to win the presidency.

ROMNEY: The opponents of American culture would push the throttle, devising new justifications for judges to depart from the Constitution. And economic neophytes would layer heavier and heavier burdens on employers and families, slowing our economy, opening the way for foreign competition to further erode our lead.

Even though we face an uphill fight, I know that many in this room are fully behind my campaign.

(APPLAUSE)

AUDIENCE: Mitt! Mitt! Mitt! Mitt!

ROMNEY: You are with me all the way to the convention. Fight on, just like Ronald Reagan did in 1976.

(APPLAUSE)

But there is an important difference from 1976. Today we are a nation at war. And Barack and Hillary have made their intentions clear regarding Iraq and the war on terror: They would retreat, declare defeat.

And the consequence of that would be devastating. It would mean attacks on America, launched from safe havens that would make Afghanistan under the Taliban look like child's play. About this, I have no doubt.

Now, I disagree with Senator McCain on a number of issues, as you know.

But I agree with him on doing whatever it takes to be successful in Iraq, and finding and executing Osama bin Laden.

(APPLAUSE)

And I agree with him on eliminating Al Qaida and terror worldwide.

Now, if I fight on, in my campaign, all the way to the convention...

ROMNEY: ... I want you to know, I've given this a lot of thought -- I'd forestall the launch of a national campaign and, frankly, I'd make it easier for Senator Clinton or Obama to win.

Frankly, in this time of war, I simply cannot let my campaign be a part of aiding a surrender to terror.

(APPLAUSE)

This isn't an easy decision. I hate to lose.

My family, my friends, you, my supporters across the country, you've given a great deal to get me to where I have a shot to becoming president. If this were only about me, I'd go on. But it's never been only about me.

I entered this race -- I entered this race because I love America. And because I love America, in this time of war, I feel I have to now stand aside for our party and for our country.

AUDIENCE: No! No!

ROMNEY: You guys are great.

(APPLAUSE)

I will continue to stand for conservative principles. I'll fight alongside you for all the things we believe in. And one of the things we believe in is that we cannot allow the next president of the United States to retreat in the face of evil extremism.
(APPLAUSE)

It is the common task of each generation and the burden of liberty to preserve this country, expand its freedoms and renew its spirit, so that its noble past is prologue to its glorious future.

To this task, accepting this burden, we're all dedicated. And I firmly believe, by the providence of the Almighty, that we will succeed beyond our fondest hope.

America must always remain, as it has always been, the hope of the Earth.

Thank you so very much. I love you. Thank you.

(APPLAUSE)

END

Creative Advertising?

Not so sure that the bottom of a cup a joe
is the place to show them "Pearly Whites"

Meet Tiktaalik!

Thursday, February 14, 2008

Joke

“Obama is just creaming Hillary. You know, all these primaries, you know. And Hillary says it’s not fair, because they’re being held in February, and February is Black History Month.

And unfortunately for Hillary, there’s no White Bitch Month.”

Latest Assault on The Constitution

Posted in Politics, Constitution by Jerry McDaniel on the September 19th, 2007

Senate Republicans today (9/19/2007) turned back the latest attack on the constitution with a 57 to 42 vote against cloture. The legislation under consideration was a bill designed to bypass the Constitution and allow the District of Columbia one seat in the House of Representatives. The bill would also add one seat for the state of Utah, which will probably qualify for an additional seat after the 2010 census anyway. The bill previously passed in the House of Representatives by a lopsided vote of 241 to 177. Proponents have attempted to sell the bill as a voting rights bill, and as a civil rights bill. Democrats will no doubt use its defeat as a political tool against the Republican Party.

The District is predominately African-American. “During a rally at the Dirksen Senate Office Building the Mayor of Washington declared, “Not since segregation has the Senate blocked a voting rights bill. And this is a voting rights bill,” Supporters were depending on the emotional appeal generated by the public’s sense of fairness to get the bill through the Senate and to the President for his signature. President Bush has indicated he would veto the bill if it passed in Congress.

This is not the type of legislation that garners a lot of interest on the part of the voting public. Thanks to our liberal education system, the average citizen does not realize the significance of this effort to bypass the requirements of the Constitution. The framers thought the seat of government should not be a part of any one state and in Article I, Section 8 they gave Congress the power “To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States.

Most Americans are not well educated in the fine points of the Constitution and many of them do not understand the intended purpose or structure of the Federal Government. The original concept of the founders as enshrined in the Constitution was a republic with a republican form of government. Most people think of it as a democracy with a federalist form of government. As originally established the Federal government was not intended to directly represent individual citizens, but rather individual states.

Congress was divided into two houses. Members of the House of Representatives were to be the representatives of the people. They were to be elected directly by the majority vote of citizens of their respective districts in each state and were accountable to those citizens for their performance in congress. The Senate was intended to represent the interest of its members’ respective states. Senators were elected by their state legislatures and were accountable to the legislatures for their performance.

The method for electing Senators was changed by Constitutional Amendment (Article 17) in 1912 and ratified by the states in 1913. Since that time, Senators have been elected by a direct vote of the citizens of each state. This change makes them accountable to the voters rather than the state legislatures. It also stripped away any control the states had over federal legislation and facilitated the growth of federal bureaucracies and regulations placing onerous burdens on state governments in compliance.

A similar effort has been underway for years to do away with the Electoral College for electing the president. Under the current system, each state appoints electors in relation to the state’s population, who in turn vote for the president. Most states appoint electors who support the candidate that gets the majority vote in the state. The process is spelled out in Article II, Section I of the Constitution. This system sometimes results in a president being elected with less than a majority of the popular vote but it lessens the probability of states with large population centers from unduly influencing who will be elected president.

During my lifetime, the population of the United States has almost doubled. Most of the increase has been in large cities. Many of these cities have liberal Democrat governments with a miserable record of governance. Often these cities are controlled by a political “machine” such as the one in Chicago where the Daley family has presided for the past 60 years with only a short break between the death of the first Mayor Richard Daley and his son, the Current Mayor Richard Daley.

In many places the distinction between city and county governments are being eliminated in favor of a metropolitan government including the city and its suburbs. If the population trends continue for another fifty or hundred years the population centers would be concentrated in a few dozen megalopolises along the East and West coasts with a few scattered around the rest of the country. Should the effort to do away with the Electoral College succeed, presidents could be elected just with the votes from these megalopolises. An alliance between political “machines’ or “bosses” in these areas could effectively decide the presidency.

One of these future megalopolises would no doubt be Washington, D.C. Although the Constitution limits Washington’s geographical boundaries to ten miles square, its political influence would extend throughout the entire metropolitan area. Being the seat of the national government its power would naturally be multiplied many times in comparison to other parts of the country.

Should D.C. be successful in getting a seat in the House of Representatives without a Constitutional amendment it will only be a matter of time until they will demand two senators. Then we would have a de facto state equal to any other state containing the seat of our federal government. Experience has shown we cannot always count on the courts to protect our system of elections. Therefore, it is important that we demand our legislators hold the line against tinkering with our electoral system by either law or amendment.

Assault On The Constitution: Part 2
Posted in Commentary, Politics, Constitution by Jerry McDaniel on the September 19th, 2007
In my previous post “New Assault on The Constitution” (see below); I focused on the unconstitutionality of the Congress’ attempt to add a House seat for the District of Columbia, which is not a state. Due to shortage of space I did not deal with an even more disturbing fact; the number of Senators and Congressmen willing to ignore the Constitution for political gain. 241 of 435 members of the House voted to add two seats to the House of Representatives knowing it was clearly in violation of the U.S. Constitution. 56 of 100 Senators did the same thing.

If we can learn anything from this disgraceful display of political self-interest, it is that too many of our elected officials have no regard for the Constitution they are sworn to uphold and defend. It is clearly time to clean house in Washington. No one who voted for this bill should be re-elected no matter which party they belong to. Our Constitution is the only thing standing between us and tyranny. For our own well-being, we should not tolerate any Congressman or Senator who is not willing to preserve and protect that Constitution.

There are times when two well meaning and patriotic persons can honestly disagree about what the Constitution allows or doesn’t allow. This is not one of them. It is clear that those who wrote, signed and ratified the Constitution did not intend the seat of our government to be represented in the House and Senate. Most of those who participated in the birth of our nation continued for many years in public office. At least five of them served as President of the United States: Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Madison and Monroe.

They, of all people, should know what the framers intended when they required a separate area for the federal capital that was apart from the territory of any state, and when they only made provisions for states to be represented in Congress . Should a mistake have been made, they had plenty of time and opportunity to correct it during their lifetime. There is not an iota of evidence in the history of that time period that not having the Capital represented in Congress was either a mistake or an oversight.

Even more egregious were the actions of Senators Hatch and Bennett the two Republican Senators of the state of Utah. As part of the deal to secure support for the bill it was agreed that in addition to the new House seat for the District of Columbia, which is overwhelmingly Democrat, an additional seat would be added to the delegation from Utah which is predominately Republican. The Senators were so eager to speed up what is expected to be a legitimate addition of a Utah House seat due to population increase after the 2010 census, that they agreed to support this bill.

There are a couple of explanations for this untoward activity on the part of Congress. I do not believe for a minute that any one who voted for the bill is sincerely interested in whether or not the citizens of Washington, D.C. are represented in Congress. According to Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution, the District of Columbia has 535 members of Congress who are charged with the responsibility of looking out for the interest of its citizens. In addition, it has a non-voting member of Congress who acts as a lobbyist on its behalf.

The most plausible explanation for this fiasco is that the Democrat Party is so anxious to increase their political power in Congress they are willing to overlook the Constitution in order to add a predominately Democrat constituency to their rolls. A second possible explanation is an attempt to embarrass the Republican Party by forcing it to oppose a clearly unconstitutional bill that would supposedly benefit a predominately African-American population.

In any case, should the Democrats win a large majority in the next election we can expect to deal with a continuing steam of assaults on the Constitution. If in addition to a Congressional majority they should also take the White House, we are in real trouble.

Kissing

"Right-handedness is much more common, by about 8 to 1, but social pressures on children to not be left-handed are strong."
 
Another liberal policy, discriminating against lefties. Well:
 
We're Not Gonna Take It
no, We Ain't Gonna Take It
oh We're Not Gonna Take It Anymore

we've Got The Left To Choose And
there Ain't No Way We'll Lose It
this Is Our Life, This Is Our Song
we'll Fight The Powers That Be Just
don't Pick Our Destiny 'cause
you Don't Know Us, You Don't Belong

oh We're Not Gonna Take It
no, We Ain't Gonna Take It
oh We're Not Gonna Take It Anymore

oh You're So Condescending
your Gall Is Never Ending
we Don't Want Nothin', Not A Thing From You
your Life Is Trite And Jaded
boring And Confiscated
"if That's Your Left, Your Left Won't Do..."

oh.....................
oh.....................
we're Lefties/yeah
we're Free/yeah
we'll Fight/yeah
you'll See/yeah

oh We're Not Gonna Take It
no, We Ain't Gonna Take It
oh We're Not Gonna Take It Anymore

oh We're Not Gonna Take It
no, We Ain't Gonna Take It
oh We're Not Gonna Take It Anymore
no Way!

oh.....................
oh.....................
we're Lefties/yeah
we're Free/yeah
we'll Fight/yeah
you'll See/yeah

we're Not Gonna Take It
no, We Ain't Gonna Take It
we're Not Gonna Take It Anymore

we're Not Gonna Take It, No!
no, We Ain't Gonna Take It
we're Not Gonna Take It Anymore

just You Try And Make Us Righties
we're Not Gonna Take It
come On
no, We Ain't Gonna Take It
you're All Worthless And Liberal
we're Not Gonna Take It Anymore
now Drop And Give Me Twenty
we're Not Gonna Take It
oh Crinch Pin
no, We Ain't Gonna Take It
oh You And Your Right-handedness
we're Not Gonna Take It Anymore
 
:)
 
A Babies arm holding an apple.

The History of Valentine's Day

St. Valentine's Day: 5th Century Rome

"...The Catholic Church's attempt to paper over a popular pagan fertility rite with the clubbing death and decapitation of one of its own martyrs is the origin of this lovers' holiday. "

As early as the fourth century B.C., the Romans engaged in an annual young man's rite of passage to the god Lupercus. The names of teenage women were placed in a box and drawn at random by adolescent men; thus, a man was assigned a woman companion, for their mutual entertainment and pleasure (often sexual), for the duration of a year, after which another lottery was staged [not a half-bad idea]. Determined to put an end to this eight-hundred-year-old practice, the early church fathers sought a "lovers" saint to replace the deity Lupercus. They found a likely candidate in Valentine, a bishop who had been martyred some two hundred years earlier.

In Rome in A.D. 270, Valentine had enraged the mad emperor the mad emperor Claudius II [verifiably insane], who had issued an edict forbidding marriage. Claudius felt that married men made poor soldiers, because they were loath to leave their families for battle. The empire needed soldiers, so Claudius, never one to fear unpopularity, abolished marriage.

Valentine, bishop of Interamna, invited young lovers to come to him in secret, where he joined them in the sacrament of matrimony. Claudius learned of this "friend of lovers," and had the bishop brought to the palace. The emperor, impressed with the young priest's dignity and conviction, attempted to convert him to the Roman gods, to save him from otherwise certain execution. Valentine refused to renounce Christianity and imprudently attempted to convert the emperor. On February 24, 270, Valentine was clubbed, stoned, then beheaded.

History also claims that while Valentine was in prison awaiting execution, he fell in love with the blind daughter of the jailer, Asterius. Through his unswerving faith, he miraculously restored her sight. He signed a farewell message to her "From Your Valentine," a phrase that would live long after its author died.

From the Church's standpoint, Valentine seemed to be the ideal candidate to usurp the popularity of Lupercus. So in A.D. 496, a stern Pope Gelasius outlawed the mid-February Lupercian festival. But he was clever enough to retain the lottery, aware of Romans' love for games of chance. Now into the box that had once held the names of available and willing single women were placed the names of saints. Both men and women extracted slips of paper, and in the ensuing year they were expected to emulate the life of the saint whose name they had drawn. Admittedly, it was a different game, with different incentives; to expect a woman and draw a saint must have disappointed many a Roman male. The spiritual overseer of the entire affair was its patron saint, Valentine. With reluctance, and the passage of time, more and more Romans relinquished their pagan festival and replaced it with the Church's holy day.

PMS Survival Guide

The Hormone Guide (PMS Survival)

Women will understand this! Men should memorize it!
Every woman knows that there are days in the month when all a man has to do is open his mouth and he takes his life in his hands! This is a handy guide that should be as common as a driver's license in the wallet of every husband, boyfriend, co-worker, or significant other!

DANGEROUS:
What's for dinner?
SAFER:
Can I help you with dinner?
SAFEST:
Where would you like to go for dinner?
ULTRA SAFE:
Here, have some wine.

DANGEROUS:
Are you wearing that?
SAFER:
Wow, you sure look good in brown!
SAFEST:
WOW! Look at you!
ULTRA SAFE:
Here, have some wine

DANGEROUS:
What are you so worked up about?
SAFER:
Could we be overreacting?
SAFEST:
Here's my paycheck.
ULTRA SAFE:
Here, have some wine.

DANGEROUS:
Should you be eating that?
SAFER:
You know, there are a lot of apples left.
SAFEST:
Can I get you a piece of chocolate with that?
ULTRA SAFE:
Here, have some wine.

DANGEROUS:
What did you DO all day?
SAFER:
I hope you didn't over-do it today.
SAFEST:
I've always loved you in that robe!
ULTRA SAFE:
Here, have some wine .

13 Things PMS Stands For:
1. Pass My Shotgun
2. Psychotic Mood Shift
3. Perpetual Munching Spree
4. Puffy Mid-Section
5. People Make me Sick
6. Provide Me with Sweets
7. Pardon My Sobbing
8. Pimples May Surface
9. Pass My Sweat pants
10. Pissy Mood Syndrome
11. Plainly; Men Suck
12. Pack My Stuff
AND MY FAVORITE ONE
13. Potential Murder Suspect

Tax Alert!

In 1955, Congress declared they would undertake a dramatic simplification of the Tax Code on behalf of small businesses. In the 53 years since that announcement, the tax code has grown a staggering 478% from 172,000 words to over 995,000 words.

Ah, progress. Now you need a degree from one of those liberal colleges (Harvard? UConn?) to decipher it. Or, take your chances with H&R Block or some third-party software.

Government is like that zit on my ass -- it just keeps getting bigger, and bigger, and bigger...

Perhaps I need some ProActiv..."Just a dab, that's all you need.."

 

 

 

Pucker Up, Sweetie, and Tilt Right

You must remember this,
 
A kiss is still . . . an osculatory apposition of the orbicularis oris and levator labii muscles with posterior involvement of the sternocleidomastoids, commonly in a dexterous orientation.
 
A sigh is just a sigh,
 
The fundamental things apply,
 
As Onur Güntürkün of Ruhr University in Bochum, Germany, goes by . . . taking notes.
 

Just in time for Valentine's Day, Dr. Güntürkün, a professor of biopsychology, has produced an analysis of kissing -- to be precise, the angle at which people tilt their heads when they close in for a kiss. It is reported today in Nature magazine.
 
Most people, it turns out, are slant-to-the-right kissers, in about the same proportion to which they are right-legged, right-eyed and right-eared -- two righties for every lefty. Right-handedness is much more common, by about 8 to 1, but social pressures on children to not be left-handed are strong.
 
This subliminal preference for head-turning is learned very early in the womb, Dr. Güntürkün argues. Just as the left and right sides of an embryo are differentiating, he said, ''a torsion of the head to the right is observed shortly after the development of the heart -- asymmetrically positioned -- and the coiling direction of the intestine.''
 
A preference for turning the head to the right, in the final weeks of gestation and first six months of life, has been noted by many child-development specialists.
 
This prejudice, Dr. Güntürkün argues, may live on in what he noted as he watched 124 smooching couples in the airports, train stations and beaches of Germany, the United States and his native Turkey.
 
He ignored cheek-to-cheek kissing, which is governed by cultural kissy-kissy conventions, he said, and looked for couples locking lips.
 
Lip-kissing is ''to some extent independent of a cultural bias,'' he said, and observations on three continents ''further reduced cultural impact by sampling diversity.''
 
He said he was ''as discreet as possible, and I guess most couples didn't sense that they were being observed.'' He added, ''As soon as they had kissed, I walked away.''
 
The couples he saw were aged roughly 13 to 70, he estimated; 64.5 percent turned their heads to the right.
 
When one thing led to another, he counted only the first splashdown.
 
Dr. Güntürkün wants his work taken seriously, though he does know something about billing and cooing -- he is an expert in the eye-brain connections of pigeons, which, after all, are really doves, albeit in urban warfare camo.
 
''I was never interested to study kissing because of kissing,'' he explained. ''I wanted to understand the rules that transform our brains into asymmetrically functioning entities.''
 
He conceded that there was one potential source of bias he could not adjust for and so ignored in his results: theoretically, any given left-kisser should meet more right-kissers and, over an amative lifetime, or even a good year in junior high, be subtly pressured to shift to the right to land a wet one -- or just avoid a broken nose. No?
 
''Yes,'' he admitted. ''But in order to determine this, we'd have to study teenagers, twins and other cohorts over time. I haven't done this. I can't answer that question.''
 
Scientists and lovers, the field is yours.
 
 

Happy Valentine's Day!

I want to say Happy Valentine's Day to my sweetheart and love of my life Celeste.

Your presence in my life has made all the difference to me. I can only hope I have had a similar effect on you.



God Bless You All!

Tonight's Sky

Tonight’s sky chart – looking westward – is nearly the same as last night’s chart. But there is one noticeable difference: the moon is in a different position with respect to the stars.

Full Story Here

Wednesday, February 13, 2008

Prosecutor Seeks to Bar Key Haditha Witness

This is the story of the only Marine that is going to be prosecuted relating to the Haditha case. There were a number of Marines charged initially but SSgt Wuterich is the ONLY ONE going to trial.
Why you ask?
Back at the start of the political investigation of the Main Stream Media called a 'Massacre perpetrated my United States Marine Corps', representative james murtha, d(pa) The only person that I will call a Former Marine, called for the Marines to get the Death Penalty or at minimum Life in Prison. The 'investigation' was in it's infancy, not quite 1/4 of the way through. murtha claimed he was personally briefed by the Commandant of the Marine Corps and had all the details pertaining to the case.
Within a few weeks a few of the 'Haditha Marines' filed Defamation of Character lawsuit against rep murtha,d(pa). Along the way, the other Marines dropped the lawsuit against murtha with the exception of one, SSgt Frank Wuterich.
THE ONLY MARINE STILL BEING PROSECUTED!

Bob


Wednesday, February 13, 2008 11:23 AM

By: Philip V. Brennan

A key witness in the upcoming court-marshal of Staff Sgt. Frank Wuterich should not be allowed to testify in Wuterich’s behalf, the prosecutor claims in a motion filed in the Haditha Marines case.

Wuterich, 27, is being tried for voluntary manslaughter in connection with the killings of 24 Iraqi citizens in the town of Haditha on Nov. 19, 2005, shortly after a roadside bomb hit a Marine convoy, killing the driver of a Humvee and wounding two other Marines.

Maj. Jeffrey Dinsmore, who was the battalion intelligence officer of Wuterich’s unit, has previously revealed that, based on his intelligence briefings, Wuterich and his fellow Kilo Company Marines had been forewarned of a possible insurgent ambush and alerted as to what to look for — in particular a white sedan.

But prosecutor Lt. Col. Sean Sullivan is contending that there is no proof Wuterich and his men were so forewarned.

Dinsmore told Newsmax: “Basically, [Sullivan’s] contention is that my procedures of intelligence dissemination could not guarantee that Frank would know enemy TTP's [tactics, techniques, and procedures], the existence of the white sedan on the BOLO [Be On the Lookout for] list, or the intelligence that indicated that an attack was imminent.

“The legal logic goes that if I didn't look Frank in the eye and give him the Intel personally, then there is no proof he ever knew it, and it is irrelevant to his specific charges. The burden of the defense is to establish the ‘chain of custody’ of information, and to prove that my daily information and warnings reached down to the squad level.”

In a deposition given to Sullivan on March 26, 2007, Maj. Dinsmore testified that his briefings to Wuterich’s unit included information about insurgent TTPs, and warnings about the anticipated appearance of the white car during the ambush.

Wuterich is accused of killing the five occupants of a white car that came on the scene at the time of the attack.

The briefings also warned about the need not to go into suspect structures “soft” — without clearing them first with grenades and gunfire as required in the rules of engagement then in place.

Dinsmore said intelligence about Haditha was received “on about 17 November, prior to the attack, in which Weapons Company conducted an operation down in Albu Hyatt, and they had intelligence reports that Syrians were planning a major operation in Haditha.”

Dinsmore, a decorated up-from-the ranks officer, monitored the day’s action in Haditha via radio reports and a Scan Eagle Unmanned Aerial Vehicle he used to follow the action from above. He filed a report providing full details of combat up the chain of command that very night.

His testimony about the attack warning could be crucial to the defense because Wuterich contends he was acting under proper rules of engagement when he ordered his men to assault several houses, which they cleared with grenades and gunfire.

According to Maj. Dinsmore, Sullivan's motion will likely “focus on the mechanics of how I made sure Sgt. Wuterich received and understood the information — white sedan, enemy TTPs, etc.

“I see the motion like this: When Lt. Col. Sullivan came to my office last year, raided the classified material safe, and seized the materials that I was using to aid the defense … we discussed again what my doubts were about the government's intentions. I openly doubted his ability or willingness to ensure all information was researched and reviewed, even that information that might eliminate his case.

“He was incredulous that I would doubt his willingness to do that. I pled with him to do so. He made a point of giving me his word as an honorable man and as a Marine that he would lay open all information, and if he found information that could potentially exonerate these Marines, he would personally take it to the convening authority and ensure it was seen. This motion doesn't quite live up to that word, as far as I can see.”

Mark Zaid, one of Wuterich’s civilian attorneys told Newsmax: “I can’t imagine that Dinsmore’s testimony won’t be allowed. Major Dinsmore’s testimony is an important piece of the puzzle and I can understand why the prosecution wouldn’t want anyone to know about it. But the fact is that his information about insurgent tactics was conveyed directly to the men … who engaged in battle in Haditha.”

Sullivan, a reserve Marine officer with no combat experience, is a Chicago lawyer who specializes in patent and trademark law, according to his law firm’s Internet site.

Nat Helms, author of the recent book “My Men are Heroes,” has written extensively about Haditha. He said: “Sullivan, who is prosecuting Wuterich, may eventually face some heat of his own for how and why star prosecution witness [Lance Cpl.] Humberto Mendoza managed to get transferred to Sullivan’s Chicago-based reserve unit as a driver after he was granted immunity.

“The defense also wants to know if Sullivan intervened in making [non-U.S. citizen] Mendoza’s immigration problems disappear.

“And finally, the defense wants to know if Mendoza’s lawyers allowed their client to be interviewed by prosecutors hunting for a ‘perfect witness’ before they decided to grant him immunity and provide him the alleged benefits of serving in Chicago instead of staying at Camp Pendleton where he was easily accessible.”

© 2008 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

The Liberal Assault on the Constitution continues

The Liberal Assault on the Constitution continues. I encourage everyone to read the three articles below completely, as well as the 'Stroke of Genius' article that gives sane, constitutionally accurate reasoning:
 
Plan would sidestep Electoral College:
http://www.mercurynews.com/elections/ci_8224431
 
Time to Ditch the Electoral College in Favor of Popular Vote:
http://www.galesburg.com/opinions/x1048107302
 
 
[Question: Do Liberals even read the constitution?...YES. The read the parts they don't like and attempt to enact legislative change...]
 
And from the Sane Side of the Isle:
 
 
Excerpts:
 
A popular vote of the president could mean that candidates basically only have to kowtow to the electorate in Los Angeles and New York for votes and leave the remainder of the population without a voice in government. - Oh, Look Liberals! Isn't that 'disenfranchisement?'
 
disenfranchise: deprive of voting rights
 
When you kowtow to a few states, you deFacto deprive the other, smaller states of voting rights.
 
The founders detested democracy where the majority rules. Democracy as they knew all too well is a tyranny of the majority, and they did not want any type of tyranny at all, whether by one or many.
 
However, like so many other ways in which the United States Constitution has been amended in an improper fashion, NPV and organizations like it are all for changing this part of the Constitution by merely having legislation passed in each state to agree to change the way they allocate their general election votes instead of going through the tougher and proper method as outlined in Article V of the Constitution.
 
One can see results of not following the proper procedures outlined in the amending process by witnessing the crisis in education from not following the Tenth Amendment that limits federal power. Then there is the current monetary crisis by not following the responsibility Congress has of coining money, leaving it up to an independent private banking cartel call the Federal Reserve System, and by not demanding that gold and silver be the only form of money for the payment of debts.
 
The foreign relations crisis exists because Congress has absolved itself of its constitutional duty to declare war giving that responsibility to the president. And by not following the very limited responsibilities given to government in the Constitution, there exists both a health care and immigration crisis in the United States.
 
The reason for all of these and many other crises is due to the fact that American government officials do not follow the dictates of the Constitution and/or have not changed the Constitution in the proper and constitutional manner.
 
Not following the Constitution in electing the president would allow the majority to rule over the minority and would cause disarray nationwide like that seen in the 2000 presidential election in Florida which required numerous recounts and court battles.
 
FOLLOW THE CONSTITUTION
 
 

Westminster Dog Show Photos












Red Sox!

Ok, what do we have? Assuming Schilling is gonzo:
 
Ace: Josh Beckett
#2: Dice-K
#3: Wakefield
#4/5: Lester/Bucholz
 
Setup/Relief: Delcarmen, Timlin, Oki-Doki, Snyder, Aardsma, Tavarez...
Closer: Mr. Incredible (seriously, he looks just like Mr. Incredible's son! - what a package...)
 
Sox sign Yooooook to a $3Mil deal....
 
Oh yeah, you feelin' it?...
 

Democracy and Democrats

Democracy and Democrats

For seven long years, many Democrats have fumed that Al Gore was elected president in November 2000. Gore won the popular vote, only to have George W. Bush wind up in the Oval Office. Long story there. But how will those aggrieved Democrats react if, say, Sen. Hillary Clinton emerges as her party's nominee -- even though Sen. Barack Obama attracted more votes in primaries and caucuses nationwide?

As Wednesday dawns, Democrats face the possibility that the primary season will end in June without either candidate amassing the 2,025 convention delegates he or she needs.

Consider: Tuesday night's results from the so-called Potomac Primary brought Clinton more dyspepsia than a serving of spoiled crab cakes. Obama's victories in Maryland, Virginia and the District of Columbia push his winning streak to eight straight contests since last week's Super Tuesday extravaganza. Hawaii and Wisconsin voters speak next Tuesday -- quite possibly leaving Obama with 10 victories in a row over Clinton.
But there are (at least) three ways Clinton can thwart Obama and his momentum:

- She can defeat him by winning enough delegates in states still ahead on the primary calendar: Ohio, Texas, Pennsylvania and so on. Fair enough. Obama's loyalists then would choose to rally 'round her. Or not.

- She can negate Obama's small but growing lead in the delegate count by persuading enough of the 796 superdelegates -- elected officials and other Democratic insiders -- to ignore the popular vote from all the primaries and caucuses. Obama has a widening lead in votes cast. But Clinton and hubby Bill hold great sway with many of these party pooh-bahs. The opposing pressures on the superdelegates -- to declare Clinton the strongest candidate in November; to honor Democratic voters' wishes and bolt en masse to Obama -- will only intensify after Tuesday's Obamarama in three more primaries.

- She can pressure the party to recognize hundreds of delegates from Florida and Michigan. The two states currently are excluded from Democratic convention math because they violated party rules, advancing their primaries into January. Although the candidates agreed not to campaign there, Clinton "won" both non-events. Surely she's wishing she hadn't dismissed Michigan's Jan. 15 primary by stating on New Hampshire Public Radio: "It's clear, this election they're having is not going to count for anything."

Former U.S. Solicitor Gen. Theodore Olson, writing in Monday's Wall Street Journal, noted that three factors -- the superdelegates, the reliance on caucuses (rather than primaries) in some states to pick delegates, and the Democrats' "Byzantine, hyper-egalitarian" formulas that involve proportional allocation of delegates -- could leave one candidate with majority support from voters but a minority count in convention delegates.

That's essentially the same dilemma, albeit in a new setting, that bedeviled Democrats in 2000: More Americans voted for Gore, but by the rules of the game -- the role of the Electoral College, and the U.S. Supreme Court decision that halted a constitutionally unfair Florida recount -- Bush won the presidency.

Will the Democrats' primary process similarly produce a nominee who finished second in the primaries and caucuses? That is, second in the hearts of Democratic voters?

Could happen, which argues that the wisest course for superdelegates is to follow the lead of Democratic voters nationwide.

If the superdelegates deny the nomination to the candidate who wins the most primary and caucus support, rank-and-file Democrats will know whom to blame. And it won't be the Supreme Court.
 
- Chicago Tribune 

Doing The Job Alone

 

Dear Sir,

I am writing in response to your request for additional information. In block number 3 of the accident reporting form, I put "trying to do the job alone" as the cause of my accident. You said in your letter that I should explain more fully, and I trust that the following details will be sufficient:

I am a bricklayer by trade. On the day of the accident, I was working alone on the roof of a new six story building. When I completed my work, I discovered that I had about 500 pounds of brick left over. Rather than carry the bricks down by hand, I decided to lower them in a barrel by using a pulley, which, fortunately, was attached to the side of the building at the sixth floor.

Securing the rope at ground level, I went up to the roof, swung the barrel out and loaded the brick into it. Then I went back to the ground and untied the rope, holding it tight to insure a slow descent of the 500 pounds of bricks. You will note, in block number 11 of the accident reporting form, that I weigh 135 pounds.

Due to my surprise of being jerked off the ground so suddenly, I lost my presence of mind and forgot to let go of the rope. Needless to say, I proceeded at a rather rapid rate up the side of the building.

In the vicinity of the third floor, I met the barrel coming down. This explains the fractured skull and broken collarbone. Slowed only slightly, I continued my rapid ascent, not stopping until the fingers of my right hand were two knuckles deep into the pulley. Fortunately, by this time, I had regained my presence of mind and was able to hold tightly to the rope in spite of my pain.

At approximately the same time, however, the barrel of bricks hit the ground, and the bottom broke out of the barrel. Devoid of the weight of the bricks, the barrel now weighed approximately fifty pounds.

I refer you again to my weight in the accident reporting form, block number 11.
As you might imagine, I began a rapid descent down the side of the building. In the vicinity of the third floor, I met the barrel coming up. This accounted for the two fractured ankles and the lacerations on my legs and lower body.

The encounter with the barrel slowed me enough to lessen my injuries when I fell onto the pile of bricks, and fortunately, only three vertebrae were cracked. I am sorry to report, however, that as I lay there on the bricks in pain, unable to stand, and watching the empty barrel six stories above me...I again lost my presence of mind...and let go of the rope!

Scalia Sees a Role for Physical Interrogations

Scalia Sees a Role for Physical Interrogations

WASHINGTON — Justice Antonin Scalia said Tuesday that some physical interrogation techniques could be used on a suspect in the event of an imminent threat, like a hidden bomb about to blow up.

In such cases, “smacking someone in the face” could be justified, Justice Scalia told the British Broadcasting Corporation. He added, “You can’t come in smugly and with great self-satisfaction and say, ‘Oh, it’s torture, and therefore it’s no good.’ ”

His comments come amid a growing debate about the Bush administration’s use of aggressive interrogation methods on terrorism suspects, including the widely condemned waterboarding, soon after the Sept. 11 attacks.

Justice Scalia, speaking in an interview with “Law in Action,” a program on BBC Radio 4, said it would be “extraordinary” to assume that the Constitution’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment applied to “so-called” torture in the face of imminent threat. He said that the Constitution “is referring to punishment for crime.”

“And, for example, incarcerating someone indefinitely would certainly be cruel and unusual punishment for a crime,” he said.

But “is it really so easy,” he said, “to determine that smacking someone in the face to determine where he has hidden the bomb that is about to blow up Los Angeles is prohibited in the Constitution?”

“It would be absurd to say you couldn’t do that,” the justice said. “And once you acknowledge that, we’re into a different game. How close does the threat have to be? And how severe can the infliction of pain be?”

Justice Scalia also ridiculed European criticism of the death penalty in the United States.

“If you took a public opinion poll, if all of Europe had representative democracies that really worked, most of Europe would probably have the death penalty today,” he said.

“There are arguments for it and against it,” he said. “But to get self-righteous about the thing as Europeans tend to do about the American death penalty is really quite ridiculous.”

Why McCain Must Never Become President

Why McCain Must Never Become President
http://politicalgrind.com/2008/02/11/why-mccain-must-never-become-president/

Government Stimulus Package

Bush Ready to Sign Economic Aid Package

WASHINGTON (AP) — If government rebate checks ranging from $300 to $1,200 for just about every household don't spur a consumer spending spree strong enough to cure what ails the economy, Congress is ready to throw more money at the problem. Skeptical economists and a worried public question whether the rebates for more than 130 million Americans and tax breaks for businesses will be quick enough or effective enough to avert a recession, though analysts generally believe the $168 billion economic rescue package President Bush planned to sign Wednesday could help prevent the current downturn from ballooning into a crisis.

Democrats and Republicans who put aside deep differences to craft the plan and rush it to enactment were to join the president at the White House for an afternoon signing ceremony.

The package is designed in part to inoculate lawmakers from vote blame should the economy continue to lag as the November elections bear down.  Congressional leaders already are considering more economic rescue measures that could include transportation spending, unemployment aid and measures to address the housing crunch that's at the root of the current economic doldrums.

The centerpiece of this stimulus plan is rebates expected to go out beginning in May to taxpayers and low-income people, including seniors living off of Social Security and veterans who depend on disability checks. Businesses would get tax breaks for investing in new plants and equipment.

Most taxpayers will receive a check of up to $600 for individuals and $1,200 for couples from the Internal Revenue Service, with an additional $300 per child. People earning at least $3,000 and those who owe little to no taxes would get $300 for singles, $600 for couples. Those making more than $75,000 and couples with income exceeding $150,000 are to get smaller rebates — $50 less per $1,000 they make over those thresholds.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., this week said the measure was "far from a panacea," adding that, "much more should be done to address our economy's longer-term problems." On Tuesday he said the Senate would consider "another stimulus package or two" on housing and other issues. The legislation could be ready for action by late February, aides said.

In the meantime, economists are debating how effective the rebates will be, with critics arguing that debt-burdened consumers will use the money to pay bills rather than spending the checks and spurring growth.

An Associated Press-Ipsos poll found that only 19 percent of those surveyed said they planned to spend their rebate checks [that means that less than 1-out-of-5 acutually plan to 'stimulate' the economy with their rebates]. Forty-five percent said they would pay bills, while 32 percent said they planned to invest the money.

The last time the government sent out rebates, in 2003, recipients spent a little less than a third in the first six months, and about two-thirds within the first year, according to findings by the University of Michigan Survey of Consumers, cited by congressional tax analysts. After rebates were sent out in 2001, just 22 percent said they would mostly spend them — rather than saving the money or using it to pay off debt — and only one-third of the rebate was spent in the short run, according to the same study.

Lawmakers argue it will take much more to restore confidence to an economy battered by a housing slump and mortgage mess. Some are pushing for broad mortgage reform, including measures to crack down on risky loan practices and help homeowners with subprime loans avoid default.

"What we've done with the stimulus bill is we've reacted to a weak economy without going back and addressing the cause," said Rep. Melissa Bean, D-Ill. "The stimulus package is bailing water, but now we've got to go back and plug the leak."

The bill would raise temporarily to $729,750 the limit on Federal Housing Administration loans and the cap on loans that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac can buy. Those measures are designed to provide relief in the market for "jumbo" mortgages and help more homeowners refinance into government-insured loans.

 

"Obama's Fairness"

48% of the people earning money in America do not pay Federal Income Tax. The successful - the 52% - of Americans will get a TAX INCREASE to pay for universal healthcare, jobs, medical bills, education, for the 48%.
 
That 48% will succumb to the democrat notion of the government largess by being 'kept down'.
 
Now, try and guess which group you are in. If you are completely a dolt, all you need to do is look at your paycheck. See that section that says "Fed. Tax:"?
 
Ah, I'm thinking a light just came on. This is Obama's Fairness Doctrine.
 
"We're all in this together." - Carl Marx

Democrats, don't forget this

If you work for a living, believe in individual responsibility, the Delegate College, know this:
 
For the past eight years, the democrats have been hysterically screaming (with the liberal left marxists) that Al Gore had the election stolen from him by George Bush because Al Gore won the popular vote.
 
Question: What do you do if you are a democrat and Barack Obama gains more popular votes? Democrat mouth-piecing has put you in a very untenable position. Do now go with the Delegate Count and put Mrs. Bill Clinton up as your nominee? Or do you 'stick to your guns (literally)' and give Obama the nomination due to popular vote?
 
How do you reconcile the past eight years of complaining and whining?
 
Question: Do you FEAR putting up a democrat black candidate against a republican war veteran? Is it win at all costs with Hillary?
 
How do democrats sleep at night?

Westminster Dog Show Winner

And the winner is: "Uno!"

Berkeley clashes with Marines

Activists block the doors of the Marine Corps recruiting center during a recent protest in Berkeley. Watch video and read the latest on the developing story

Word Up!

"The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only
as are injurious to others.  But it does me no injury for my
neighbour to say there are twenty gods, or no god.  It neither
picks my pocket nor breaks my leg."

-- Thomas Jefferson (Notes on the State of Virginia, Query 17,
1782)

Tuesday, February 12, 2008

Obama Sweeps Chesapeake Primaries, Press Declares Clinton the Big Winner

Barack Obama won convincing primary victories today in Maryland, Washington D.C., and Virginia, but in a semi-unusual development, FOX News called the election for Hillary Clinton. The other networks soon followed FOX's lead.

"What can we say? We hate to be scooped," said CNN anchor, Soledad O'Brien. "You can see why we had no choice but to go along with the crowd."

As expected, thousands of Obama supporters sent protest emails, but the networks stood by their decision, pointing to a previously un-scrutinized Democratic Party rule that brings into existence something called Super Duper Deluxe Secret Delegates, which are roughly the equivalent of 2,300 pledged delegates, more than enough to sway the election.

Further investigation revealed that only one Super Duper Deluxe Secret Delegate actually exists, and his name is Josh Dinklestein. As it happens, Mr. Dinklestein is a former classmate of Clinton's daughter, Chelsea, and he apparently once referred to Chelsea as "a ho-bag." Basically, Hillary now owns his ass.

Late this afternoon, the networks issued this joint statement: "The general election is between McCain and Clinton. Get used to it. We want to hear no further discussion on this matter.

Competition for Super Delegates Heats Up

As the Democratic primaries wear on through the end of winter and into the spring, it is becoming increasingly apparent that neither Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama will have the minimum number of delegates needed for the Democratic presidential nomination.

Attention is beginning to fall more and more upon the issue of Democratic super delegates whose votes will decide the nomination at the Democratic Convention this summer.

In response, Hillary Clinton has suspended all further campaign funding for the primary races to concentrate her resources on wooing the 'super-vote'. Thus far she has picked up endorsements from Wonder Woman, Supergirl and Sheena Queen of the Jungle, but her appeals have fallen on deaf ears among male superheroes.

Obama is polling well with the supermen with the exception of Superman himself who is currently involved in a copyright lawsuit with Al Gore who claims he's the real Superman. Conventional wisdom is that Superman is withholding his endorsement until one of the candidates can convince Al Gore to get a life.

In the meantime, Dennis Kucinich is strategically positioned to benefit if delegate gridlock carries over into the superdelegation. Kucinich is counting on this and is positioning himself as the compromise candidate to pick up delegates from both the Obama and Clinton camps. As Kucinich said 'Stranger things have happened, like my recent astral visits to the Andromeda galaxy, but I am confident support will swing my way - especially if I use MY superpowers.'

Berkeley City Council

[I'm surprised the treasonist coffe-sipping liberal left managed to crawl out of bed today to make it to the party...but, hey, freedom of speech, eh?]

Protesters off to early start outside Berkeley City Council chambers
Bay Area News Group
Article Launched: 02/12/2008 08:05:29 AM PST

A pre-dawn confrontation broke out this morning in Berkeley between peace activists and pro military groups, more than 12 hours before the City Council considers to rescind its statement telling the U.S. Marines they're unwelcome in this left-leaning town.
Police were forced to form a line between the two groups to keep them apart shortly after 6 a.m. at the park across Martin Luther King Jr. Way from old City Hall, where the City Council meets.

An hour and a half later, the shouting continued, but there had been no arrests, a police dispatcher said.

The Berkeley City Council tonight is scheduled to revisit the council's Jan. 29 approval of a resolution calling the U.S. Marines' recruiting office on Shattuck Avenue "uninvited and unwelcome intruders." The vote was 6-3 in favor.

The 6-3 vote on that item caused a nationwide backlash against the city, prompting Republicans in Washington and Sacramento to introduce legislation to take away money for things like school lunches and police communications equipment.

Just about every City Council meeting in Berkeley includes protesters who show support or disdain for whatever is on the agenda.

But tonight, the city is likely to host the mother of all meetings in its recent history. Councilman Gordon Wozniak, who opposed the council's actions two weeks ago on the recruiting station, said he received 26,000 e-mails on the subject in the past 10 days (24,000 supporting the Marines, 2,000 against), and he
is just one of nine council members.
"On a hot issue, we sometimes get a couple hundred e-mails," Wozniak said. "I've never seen anything like this. I'm getting one every five minutes. It's huge."

Today's protests could bring upwards of 500 people from both sides. And hundreds of union members also are expected at the meeting to protest a separate item seeking to regulate a local steel foundry. Sacramento-based Move America Forward and a handful of other pro-military organizations are set to have several hundred protesters in front of council chambers starting at 5 a.m. On the other side, Code Pink, a women's peace organization, was planning to camp out for 24 hours to argue the U.S. Marines should get out of town.

Meanwhile, union workers are protesting a move to put restrictions on Pacific Steel Casting, which many in Berkeley blame for a persistent odor and health problems in some neighborhoods.

All that for a meeting space with a capacity of 123.

To accommodate tonight's expected crowd of protesters and reporters, the city will broadcast the meeting outside on speakers.

Move America Forward is already unhappy with what council members are not planning to do - rescinding four other items the council passed that are seen as a swipe at the Marines. Those items asked the city attorney to investigate whether the Marines are violating city law prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation; urged people to 'impede' the recruiting work of the Marines in Berkeley; and gave Code Pink a free parking space and sound permit to protest once a week in front of the recruiting station.

The proposal by council members Betty Olds and Laurie Capitelli to rescind the item sending the Marines a letter asking them to leave is No. 25 of 28 items on tonight's agenda, and could come up for debate near midnight. What's more, pro-military supporters will have to sit through another item likely to make them seethe: urging Canada to provide sanctuary for U.S. military war resisters.

"Our organization has taken a stand that the council needs to apologize and rescind all the resolutions," said Danny Gonzalez, communications director for Move America Forward. "We can only hope that one of the council members has the sense to make a change and re-evaluate their stance on all the issues."

By only rescinding the one item, the council, in effect, is still "attempting to get the Marines to leave," Gonzalez said.

"They're just trying to get the heat off, and that's not going to work," Gonzalez said. "It's empty; it's not a genuine apology."

Code Pink is going to the meeting to thank the council for its actions against the recruiting station.

"We're so pleased the council is taking a strong stand for peace, and we intend to be there in full force to let them know we support them," said Zanne Joi, a Code Pink activist. "We trust the council will not be swayed by this vicious right-wing attack."

Joi said the reaction by people across the country angry the council asked the Marines to leave town shows the tide of public sentiment has long since turned against the war in Iraq.

"This violent reaction of the pro-war forces shows how threatened they are by a small group of people working against recruitment," Joi said. "They claim the Marines fought for our freedom of speech, and how dare we use our freedom of speech against them."

More: Code Pink - Don't Enlist! Stay and Kiss!

The Democratic Platform

Class envy is a pejorative term sometimes used to describe criticisms of the rich and powerful by the poor and less powerful. It is a politer way of saying that somebody has a 'chip on his shoulder' or is, as a consequence, 'chippy'.

Criticism of excessive wealth and the wealthy has been a staple of political discourse for generations and many believe that societal imbalances in wealth should be reduced or done away with. The use of the term "class envy" is generally intended as a rebuttal to these arguments, based on the idea that the antagonism that the poor feel towards the wealthy is based upon envy rather than feelings of repression or unfairness. Proponents of this view argue that the poorer members of society attack the rich and their privileges because they are envious of the wealth and success the upper classes enjoy.

The simplest counter-argument is that "class envy" is an ad hominem fallacy. In other words, that even assuming class envy plays a significant part in social conflict, it does not necessarily detract from the validity of the ideas put forward by those who harbor this emotion (if one is envious, that has no bearing on whether one is right or wrong).

Another counter-argument, often invoked by Marxists, is that the classes are defined by their relationship with each other, where the worker creates wealth, and the capitalist is simply a parasite who expropriates surplus value from the workers who work for him or her. According to this view, the wealthy do not rightfully deserve their wealth, so the poor are justified in feeling resentful towards them.

The political debate over wealth and its distribution or re-distribution is an emotional one, with left-wing groups denigrating the wealthy and right-wing groups accusing liberals of exploiting class envy. The term "class envy" is used by many conservative institutions such as the Wall Street Journal and the British Conservative Party. The term is not ostensibly directed at the poor themselves, but rather at groups that are viewed as trying to encourage or take advantage of class envy such as liberal media outlets or leftist political parties.

Use of the word envy in the phrase class envy instead of a word like resentment, or jealousy is what working class activists feel is pejorative about this phrase, since envy means not only resentment, but also desire to attain the advantage held by the resented party. In other words class envy means the working class group accused of class envy not only resent the ruling class, which most working class activists would concede, but that they desire to be in a ruling class over a working class. What this idea neglects is that it is possible that a worker doesn't want to get rid of his working class status within capitalism, but wants to get rid of capitalism itself as a system, just as economic systems like slavery and feudalism were removed from many countries. If all workers had an equal relationship to the means of production in this view, there would be nothing to be envious of. It is not known if any worker has actually turned down an option for class elevation, but the notion that they would persists in some, usually non-worker, circles.

Elements of "class envy" phenomena can be said to exist in many cultures - for example, the persistent Australian myth of the "dole bludger," one who avoids work and lives on the wealth of others. Another Australian example would be the "tall poppy syndrome" where a successful individual is discredited by their social group as success is believed to come from dishonesty.

Despite these possible examples of class envy it is still a term mostly used in polemical discourse. Unlike similar notions such as class consciousness there is no theoretical underpinning to the idea of class envy other than in psychology. In large part this has to do with the fact that those who advocate it also often criticize the very notion of class.

Class warfare is often presented as the end result of class envy as well as other factors which motivate the redistribution of wealth and power amongst the classes.

The Design Argument

This sort of argument is of wide and perennial appeal. Almost everyone admits that reflection on the order and beauty of nature touches something very deep within us. But are the order and beauty the product of intelligent design and conscious purpose? For theists the answer is yes. Arguments for design are attempts to vindicate this answer, to show why it is the most reasonable one to give. They have been formulated in ways as richly varied as the experience in which they are rooted. The following displays the core or central insight.

The universe displays a staggering amount of intelligibility, both within the things we observe and in the way these things relate to others outside themselves. That is to say: the way they exist and coexist display an intricately beautiful order and regularity that can fill even the most casual observer with wonder. It is the norm in nature for many different beings to work together to produce the same valuable end--for example, the organs in the body work for our life and health. (See also argument 8.)
Either this intelligible order is the product of chance or of intelligent design.
Not chance.
Therefore the universe is the product of intelligent design.
Design comes only from a mind, a designer.
Therefore the universe is the product of an intelligent Designer.
The first premise is certainly true?even those resistant to the argument admit it. The person who did not would have to be almost pathetically obtuse. A single protein molecule is a thing of immensely impressive order; much more so a single cell; and incredibly much more so an organ like the eye, where ordered parts of enormous and delicate complexity work together with countless others to achieve a single certain end. Even chemical elements are ordered to combine with other elements in certain ways and under certain conditions. Apparent disorder is a problem precisely because of the overwhelming pervasiveness of order and regularity. So the first premise stands.

If all this order is not in some way the product of intelligent design--then what? Obviously, it "just happened." Things just fell out that way "by chance." Alternatively, if all this order is not the product of blind, purposeless forces, then it has resulted from some kind of purpose. That purpose can only be intelligent design. So the second premise stands.

It is of course the third premise that is crucial. Ultimately, nonbelievers tell us, it is indeed by chance and not by any design that the universe of our experience exists the way it does. It just happens to have this order, and the burden of proof is on believers to demonstrate why this could not be so by chance alone.

But this seems a bit backward. It is surely up to nonbelievers to produce a credible alternative to design. And "chance" is simply not credible. For we can understand chance only against a background of order. To say that something happened "by chance" is to say that it did not turn out as we would have expected, or that it did turn out in a way we would not have expected. But expectation is impossible without order. If you take away order and speak of chance alone as a kind of ultimate source, you have taken away the only background that allows us to speak meaningfully of chance at all. Instead of thinking of chance against a background of order, we are invited to think of order?overwhelmingly intricate and ubiquitous order?against a random and purposeless background of chance. Frankly, that is incredible. Therefore it is eminently reasonable to affirm the third premise, not chance, and therefore to affirm the conclusion, that this universe is the product of intelligent design.

Question 1: Hasn't the Darwinian theory of evolution shown us how it is possible for all the order in the universe to have arisen by chance?

Reply: Not at all. If the Darwinian theory has shown anything, it has shown, in a general way, how species may have descended from others through random mutation; and how survival of these species can be accounted for by natural selection--by the fitness of some species to survive in their environment. In no way does it--can it--account for the ubiquitous order and intelligibility of nature. Rather, it presupposes order. To quote a famous phrase: "The survival of the fittest presupposes the arrival of the fit." If Darwinians wish to extrapolate from their purely biological theory and maintain that all the vast order around us is the result of random changes, then they are saying something which no empirical evidence could ever confirm; which no empirical science could ever demonstrate; and which, on the face of it, is simply beyond belief.

Question 2: Maybe it is only in this region of the universe that order is to be found. Maybe there are other parts unknown to us that are completely chaotic--or maybe the universe will one day in the future become chaotic. What becomes of the argument then?

Reply: Believers and nonbelievers both experience the same universe. It is this which is either designed or not. And this world of our common experience is a world of pervasive order and intelligibility. That fact must be faced. Before we speculate about what will be in the future or what may be elsewhere in the present, we need to deal honestly with what is. We need to recognize in an unflinching way the extent--the overwhelming extent--of order and intelligibility. Then we can ask ourselves: Is it credible to suppose that we inhabit a small island of order surrounded by a vast sea of chaos--a sea which threatens one day to engulf us?

Just consider how in the last decades we have strained fantastically at the limits of our knowledge; we have cast our vision far beyond this planet and far within the elements that make it up. And what has this expansion of our horizons revealed? Always the same thing: more--and not less--intelligibility; more--and not less--complex and intricate order. Not only is there no reason to believe in a surrounding chaos, there is every reason not to. It flies in the face of the experience that all of us--believers and nonbelievers--share in common.

Something similar can be said about the future. We know the way things in the universe have behaved and are behaving. And so, until we have some reason to think otherwise, there is every reason to believe it will continue on its orderly path of running down. No speculation can nullify what we know.

And, anyway, exactly what sort of chaos is this question asking us to imagine? That effect precedes cause? That the law of contradiction does not hold? That there need not be what it takes for some existing thing to exist? These suggestions are completely unintelligible; if we think about them at all, it is only to reject them as impossible. Can we imagine less order? Yes. Some rearrangement of the order we experience? Yes. But total disorder and chaos? That can never be considered as a real possibility. To speculate about it as if it were is really a waste of time.

Question 3: But what if the order we experience is merely a product of our minds? Even though we cannot think utter chaos and disorder, maybe that is how reality really is.

Reply: Our minds are the only means by which we can know reality. We have no other access. If we agree that something cannot exist in thought, we cannot go ahead and say that it might nevertheless exist in reality. Because then we would be thinking what we claim cannot be thought.

Suppose you claim that order is just a product of our minds. This puts you in a very awkward position. You are saying that we must think about reality in terms of order and intelligibility, but things may not exist that way in fact. Now to propose something for consideration is to think about it. And so you are saying: (a) we must think about reality in a certain way, but (b) since we think that things may not in fact exist that way, then (c) we need not think about reality the way we must think about it! Are we willing to pay that high a price to deny that the being of the universe displays intelligent design? It does not, on the face of it, seem cost effective.

Men and Women

Seven New York City bartenders were asked if they could 'nail' a woman's personality based on what she drinks. Though interviewed separately, they concurred on almost all counts. The results:
PART A: WOMEN-DRINKS, WHO THEY ARE, & YOU!

Drink: Beer
Personality: Causal, low-maintenance; down to earth.
Your Approach: Challenge her to a game of pool.


Drink: Blender Drinks
Personality: Flaky, whiny, annoying; a pain in the ass.
Your Approach: Avoid her, unless you want to be her cabana boy. {Christa}

Drink: Mixed Drinks
Personality: Older, more refined, high maintenance, has very picky taste; knows EXACTLY what she wants.
Your Approach: You won't have to approach her. If she's interested, she'll send YOU a drink..................


Drink: Wine (does not include White Zinfandel)
Personality: Conservative and classy; sophisticated yet giggles.
Your Approach: Tell her you love to travel and spend quiet evenings with my friends.


Drink: White Zinfandel
Personality: Easy; thinks she is classy and sophisticated, actually, she has NO clue.
Your Approach: Make her feel smarter than she is...this should be an easy target.


Drink: Shots
Personality: Likes to hang with pals and looking to get
totally drunk... and naked. {Mittens}
Your Approach: Easiest hit in the joint. You have been blessed. Nothing to do but wait, however, be careful not to make her mad! {Mittens!!!!}


Drink: Tequila
No explanations required - everyone just KNOWS what happens there. {Mittens, Diane!}


PART B: MAN-DRINKS & WHO THE MEN ARE!

THEN, there is the MALE addendum -- The deal with guys is, as always, very simple and clear cut:

Domestic Beer: He's poor and wants to get laid. {Bob}
Imported Beer: He likes good beer and wants to get laid. {Dave}

Wine:
He is hoping that the wine will give him a sophisticated
image to help him get laid. {No Clue unless hitting on White Zin Girl}

Whiskey: He doesn't give a damn about anything but getting laid. {Mark}
Tequila: He is thinking he has a chance with the toothless waitress. {You ALWAYS have a chance with 'Ole Toothless!}

White Zinfandel: He's gay {No Comment}

Threat

Al Qaeda is improving the last key aspect of its ability to attack the U.S.: the identification, training, and positioning of operatives for an attack in the Homeland. While increased security measures at home and abroad have caused al Qaeda to view the West, especially the U.S., as a harder target, we have seen an influx of new Western recruits into the tribal areas since mid-2006. We assess that al Qaeda's Homeland plotting is likely to continue to focus on prominent political, economic, and infrastructure targets designed to produce mass casualties, visually dramatic destruction, significant economic aftershocks, and/or fear among the population.

We judge use of a conventional explosive to be the most probable al Qaeda attack scenario because the group is proficient with conventional small arms and improvised explosive devices and is innovative in creating capabilities and overcoming security obstacles. That said, al Qaeda and other terrorist groups are attempting to acquire chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear weapons and materials (CBRN). We assess al Qaeda will continue to try to acquire and employ these weapons and materials -- some chemical and radiological materials and crude weapons designs are easily accessible, in our judgment.

-Director of National Intelligence Mike McConnell to the Senate Intelligence Committee last week.